SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

(AMENDMENT NO.___)

Filed by the Registrantoþ

Filed by a Party other than the Registranto

Check the appropriate box:

   
oþ Definitive Proxy Statement
þo Preliminary Proxy Statement
o Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
o Definitive Additional Materials
o Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

 

KB HOME


(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

KB HOME


(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

     
oþ  No fee required.
o  Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.
  (1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:


  (2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:


  (3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):


  (4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:


  (5) Total fee paid:


o Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
o Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
  (1) Amount Previously Paid:


  (2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:


  (3) Filing Party:


  (4) Date Filed:



(KB HOME LOGO)
NOTICE OF 20072008 KB HOME
ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
AND PROXY STATEMENT
KB Home AnnualAPRIL 3, 2008
Meeting of Stockholders
and Proxy Statement



TABLE OF CONTENTS

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders
Proxy Statement
Corporate Governance and Board Matters
Proposal 1: Election of Directors
Proposal 2: Approval of an Amendment to the Amended Certificate of Incorporation of KB Home to Declassify the Board of Directors and Provide for the Annual Election of Directors
Proposal 3: Approval of an Amendment to the Amended Certificate of Incorporation of KB Home to Eliminate its “Fair Price” Provision and Related Supermajority Vote Requirements
Proposal 4: Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Proposal 5: Stockholder Proposal
Proposal 6: Stockholder Proposal
Proposal 7: Stockholder Proposal
Ownership of KB Home Securities
Management Development and Compensation Committee Report on Executive Compensation
KB Home Common Stock Price Performance
Employment Agreements, Change in Control Arrangements, Retirement and Death Benefit Plans
Executive Compensation
Audit and Compliance Committee Report
Independent Auditor Fees and Services
Other Matters


KB HOME

10990 Wilshire Boulevard

Los Angeles, California 90024
(310) 231-4000
(310) 231-4000
 
Jeffrey T. Mezger
President and Chief Executive Officer
March 5, 20072008
Dear Fellow Stockholder:
Your officers and directors join me in inviting you to attend the 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of KB Home at 9:00 a.m. Pacific Daylight Time on April 5, 2007 in the Garden Room3, 2008 at the Hotel Bel-Air, 701 Stone Canyon Road,our headquarters in Los Angeles, California.
The matters expected to be acted on atitems of business for the meeting are described in detail in the attached Notice of 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement. In addition to specific agenda items, by attending the Annual Meeting youWe also will have an opportunity to hear aboutdiscuss our 2007 results and our plans for the future and to meet your officers and directors.future.
We look forward to seeing you on April 5.3.
Sincerely,
/s/Jeffrey T. Mezger
 
Jeffrey T. Mezger
President and Chief Executive Officer


KB LOGO

 
Notice of 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
Notice of Annual Meeting
of Stockholders
   
Time and Date:
 9:00 a.m. Pacific Daylight Time on Thursday, April 5, 2007.3, 2008.
 
Location:
 Garden Room, Hotel Bel-Air, 701 Stone Canyon Road,10990 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, California.CA 90024.
 
Items of Business:
 (1)Elect three Class III Directors,directors, each to serve for a three-year term, and one Class I Director, to serve for a one-year term;
 
 (2)Vote on an amendment to the Amended Certificate of Incorporation of KB Home to declassify the Board of Directors and provide for the annual election of Directors;
 
  (3)Vote on an amendment to the Amended Certificate of Incorporation of KB Home to eliminate its “fair price” provision and related supermajority voting requirements;
(4)(2)  Ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for theour fiscal year ending November 30, 2007;2008;
 
  (5)(3)  Consider threetwo stockholder proposals, if properly presented at the meeting; and
 
  (6)To transact(4)  Transact any other business as may properly come before the meeting andor any adjournment or postponement thereof.of the meeting.
  
The accompanying Proxy Statement describes these items in more detail. We have not received notice of any other matters that may be properly presented at the meeting.
   
Record Date:
 You can vote at the meeting and at any postponement or adjournment of the meeting if you were a stockholder of record on February 14, 2007.2008.
 
If you attendAttending the Meeting:
 If you plan to attend the meeting, you may be asked to present photo identification and you may be accompanied by only one guest. If you hold your shares of our common stock in a brokerage or similar account (in “street name”), you will need to bring a statement reflecting the shares you owned on February 14, 2007.2008.
 
Proxy Voting:
 Whether or not you expect to attend the meeting, please promptly complete and return the Proxy Cardproxy card or voting instruction card you received to ensure that your shares will be represented. If available to you are a holder of record, you may also vote by using the telephone number or via the Internet web site address printed on your Proxy Card orproxy card. If your shares are held in street name, you must vote your shares in the manner prescribed on the voting instruction card.card your broker or nominee provided to you.
 
Annual Report:
 Copies of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2006,2007, including audited financial statements, are being mailed to stockholders concurrently with this Proxy Statement. It is anticipatedWe anticipate that the mailing will commence on or about March 5, 2007.6, 2008.
Internet
Availability of
Materials:
This Notice of 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and the accompanying Proxy Statement, a sample proxy card and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2007 may be viewed, printed and downloaded from the Internet at www.kbhome.com/investor/proxy.
By Order of The Board of Directors,
/s/William A. Richelieu
 
(-s- Wendy C. Shiba)
William A. RichelieuWendy C. Shiba
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and
Corporate Secretary
Assistant Corporate Secretary
Los Angeles, California

March 5, 20072008


Table of Contents
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
8
8
9
9
13
13
16
17
19
22
22
23
24
25
25
25
25
26
27
28
29
33
34
34
35
37
38
39
42
43
44
44
54
55
56
56
57
57
57


KB LOGO

KB HOME

10990 Wilshire Boulevard

Los Angeles, California 90024
Proxy Statement

for the
2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
To Be Held April 5, 20073, 2008
 
General Information
Why didDid I receive thisReceive This Proxy Statement?
 
Your Board of Directors is furnishing this Proxy Statement to you to solicit your proxy to be voted at our 20072008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The Annual Meeting is scheduled for Thursday, April 5, 2007,3, 2008, at the time and place and for the purposes set forth in the accompanying Notice of 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. We anticipate that the mailing of this Proxy Statement to stockholders will commence on or about March 6, 2008.
Can I attendAttend the Annual Meeting?
 
You are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting.Please note however, that you may be asked to present photo identification and be subject to a security check, and that no cameras, recording equipment, electronic devices, large bags, briefcases or packages will be permitted in the Annual Meeting. Also, due to space constraints, you may be accompanied by only one guest. Parking is available at the garage for the meeting location, which is accessed from Veteran Avenue.
Who is entitledEntitled to voteVote at the Annual Meeting?
 
Only holders of record of the 89,374,12277,420,742 shares of our Common Stockcommon stock outstanding at the close of business on February 14, 2007 will be2008 are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. Each holder of our Common Stockcommon stock is entitled to one vote for each share held. Our Grantor Stock Ownership Trust, established to assist us in meeting certain of our obligations to employees under our employee benefit plans, held 12,337,88212,155,082 shares of our Common Stockcommon stock for voting purposes as of February 14, 2007.2008. These shares will be voted by the trustee of the Grantor Stock Ownership Trust in accordance with instructions received from employees who participate in certain of our employee benefit plans. There is no right to cumulative voting.
Who is a “Holder of Record”?
 
If your shares of our Common Stockcommon stock are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, Mellon Investor Services LLC, you are considered the “holder of record” of those shares. If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a financial institution or other holder of record, you are considered the beneficial owner of those shares held in “street name.”


1

1


How doDo I vote?Vote?
 
If you are a beneficial owner, you have the right to instruct your broker, financial institution or other holder of record on how to vote your shares of our common stock by using the voting instruction card you received from them or by following their respectiveparticular telephoneand/or Internet voting instructions.
 
If you are a holder of record, you may vote the proxy card you received by mail, by telephone or via the Internet, as described below.below:
 
Mail.  Please promptly complete and return your Proxy Cardproxy card in the postage-paid envelope provided.
 
Telephone.  Please call the toll-free telephone number listed on your Proxy Card.proxy card. Telephone voting procedures have been established to verify your identity, to allow you to provide proxy voting instructions and to confirm that your instructions were accurately recorded. Please have your Proxy Cardproxy card available when you call.
 
Internet.  Please visit the Internet web site address listed on your Proxy Card.proxy card. As with telephone voting, Internet voting procedures have been established to verify your identity and to confirm your voting instructions. Please have your Proxy Cardproxy card available when you visit the Internet web site address.
 
Telephone and Internet voting will be available to holders of record 24 hours each day until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time on April 4, 2007.2, 2008. If you use the toll-free telephone number or the Internet to provide your proxy voting instructions, you do not need to mail in your Proxy Card.proxy card.
 
Revoking Your Proxy Vote.  If you are a holder of record, you may revoke theyour proxy voting instructions you makemade by mail, by telephone or via the Internet at any time prior tobefore the exercise of those instructions at the Annual Meeting by deliveringMeeting. To do so, you must send a revocation in writing to us in care of the Corporate Secretary, KB Home, 10990 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90024.
 
If you are a beneficial owner, you may submit new voting instructions by contacting your broker, financial institution or other holder of record. You may also vote in person at the Annual Meeting as described in the next paragraph.
 
Voting In Person at the Annual Meeting.  Whether you are a holder of record or a beneficial owner, you may vote in person at the Annual Meeting, even if you have previously provided proxy voting instructions by mail, by telephone or via the Internet. If you are a holder of record, you may also be represented by another person at the Annual Meeting by executing a proper proxy designating that person. If you are a beneficial owner of shares of our Common Stock,common stock, you must obtain a legal proxy from your broker, bankfinancial institution or other holder of record and present it with your ballot to be able to vote in person at the Annual Meeting.
What are the voting requirementsVoting Requirements to electElect the Director nomineesNominees and to approve eachApprove Each of the proposalsProposals in thisThis Proxy Statement?
 
Under the laws of the State of Delaware, where we are incorporated, stockholders may take action at the Annual Meeting by voting their shares of our common stock as described above, provided a quorum is present. At least a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock entitled to vote must be present or represented at the Annual Meeting to establish a quorum. Abstentions and “broker non-votes” are counted as present and entitled to vote for purposes of establishing a quorum.
 
A “broker non-vote” arises when a broker, financial institution or other holder of record that holds shares in street name does not receive instructions from a beneficial owner and does not have the discretionary authority to vote on a particular item. Per current New York Stock Exchange rules, bro-

2


kersbrokers have discretionary authority to vote on the election of directors each of the management proposals to amend our Amended Certificate of Incorporation and on the ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm. Brokers do not, however, have discretionary authority to vote on the stockholder proposals in this Proxy Statement. Accordingly, broker non-votes will not be considered entitled to vote for those proposals and will have no effect on the outcome.
 
All shares of Common Stockour common stock represented by valid proxies received pursuant to this solicitation and not revoked will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with the proxy instructions given.


2


Because a proxy confers discretionary authority to vote uponon other matters that may properly come before the Annual Meeting, shares of our common stock represented by valid proxies will be voted in accordance with the judgment of Jeffrey T. Mezger, President and Chief Executive Officer, and William A. Richelieu, AssistantWendy C. Shiba, Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, who are the persons named as proxies on the Proxy Cardsproxy cards for holders of record,the Annual Meeting, or their duly authorized designees.
 
Where no instruction is made on a signed Proxy Cardproxy card with respect to any item submitted to a vote suchat the Annual Meeting, the shares of our common stock represented by the proxy card will be voted (a) for the election as Directorsdirectors of the fourthree individuals named under the heading “Election of Directors” onpages 13-15 below, for each of the management proposals to amend our Amended Certificate of Incorporation discussed on pages 20-23 below,(b) for the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for theour fiscal year ending November 30, 20072008, as discussed on page 2416 below, and (c) against the threetwo stockholder proposals in this Proxy Statement, if properly presented at the Annual Meeting, which are discussed on pages 25-3217-21 below.
 
Election of Directors.  The affirmative votePer our Bylaws, each director nominee must receive a majority of a plurality of the votes present or represented at the Annual Meeting is requiredcast in favor to elect each Director nominee. Accordingly, the Director nominee with the most votes for a particular board seat will be elected to that seat.the Board of Directors (i.e., the votes cast for a nominee’s election must exceed the votes cast against the nominee’s election). You may vote “for” all Directordirector nominees or you may “withhold” your vote “against” or “abstain” with respect to one or more of the Directordirector nominees. Abstentions willShares of our common stock that are not be counted.
   Under our Governance Principles, any Director elected to the Board of Directorspresent or represented at the Annual Meeting in an uncontested election with less thanand abstentions will not affect the affirmative vote of a majority of shares present in person or represented by proxy shall promptly tender his or her resignation to the Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board of Directors. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will then promptly evaluate all relevant factors and recommend to the full Board whether to accept the resignation or, if appropriate, to adopt another course of action to remedy the underlying cause(s)outcome of the election result. Subject to any applicable legal or regulatory requirements, the Board shall within 90 days following certification of the stockholder vote decide whether to accept the resignation, reject the resignation or, if appropriate, reject the resignation but adopt measures designed to address the underlying cause(s) of the election result. A full explanation of the Board’s decision will be publicly disclosed in a periodic or current report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. A Director who tenders his or her resignation because he or she was elected in an uncontested election with less than a majority of the shares present or represented at an Annual Meeting and any non-independent Director will not participate in these deliberations and decisions. As part of the new corporate governance initiatives discussed on page 5 below, the Board of Directors has resolved to move our mandatory majority voting policy from our Governance Principles to our Bylaws.directors.

3


 
Other Proposals in this Proxy Statement.  The affirmative vote of not less than 80% of the outstanding shares of our Common Stock is required to approve each of the management proposals to amend our Amended Certificate of Incorporation. The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of our Common Stockcommon stock present or represented at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote is required both to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for theour fiscal year ending November 30, 20072008 and to approve each of the stockholder proposals in this Proxy Statement, if properly presented at the Annual Meeting. You may vote “for,” “against,” or “abstain” with respect to any of these proposals. Abstentions will have the same effect as an “against” vote.
Are the Notice of Annual Meeting, This Proxy Statement and the 20062007 Annual Report onForm 10-K available online?Available Online?
 
Yes. The accompanying Notice of 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, this Proxy Statement, and the 2006 Annual Report onForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2007 and a sample proxy card may be viewed, printed or downloaded from our website at: http://www.kbhome.com/investor.investor/proxy.
Who will payWill Pay for this proxy solicitation?This Proxy Solicitation?
 
We will pay the entire cost of soliciting proxies. In addition to use of the mail, proxies may be solicited by our officers, Directorsdirectors and other employees by telephone, facsimile, email or personal solicitation, and no additional compensation will be paid to such individuals. We will, if requested, reimburse banks, brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees and certain fiduciaries for their reasonable expenses incurred in mailing proxy material to their principals. We have hired Georgeson Inc., a professional soliciting organization, to assist us in proxy solicitation and in distributing proxy materials to institutions, brokerage houses, custodians, nominees and other fiduciaries. For these services, we will pay Georgeson a fee of $8,500.$8,500, plus reimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses.
Who will countWill Count the vote?Vote?
 Representatives
A representative of our transfer agent, Mellon Investor Services LLC, will count the votes and act as an independent inspectorsinspector of election for the Annual Meeting. Ms. Shiba will also act as an inspector of election.


3

4


Corporate Governance and Board Matters
 
Role of the Board of Directors
 
The Board of Directors (“Board”) is elected by theour stockholders to oversee the management of our business and to assure that the long-term interests of our stockholders are being served.
Recent Corporate Governance InitiativesDirector Qualifications
 The Board of Directors has recently taken a number of actions to strengthen our corporate governance, including:
• Creating the position of independent Non-Executive Chairman of the Board and initiating a search to fill this position;
• Appointing Kenneth M. Jastrow, II to serve as independent Lead Director until the Non-Executive Chairman position is filled;
• Dissolving the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors, effective in April 2007;
• Initiating a comprehensive review of our compensation programs and practices;
• Approving a resolution to declassify the Board of Directors, which is being presented to stockholders for their approval at the Annual Meeting;
• Approving a resolution to eliminate the “fair price” provision and related supermajority voting requirements from our Amended Certificate of Incorporation, which is being presented to stockholders for their approval at the Annual Meeting;
• Resolving to move our mandatory majority voting for Directors policy from our Governance Principles to our Bylaws;
• Creating the positions of Chief Compliance Officer and Risk Assessment Officer, each of which will report to the Audit and Compliance Committee of the Board of Directors as well as to senior executive management, and initiating a search to fill these positions;
• Resolving to conduct a comprehensive internal review of our compliance environment upon the engagement of a Chief Compliance Officer;
• Adopting an Equity-Based Award Grant Policy to improve the policies and procedures governing our equity compensation practices; and
• Resolving to review our Director and executive stock ownership guidelines and assess Board compensation.
   The Board cannot declassify the Board of Directors or eliminate the “fair price” provision and related supermajority voting requirements from our Amended Certificate of Incorporation without first obtaining the affirmative vote of at least 80% of the outstanding shares of our Common Stock. We are therefore presenting Proposals 2 and 3 for your consideration at the Annual Meeting, as further described on pages 20-23 below.
Director Qualifications
We believe that our Directorsdirectors should possess the highest personal and professional ethics, integrity, judgment and values, and be committed to representing the long-term interests of our stockholders. Directors should also have an inquisitive and objective perspective, and be able and willing to dedicate the time necessary to Board and Board Committee service.

5


 
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board of Directors(“Nominating/Governance Committee”) regularly assesses the skills and characteristics of current and potential Directorsdirectors in view of the perceived needs of the Board at the time an assessment is made and may consider the following attributes, among others:
 • Personalpersonal qualities, accomplishments and reputation in the business community;
 
 • Financialfinancial literacy, financial and accounting expertise and significant business, academic or government experience in leadership positions or at senior policy-making levels;
 
 • Geographicalgeographical representation in areas relevant to our business;
 
 • Diversitydiversity of background and personal experience;
 
 • Fitfit of abilities and personality with those of current and potential Directorsdirectors in building a Board that is effective, collegial and responsive to the needs of our business; and
 
 • Independenceindependence and an absence of conflicting time commitments.
Director Independence
 
We believe that a substantial majority of our Directorsdirectors should be independent. A Director is deemed to bedirector qualifies as independent ifunless the Board determines that he or she does not have any direct or indirecthas a material commercial or charitable relationship with us based on all relevant facts and circumstances. The Board of Directors makes independence determinations annually based on information supplied by Directorsdirectors and other sources, and on the prior review and recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Nominating/Governance Committee.
 
The Board’s Director independence determinations are guided by certain categorical standards which are set forthcontained in our Corporate Governance Principles andPrinciples. These standards are consistent with New York Stock Exchange listing standards.standards, the national securities exchange on which our common stock is listed.
 
The Board has determined that all currently incumbent Directorsnon-employee directors who served during our 2007 fiscal year and Directorall current director nominees are independent under the Board’s Directordirector independence standards, except Jeffrey T. Mezger, our Presidentstandards. Accordingly, Messrs. Stephen F. Bollenbach, Ronald W. Burkle, Timothy W. Finchem, Kenneth M. Jastrow, II, James A. Johnson, J. Terrence Lanni, Michael G. McCaffery, Leslie Moonves, and Chief Executive Officer.Luis G. Nogales and Ms. Melissa Lora are independent. Dr. Ray R. Irani, who served on the Board until November 1, 2007, was also independent. In addition, the Board has determined that all Committees of the Board except the Executive Committee, which did not regularly meet in the 2006 fiscal year,Committees are entirely composed of independent Directorsdirectors.
In making its independence determinations, the Board considered various transactions for goods and services that we entered into during our 2007 fiscal year with firms or organizations at which some of our non-employee directors served as executive officers. In each case, the transactions were in the ordinary course of our business and the business of the counterpart firm or organization and fell well within the meaningcategorical independence standards


4


contained in our Corporate Governance Principles. In no case was a non-employee director deemed to have a direct or indirect material interest in the transactions. There were no transactions in which any of New York Stock Exchange listing standardsour non-employee directors participated in an individual capacity. The specific goods and Securitiesservices consisted of: hotel rooms obtained in connection with business travel and Exchange Commission rules. Theat standard market rates (Mr. Bollenbach (who served as Chief Executive Committee was comprisedOfficer of Dr. Ray R. Irani and Luis G. Nogales, who are both independent,Hilton Hotels Corporation through October 2007) and Mr. Mezger.Lanni (who serves as Chief Executive Officer of MGM MIRAGE)); radio and billboard advertising expenditures at market rates to promote our business (Mr. Moonves (who serves as Chief Executive Officer of CBS Corporation)); building materials purchased at market prices (for which we received standard purchase rebates) for use in our homebuilding operations (Mr. Jastrow (who served as Chief Executive Officer of Temple-Inland Inc. through December 2007)); and event fees at market rates paid in connection with business-related activities (Mr. Finchem (who serves as Commissioner of the PGA TOUR)).
Corporate Governance Principles
 
In addition to containing our Directordirector independence standards, our Corporate Governance Principles provide the framework within which we conduct our business and pursue our strategic goals. OurThe Nominating/Governance Committee regularly reviews our Corporate Governance Principles, are regularly reviewed by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and the full Board approves changes as it deems appropriate. Our Corporate Governance Principles are available on our website athttp://www.kbhome.com/investor/corporategovernance.
Ethics Policy
 
We expect all of our Directorsdirectors and employees to follow the highest ethical standards when representing KB Home and our interests. To this end, all employees, including our senior executive management, and Directors,our directors must abide by our Ethics Policy. Our Ethics Policy is reviewed regularly by theThe Audit and Compliance Committee of the Board of Directors,(“Audit Committee”) regularly reviews our Ethics Policy, and the full Board approves changes as it deems appropriate. OurThe Board approved amendments to our Ethics Policy was amendedthat became effective as of September 17, 2007. The Ethics Policy is available on September 15, 2006.our website athttp://www.kbhome.com/investor/corporategovernance.

6


Board Meetings, Membership and Attendance
 
The Board held seven10 meetings in our 20062007 fiscal year. As of the date of this Proxy Statement, the Board has 11 members.
In our 2007 fiscal year, each of our directors attended at least 75% of the aggregate number of meetings of the Board and the Board Committees on which he or she served. All Directorsdirectors are expected to attend our Annual Meetings.annual meetings of stockholders. All Directorsdirectors who were serving at the time attended the 2006our 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which was held on April 6, 2006, except for J. Terrence Lanni.5, 2007.
 Each Director attended at least 75% of all Board meetings and of all meetings of the Committees on which he or she served in our 2006 fiscal year, except for Leslie Moonves.
Board Committees
 In our 2006 fiscal year, the
The Board had fourhas three standing Board Committees: Audit and Compliance;Audit; Management Development and Compensation; NominatingCompensation (“Compensation Committee”); and Corporate Governance; and Executive.Nominating/Governance. Each standing Board Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its responsibilities, as described below. The Board has adopted a charter for each standing Board Committee. Each charter is available on our website athttp://www.kbhome.com/investor/corporategovernance.
 
The chart below shows the standing Committeesmembers of the standing Board Committees as of the current membersdate of those Committeesthis Proxy Statement and the number of meetings each standingBoard Committee held during the 2006our 2007 fiscal year. Mr. Bollenbach, the Non-Executive Chairman of the Board, serves as anex officiomember of each standing Board Committee. Mr. Mezger, a
                  
    Management Nominating and  
  Audit and Development and Corporate  
Name of Director Compliance Compensation Governance Executive
 
Independent Directors
                
 Ronald W. Burkle  X       X     
 Timothy W. Finchem  X       X     
 Dr. Ray R. Irani      X*      X*
 Kenneth M. Jastrow, II(a)          X    
 James A. Johnson(b)      X   X*    
 J. Terrence Lanni      X   X     
 Melissa Lora  X             
 Michael G. McCaffery  X*      X     
 Leslie Moonves      X         
 Luis G. Nogales  X   X       X 
Employee Director(c)
                
 Jeffrey T. Mezger              X 
Number of Meetings in Fiscal 2006
  10(d)  3   3   1 
 


5


director and our President and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), does not serve on any of the standing Board Committees.
                
         Nominating/
  Director  Audit  Compensation  Governance 
Mr. Burkle   X         X 
                
Mr. Finchem   X    X      
                
Mr. Jastrow             X 
                
Mr. Johnson             X 
                
Mr. Lanni        X*     
                
Ms. Lora   X         X 
                
Mr. McCaffery   X*   X      
                
Mr. Moonves             X*
                
Mr. Nogales   X    X      
                
                
Number of Meetings:
   9(a)   7    5 
                
X = Member  * = Chair               
X = Member     * = Chair     † = Lead Director
(a)Mr. Jastrow was elected as the independent Lead Director of the Board of Directors on November 12, 2006.
(b) Mr. Johnson served as the Presiding Director of the Board of Directors during the 2006 fiscal year until November 12, 2006.
(c) Mr. Bruce Karatz served as our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer through November 12, 2006. During his tenure on our Board of Directors, Mr. Karatz also served on the Executive Committee. On November 12, 2006, the Board of Directors elected Jeffrey T. Mezger to the Board and to the Executive Committee of the Board and as our President and Chief Executive Officer.
(d) Includes quarterly conference calls with our management to review our earnings releases prior to their release.issuance.

7


 Shown below are the standing Committees of the Board and the members of those Committees effective April 5, 2007.
ManagementNominating and
Audit andDevelopment andCorporate
Name of DirectorComplianceCompensationGovernance
Independent Directors
Ronald W. BurkleXX
Timothy W. FinchemXX
Dr. Ray R. IraniX
Kenneth M. Jastrow, IIX
James A. JohnsonX
J. Terrence LanniX*
Melissa LoraXX
Michael G. McCafferyX*X
Leslie MoonvesX*
Luis G. NogalesXX
Employee Director
Jeffrey T. Mezger
X = Member     * = Chair     † = Lead Director

8


Audit and Compliance Committee.  The Audit and Compliance Committee represents and assists the Board in fulfilling its responsibilities for oversight of our:
 • corporate accounting and reporting practices, including the quality and integrity of our financial statements and reports;
 
 • internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures;
 
 • audit process, including our independent registered public accounting firm’sthe qualifications, independence, retention, compensation and performance of the independent registered public accounting firm employed for the purpose of preparing or issuing an audit report or performing audit, review, attestation or other services for us, and the performance of our internal audit department; and
 
 • compliance with legal and regulatory requirements and management of matters in which we have or may have material liability exposure.
 
The Audit and Compliance Committee also oversees the preparation of a report for inclusion in theour annual proxy statementstatements and is charged with the duties and responsibilities listed in its Charter.charter. The report of the Audit and Compliance CommitteeCommittee’s report is included in this Proxy Statement on page 5154 below. The Audit Committee is a separately designated standing audit committee as defined in Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
 
The Board has determined that each current member of the Audit and Compliance Committee is independent under our Corporate Governance Principles, New York Stock Exchange listing standards and Securities and Exchange Commission rules. The Board has also determined that each current member of the Audit and Compliance Committee is financially literate under New York Stock Exchange listing standards, and that Ms. Lora, an independent director, qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” under Securities and Exchange Commission rules.
 In August 2006, a Subcommittee of the Audit and Compliance Committee was established to conduct a review of our past stock option grant practices in conjunction with independent legal counsel. This Subcommittee met 20 times in fiscal 2006. Mr. Finchem, Ms. Lora and Mr. McCaffery constituted this Subcommittee.
Management Development and Compensation Committee.  The Management Development and Compensation Committee represents and assists the Board in fulfilling its responsibilities for oversight of:with respect to:
 • the evaluation and compensation of corporateour CEO and division officers, including the determination of the nature and amount of awards to be granted under our employee compensation plans; andhis direct reports;
 
• oversight and approval of the general design of our executive compensation and benefit programs;


6


 • our efforts to attract, develop, promote and promoteretain qualified executives.senior executive talent; and
• the evaluation and determination of non-employee director compensation.
 
The Management Development and Compensation Committee also oversees the preparation of a report on executivethe compensation for inclusiondiscussion and analysis to be included in theour annual proxy statementstatements, recommends to the Board whether to so include the compensation discussion and analysis, and provides an accompanying report to be included in our annual proxy statements. The compensation discussion and analysis for this Proxy Statement is provided under the heading “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” on pages 25-35 below. The Compensation Committee’s accompanying report is on page 25 below. The Compensation Committee is also charged with the duties and responsibilities listed in its Charter. charter.
The report of the Management Development andBoard has determined that each current Compensation Committee member is included in this Proxy Statement beginning on page 37 below.
   In addition to being independent under our Corporate Governance Principles and New York Stock Exchange listing standards, the Board has determined that each current member of the Management Development and Compensation Committee is a “non-employee director” under Securities and Exchange Commission rules and is an “outside director” under Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m).
Overview of Executive Officer and Non-Employee Director Compensation Processes and Procedures.  Under our Bylaws, the Board has the authority to fix the compensation of our executive officers and non-employee directors. The Board has delegated this authority to the Compensation Committee to the extent provided in the Compensation Committee’s charter. In accordance with its charter, the Compensation Committee annually reviews and approves the goals and objectives relevant to our CEO’s compensation, evaluates his performance in light of those goals and objectives, and, either as a committee or together with the other independent directors (as directed by the Board), determines and approves our CEO’s incentive compensation based on the evaluation. The Compensation Committee also evaluates, in conjunction with our CEO, the performance of his direct reports and other senior executives, and reviews and approves their compensation.
The Compensation Committee exercises the Board’s authority with respect to our employee compensation and benefits plans (including our employee equity compensation plans) and policies, except to the extent that the Board, in its discretion, reserves its authority. This includes the authority to select eligible participants, recommend and approve grants and awards, set performance targets and other award eligibility criteria, approve an aggregate incentive pool for any annual or long-term incentive awards, interpret the plans’ terms, delegate certain responsibilities and adopt or modify as necessary any rules and procedures to implement the plans, including any rules and procedures that condition the approval of grants and awards. The Compensation Committee also periodically reviews our compensation and benefit plans and, from time to time, will recommend to the Board new plans or modifications to existing plans. The Compensation Committee’s exercise of this authority, including specific considerations applied and determinations made, with respect to the compensation and benefits awarded to our named executive officers under our plans is discussed under the heading “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” on pages 25-35 below.
The Compensation Committee, from time to time, reviews and makes recommendations to the Board regarding non-employee director compensation consistent with the goals of recruiting the highest caliber directors to serve on the Board, aligning directors’ and stockholders’ interests, and fairly paying directors for the work required to serve stockholder interests given our size, scope and complexity of operations.
In carrying out its duties with respect to executive officer and non-employee director compensation, the Compensation Committee seeks assistance from our management and an outside compensation consultant it has engaged directly, Semler Brossy Consulting Group LLC (“Semler Brossy”), as further described under the heading “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” on pages 25-35 below. Under its charter, the Compensation Committee may delegate to a subcommittee or to our management any duties and responsibilities as the Compensation Committee deems to be appropriate and in our best interests. However, under our Equity-Based Award Grant Policy, as further described on page 35 below, the Compensation Committee cannot delegate to our management the authority to grant equity-based awards.


7


Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation.  Messrs. Lanni and Nogales served on the Compensation Committee throughout our 2007 fiscal year. Messrs. Finchem and McCaffery each joined the Compensation Committee on April 5, 2007 and served through the remainder of our 2007 fiscal year. Dr. Irani served as the Chair of the Internal Revenue Code.
Compensation Committee from the beginning of our 2007 fiscal year until April 5, 2007, and then served as a Compensation Committee member until November 1, 2007, when he resigned from the Board. No member of the Management Development and Compensation Committee during our 2007 fiscal year was part of a “compensation committee interlock” during our 2006 fiscal year as described under Securities and Exchange Commission rules. In addition, none of our executive officers served as a director or member of the compensation committee of another

9


entity that would constitute a “compensation committee interlock.”
 
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.  The Nominating and Corporate Nominating/Governance Committee represents and assists the Board in fulfilling its responsibilities to:by:
 • shape and monitor the implementationproviding oversight of our corporate governance policies and practices;
 
 • identifyidentifying, evaluating and investigaterecommending to the Board individuals who are qualified to become Board members, consistent with criteria approved bydirectors, as further described under the Board, and recommend proposed nominees for Board membership;
• assess the Board’s size, operations, structure, needs and effectiveness by, among other things, reviewing and making recommendations as to the membership, purpose and functionsheading “Consideration of Board Committees and overseeing the annual evaluation of the Board’s and its Committees’ respective performance;Director Candidates” below; and
 
 • establishperforming ongoing assessments of the Board’s size, operations, structure, needs and from time to time adjust non-employee Director compensation and benefits in accordance with, among other things, the compensation guidelines set forth in our Governance Principles.effectiveness.
 
The Nominating and Corporate Nominating/Governance Committee also reviews and makes recommendations to the full Board on proposed changes to our AmendedRestated Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws, periodically assesses and recommends action with respect to our stockholder rights plan and other stockholder protections, reviews and approves or ratifies (as applicable) transactions in which we participate and in which certain related parties have a material interest (as further discussed under the heading “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions” on page 56 below), and is charged with the other duties and responsibilities listed in its Charter.charter.
 
The Board has determined that each current member of the Nominating and Corporate Nominating/Governance Committee is independent under our Corporate Governance Principles and New York Stock Exchange listing standards.
 
Executive Committee.Consideration of Director Candidates
The ExecutiveNominating/Governance Committee met once in our 2006 fiscal yearis responsible for identifying and acted periodically by written consent. As partevaluating director candidates on the Board’s behalf. Director candidates may come to the attention of the new corporate governance initiatives discussedNominating/Governance Committee through current Board members or other persons. Candidates are evaluated at regular or special meetings of the Nominating/Governance Committee, and may be considered at any point during the year. The general qualifications for director candidates are described under the heading “Director Qualifications” on page 5 above,4 above.
The Nominating/Governance Committee has retained professional search firms from time to time to assist it with recruiting potential director candidates to the Board of Directors has votedbased on criteria the Nominating/Governance Committee provides to dissolve the Executive Committee effective April 5,firm. These firms help identify, evaluate and select director candidates and are typically paid an agreed upon fee plus expenses for their work. A professional search firm helped recruit Mr. Bollenbach to the Board in 2007.
Any security holder may recommend a director candidate for the Nominating/Governance Committee’s consideration by submitting the candidate’s name and qualifications to us in care of the Corporate Secretary at the address listed under the heading “Communications with the Board” on the next page. The Nominating/Governance Committee will consider director candidates recommended by a security holder in the same manner as it considers any other recommended candidates.
Executive Sessions of IndependentNon-Employee Directors
 The independent Directors have met in executive session without management present as
As part of the Board’s regularly scheduled meetings, and will continue to do so.the non-employee directors meet in executive session. Any independent Directornon-employee director can request additional executive sessions. Until November 12, 2006, Mr. Johnson served asBollenbach, the Board’s Presiding Director and scheduled and chaired executive sessions. Since November 12, 2006, the independent Lead DirectorNon-Executive Chairman of the Board, of Directors, currently Mr. Jastrow, is responsible for scheduling and chairing the executive sessions.


8


Communications with the Board
 You
Any interested party may write to the Board or to any of the independent Directorsnon-employee directors in care of our Corporate Secretary at KB Home, 10990 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90024. The Corporate Secretary or the Assistant Corporate Secretary reviews all such written correspondence promptly upon receipt and will forward it, as they determine is appropriate, to a Board Committee Chair, to an individual Director directorand/or to the Lead Director.Chairman of the Board. Directors who receive such correspondence determine, individually or with other Directors directorsand/or senior executive our management, whether and how to respond.

10


Consideration of Director CandidatesCompensation
 The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for identifying and evaluating Director candidates on the Board’s behalf. Director candidates may come to the attention of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee through current Board members, professional search firms or other persons. These candidates are evaluated at regular or special meetings of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and may be considered at any point during the year.
   Stockholders may recommend a candidate for the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s consideration by submitting the candidate’s name and qualifications to us in care of the Corporate Secretary at the address listed above under the heading “Communications with the Board.” Candidates recommended by stockholders will be evaluated in the same manner as candidates recommended by any other person.
DirectorOverview.  The Board sets non-employee director compensation based on recommendations from the Compensation
   Only Committee. The Compensation Committee has retained Semler Brossy to assist it with designing our compensation and benefit programs, including our non-employee Directors receivedirector compensation for their Board and Committee service.program. Non-employee Directors are compensated on a “Director Year” basis, which is the period between Annual Meetings. Accordingly, the “2006 Director Year” commenced on April 6, 2006, the date of our 2006 Annual Meeting, and will conclude on April 4, 2007, the date before our 2007 Annual Meeting.
   Non-employee Directordirector compensation is currently provided under our 2003 Non-Employee Directors Stock Plan (the “Director(“Director Plan”). Mr. Mezger is not paid for his service as a director.
 The
Under the Director Plan, provides each non-employee Director withdirector is entitled to receive an annual$80,000 cash retainer paid in $20,000 quarterly installments during a Director Year (the period between our annual meetings of $80,000stockholders) and 4,000 stock units that are granted on the date of each annual meeting of stockholders. Each of the Chairs of the Compensation Committee and the Nominating/Governance Committee is entitled to an annualadditional retainer of 600 stock units. The Chair of the Audit Committee is entitled to an additional retainer of 1,000 stock units. A non-employee director who joins the Board or who becomes a Board Committee Chair during a Director Year is entitled to a pro-rated amount of the applicable compensation provided under the Director Plan based on the time remaining in the Director Year.
To promote greater alignment of non-employee director and stockholder interests, the Director Plan allows each non-employee director to elect to receive his or her Director Plan cash retainer in stock units or stock options, and to elect to receive his or her stock unit grant (or Board Committee Chair stock unit retainer grant, if applicable) in stock options. If a non-employee director elects to receive the Director Plan cash retainer in stock units, the director is granted an amount equal to the shares of 4,000 deferred “Stockour common stock that can be purchased with 120% of the retainer’s value based on the common stock’s grant date closing price. The additional incentive over the retainer’s cash value is intended to induce non-employee directors to elect stock units. If a non-employee director elects to the receive the Director Plan cash retainer in stock options, the stock options are granted in an amount equal to approximately four times the shares of our common stock that can be purchased with the retainer’s value based on the common stock’s grant date closing price. In the Board’s judgment, the four-to-one ratio represents an appropriate trade-off for selecting stock options in lieu of cash. If a non-employee director elects to receive any stock unit grants in stock options, the director is granted an amount equal to four times the number of stock units, reflecting what the Board believes is an appropriate trade-off for the greater potential volatility in the value of a stock option over time.
Director Plan Stock Units.” A “Stock Unit” is  Each stock unit provides a contract right to receive a cash payment equal to the fair market value of a share of our Common Stock.
Annual Retainer. Eachcommon stock and a cash dividend equivalent payment at the same time and in the same amount as any cash dividend paid on our common stock. Based on each non-employee director’s election, Director may receive the annual cash retainer in quarterly installments of $20,000Plan stock units will be paid out overin cash only, with the course of a Director Year.
   Underamount paid equal to the aggregate stock units held multiplied by our common stock’s closing price on the last business day before the payment date. Director Plan eachstock units are paid out when a non-employee director leaves the Board.
Director may elect to receive the annual cash retainer in Stock Units or inPlan Stock Options.  If aelected, all Director elects to receive the annual cash retainer in Stock Units, the Stock UnitsPlan stock options are granted at the beginning of each Director Year at a value of 120% of the cash value of the retainerto non-employee directors on the daydate of grant.
   If a non-employee Director elects to receive Stock Options in lieuour annual meetings of the annual cash retainer, the Stock Options are granted at the beginning of each Director Year and will havestockholders with an exercise price equal to theour common stock’s closing price of our Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the date of grant.that date. The number of Stock Options granted is equal to four times the number of shares of our Common Stock that can be acquired with the amount of the annual retainer based on the closing price of our Common Stock on the date of grant.
   Stock Options granted to a non-employee Director under the Director Planstock options are fully vested when granted butand have a15-year term. A non-employee director cannot be exercisedexercise Director Plan stock options until the earlier to occur of (a) the Director’sdirector’s acquisition and continued ownership of at least 5,00010,000 shares of our Common Stock common stockand/or Director Plan stock units and (b) the date the director leaves the Board. Director ceases to serve on our Board. These Stock Options have a term of fifteen years, although theyPlan stock options must be exercised within one year of the date a non-employee director leaves the Board. Based on each non-employee director’s election, Director ceases to serve on our Board.Plan stock options will be paid
Annual Stock Unit Grant. Each non-employee Director receives an annual grant of 4,000 Stock Units at the beginning of each Director Year. A Director may elect to receive the annual Stock Unit grant in Stock Options, as described above.


9

11


   Non-employee Directors are
out in cash only, with the amount paid the equivalent of cash dividends on their Stock Units when cash dividends are paid on shares of our Common Stock. The amount of these cash dividend equivalent payments is equal to the number of Stock Units held multiplied by the amount of the cash dividend paid onpositive difference between a share of our Common Stock. Stock Units granted to a non-employee Director under the Director Plan are paid out in cash when the Director leaves the Board,stock option’s exercise price and the amount paid is equal to the number of Stock Units held multiplied by the closing price of our Common Stockcommon stock on the last business day beforeapplicable exercise date. Accordingly, Director Plan stock options are equivalent in nature to stock appreciation rights.
Chairman Retainer and One-Time Service Payments.  In recognition of his additional responsibilities and service to the payment date.
Committee Chair Retainer. AtBoard, Mr. Bollenbach, the beginning of each Director Year, the ChairNon-Executive Chairman of the Audit and Compliance Committee receivesBoard, is entitled to receive an additional annual retainer of 1,000 Stock Units,$300,000. Mr. Bollenbach may keep any Chairman retainer payment he receives if he is removed from the Board without cause. Also, in 2007 the Board approved a one-time $50,000 cash bonus payment to each member of an Audit Committee subcommittee that directed a review of employee stock option grants (“Review”). This Review is described in our Annual Report onForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2006. The subcommittee members were Messrs. Finchem and McCaffery and Ms. Lora.
Expenses.  We pay the non-employee directors’ expenses, including travel, accommodations and meals, associated with attending all Board and Board Committee meetings and each Chairannual meeting of thestockholders and any other activities related to our business. They do not receive any additional compensation for attending individual Board Committees receives anor Board Committee meetings or for attending our annual retainermeetings of 600 Stock Units. A Committee Chair may elect to receive the Chair Stock Unit grant in Stock Options as described above.stockholders.
 Cash Election. Although
Our 2007 fiscal year non-employee director compensation is provided in the Director Plan provides the non-employee Directors with the option to receive payout of any Stock Units and Stock Options in shares of our Common Stock, all non-employee Directors have elected to receive payouts of currently outstanding stock-based awards granted to them under the Director Plan in cash.following table.
 
Director Compensation During Fiscal Year 2007
                            
   Fees Earned
                   
   or Paid
   Stock
   Option
   All Other
       
   in Cash
   Awards
   Awards
   Compensation
   Total
   
  Name  ($)(a)   ($)(b)   ($)(b)   ($)(c)   ($)   
Mr. Bollenbach  $225,000   $0   $108,755   $0   $333,755   
                            
Mr. Burkle   33,320    (1,026,256)   (2,606,087)   0    (3,599,023)  
                            
Mr. Finchem   61,826    (88,739)   0    16,390    (10,523)  
                            
Mr. Jastrow   59,282    (829,849)   0    13,545    (757,022)  
                            
Mr. Johnson   53,241    (1,364,321)   (3,016,948)   32,181    (4,295,847)  
                            
Mr. Lanni   24,526    (453,505)   0    0    (428,979)  
                            
Ms. Lora   72,112    (405,548)   0    9,960    (323,476)  
                            
Mr. McCaffery   66,102    (283,391)   (214,288)   13,545    (418,032)  
                            
Mr. Moonves   22,562    (393,014)   0    16,390    (354,062)  
                            
Mr. Nogales   55,080    (1,420,962)   (48,394)   0    (1,414,276)  
                            
                            
Former Non-Employee Director
                           
Dr. Irani   93,047    (1,738,968)   (1,094,079)   0    (2,740,000)  
                            
(a)Fees Earned or Paid in Cash:  Except as discussed in this footnote, the amounts reported in this column reflect the aggregate Director Plan stock unit dividend equivalent payments paid to non-employee directors during our 2007 fiscal year. Non-employee directors who have accumulated larger Director Plan stock unit holdings based on their tenure and their annual elections received higher aggregate dividend equivalent payments. The amount reported for Mr. Bollenbach reflects only the portion of his $300,000 annual Chairman retainer paid in our 2007 fiscal year. We will pay the remaining $75,000 prior to the date of the Annual Meeting. The respective amounts reported for Messrs. Finchem and McCaffery and Ms. Lora also include the one-time $50,000 payment each received for their service in directing the Review. The amount reported for Dr. Irani also includes the pro-rated annual cash retainer he was paid for his service in the 2007 Director Year corresponding to his resignation from the Board on November 1, 2007. Dr. Irani was the only non-employee director who


10


elected to receive his 2007 Director Year annual retainer in cash. The 2007 Director Year began on April 5, 2007, the date of our 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and it ends on April 2, 2008.
(b)Stock and Option Awards:  The amounts reported in each of these columns reflect the aggregate compensation expense we recognized in our 2007 fiscal year for Director Plan stock unit and stock option awards, respectively, computed in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004),“Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123(R)”) (disregarding estimates of forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions). Information used in determining these amounts can be found in Note 15 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in our Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2007. The negative values reported in these columns are due to the decline in the market price of our common stock between November 30, 2006 and November 30, 2007. The Director Plan stock units and stock options were granted on April 5, 2007, the date of our 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Listed below are the respective Director Plan stock units and stock options granted to each non-employee director in accordance with their elections and the corresponding grant date fair value computed in accordance with SFAS 123(R).
                  
         Grant Date
  
   Stock Units
  Stock Options
  Fair Value
  
  Name  (#)  (#)  ($)  
Mr. Bollenbach   0    23,540   $455,264   
                  
Mr. Burkle   0    23,540    455,264   
                  
Mr. Finchem   6,263    0    265,676   
                  
Mr. Jastrow   6,263    0    265,676   
                  
Mr. Johnson   6,263    0    265,676   
                  
Mr. Lanni   6,863    0    291,128   
                  
Ms. Lora   6,263    0    265,676   
                  
Mr. McCaffery   0    27,540    532,624   
                  
Mr. Moonves   6,863    0    291,128   
                  
Mr. Nogales   6,263    0    265,676   
                  
                  
Former Non-Employee Director
                 
Dr. Irani   2,334    0    99,008   
                  
Mr. Lanni received an additional 600 stock units for his service as the Compensation Committee Chair and Mr. Moonves received an additional 600 stock units for his service as the Nominating/Governance Committee Chair. Mr. McCaffery received 4,000 stock options for his service as Audit Committee Chair by electing to receive his 1,000 stock unit retainer grant in stock options. As required under the Director Plan, Dr. Irani forfeited 1,666 stock units due to his resignation from the Board on November 1, 2007. All other stock unit and stock option amounts reflect the Director Plan cash retainer and stock unit grant the non-employee directors elected to receive in Director Plan stock units or, for Messrs. Bollenbach, Burkle and McCaffery, in Director Plan stock options.


11


Listed below are each respective non-employee director’s aggregate Director Plan stock unit and stock option holdings as of February 25, 2008.
                  
         Total
  
   Stock Units
  Stock Options
  Holdings
  
  Name  (#)  (#)  (#)  
Mr. Bollenbach   0    23,540    23,540   
                  
Mr. Burkle   33,320    165,155    198,475   
                  
Mr. Finchem   13,392    0    13,392   
                  
Mr. Jastrow   37,454    0    37,454   
                  
Mr. Johnson   54,807    143,957    198,764   
                  
Mr. Lanni   26,242    0    26,242   
                  
Ms. Lora   23,678    0    23,678   
                  
Mr. McCaffery   9,201    73,609    82,810   
                  
Mr. Moonves   24,278    0    24,278   
                  
Mr. Nogales   56,646    2,130    58,776   
                  
Upon his resignation from the Board on November 1, 2007, and in accordance with his elections and the Director Plan’s terms, we paid Dr. Irani $1,591,801 for the 61,507 stock units he held on November 1, 2007 based on the $25.88 closing price of our common stock on that date. Dr. Irani also held 37,628 Director Plan stock options on November 1, 2007 with various exercise prices. Dr. Irani exercised 36,182 of these Director Plan stock options on January 18, 2008, and we paid him $186,760 in cash, the sum total of the respective positive differences between the Director Plan stock options’ exercise prices and the $18.52 closing price of our common stock on the exercise date. Dr. Irani has until October 31, 2008 to exercise his remaining 1,446 Director Plan stock options. If he exercises his remaining Director Plan stock options, we will pay Dr. Irani the sum total of the respective positive differences between the Director Plan stock options’ exercise prices and the closing price of our common stock on the exercise date.
(c)All Other Compensation:  The amounts reported in this column represent premium payments for the life insurance policies we maintain to fund charitable donations under the Directors Legacy Program, which is described below. Messrs. Bollenbach and Lanni do not participate in the program. No additional premium payments are currently required for the program donations for each of Messrs. Burkle and Nogales and Dr. Irani. In our 2007 fiscal year, we paid a total of $201,214 in life insurance premiums for all participants, including former directors. Premium payments vary depending on participants’ respective ages and other factors. The total dollar amount payable under the program at November 30, 2007 was $15,700,000. If all current participating directors were vested in the full donation amount, the total dollar amount payable under the program at November 30, 2007 would have been $17,300,000.
Directors Legacy Program. Under our  We established a Directors Legacy Program in 1995 to recognize our and our directors’ interests in supporting worthy educational institutions and other charitable organizations. In making adjustments to our philanthropic activities, the Board elected in 2007 to close the program to new participants. Messrs. Bollenbach, Lanni and Mezger do not participate in the program. Under the program, we will make a charitable donation on each Director’sparticipating director’s behalf of up to $1,000,000. Each$1,000,000 (up to $500,000 for a participating director who left the Board before January 1, 1999). A participating director may allocate the donation can be allocated to up to five qualifying institutions or organizations of the Director’s choice upon his or her death.organizations. Directors vest in the full donation in five equal annual installments of $200,000, and therefore must serve on the Board for five consecutive years to be able to donate the maximum amount.
   The Board of Directors has elected Donations are paid directly to closedesignated organizations after a participating director’s death with proceeds from the Directors Legacy Program to new participants,life insurance policies we maintain on each participating director’s life. Participating directors and their families do not receive any future Directors will not be eligible to participate.
Copies of Governance Principles, Ethics Policy and Board Committee Charters
   Copies of our Governance Principles, Ethics Policy and all Board Committee Charters can be viewed on and downloaded from our website at http://www.kbhome.com/investor. Stockholders may request free print copies of our Governance Principles, Ethics Policy and Board Committee Charters by writing to the Corporate Secretary at the address listed above under the heading “Communicationsproceeds, compensation or tax savings associated with the Board.”program.


12

12


Proposals to beTo Be Voted onOn
Proposal 1:
Election of Directors
 
 
At the Annual Meeting, the Board of Directors will present as nominees and recommend to stockholders that each of Messrs. Burkle, MoonvesBollenbach, Finchem and NogalesLanni each be elected as Class III Directors to serve for a three-year term ending at the 2010 Annual Meeting, and that Dr. Irani be elected as a Class I Directordirectors to serve for a one-year term ending at the 2008our 2009 Annual Meeting.Meeting of Stockholders. Each nominee is currently a Director, is standing for re-election,director, has consented to being nominated and has agreed to serve as a Directordirector if elected. Messrs. Finchem and Lanni are standing for re-election. Mr. Bollenbach was appointed to the Board subsequent to our 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Should any of these nominees become unable to serve as a Directordirector prior to the Annual Meeting, the persons named as proxies on the enclosed Proxy Cardproxy cards for the Annual Meeting will, unless otherwise directed, vote for the election of such other person as the Board of Directors may recommend in place of such nominee. Although Dr. Irani
Mr. Johnson has reacheddecided to retire from the retirement ageBoard effective as of the date of the Annual Meeting, when his current term as a director expires. On the date of the Annual Meeting, the Board will have 10 members.
Vote Required
Under our Bylaws, the election of each director nominee will require a majority of votes cast at the Annual Meeting to be in favor of the nominee (i.e.,the votes cast for Directors undera nominee’s election must exceed the votes cast against the nominee’s election).
Consistent with this director election standard, our Corporate Governance Principles require that each director nominee in an uncontested election at an annual meeting of stockholders receive more votes cast for than against his or her election or re-election in order to be elected or re-elected to the Board. An “uncontested election” is one in which no director candidates on the ballot were nominated by a stockholder in accordance with our Bylaws. This election is an uncontested election.
Our Corporate Governance Principles also provide that a director nominee who fails to win election or re-election to the Board believes itin an uncontested election is expected to tender his or her resignation from the Board. If an incumbent director fails to receive the required vote for election or re-election in ouran uncontested election, the Nominating/Governance Committee will act on an expedited basis to determine whether to accept the director’s resignation and our stockholders’ best interestswill submit its recommendation for prompt consideration by the Board. The Board expects the director whose resignation is under consideration to abstain from participating in any decision regarding that Dr. Irani continues to serve onresignation. The Nominating/Governance Committee and the Board until the 2008 Annual Meeting.
Vote Requiredmay consider any factors they deem relevant in deciding whether to accept a director’s resignation.
 The election of each Director nominee will require the affirmative vote of a plurality of shares of Common Stock present or represented at the Annual Meeting.
Your Board recommends a vote FOR the election to the Board of each of the following nominees.


13


A brief summary of each nominee’s principal occupation, recent professional experience and their directorships at other public companies, if any, is provided below.
 
   
(Photo of Ron Burkle)
Photo of Stephen F. Bollenbach
 Stephen F. Bollenbach, age 65, was the Co-Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Hilton Hotels Corporation, positions he held from May 2004 and February 1996, respectively. He retired from Hilton in October of 2007. Prior to joining Hilton, Mr. Bollenbach was Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for The Walt Disney Company from 1995 to 1996. Before Disney, Mr. Bollenbach was President and Chief Executive Officer of Host Marriott Corporation from 1993 to 1995, and served as Chief Financial Officer of Marriott Corporation from 1992 to 1993. From 1990 to 1992, Mr. Bollenbach was Chief Financial Officer of the Trump Organization. Mr. Bollenbach serves a director of Harrah’s Entertainment, Inc., Time Warner Inc., Macy’s, Inc. and American International Group, Inc. Mr. Bollenbach joined the Board as Chairman in 2007.
Ron Burkle, age 54, is the founder and managing partner of The Yucaipa Companies, a private investment firm based in Southern California. Yucaipa specializes in acquisitions, mergers and management of large retail, manufacturing and distribution companies. Mr. Burkle has served as Chairman of the Board and controlling shareholder of numerous companies including Alliance Entertainment, Dominick’s, Fred Meyer, Ralphs and Food4Less. He is currently a member of the board of Occidental Petroleum Corporation, Yahoo! Inc. and Kaufman & Broad S.A., the Company’s publicly-traded French subsidiary. He has been a Director of the Company since 1995.

13


   

(Photo of Dr. Ray R. Irani)
Photo of Timothy W. Finchem
 Timothy W. Finchem,age 60, has been Commissioner of the PGA TOUR since 1994. He joined the TOUR staff as Vice President of Business Affairs in 1987, and was promoted to Deputy Commissioner and Chief Operating Officer in 1989. Mr. Finchem served in the White House as Deputy Advisor to the President in the Office of Economic Affairs in 1978 and 1979, and in the early 1980’s, co-founded the National Marketing and Strategies Group in Washington, D.C. He joined the Board in 2005.
Dr. Ray R. Irani, age 72, is Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Occidental Petroleum Corporation. He joined Occidental in 1983 as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Occidental Chemical Corporation, an Occidental subsidiary, and as Executive Vice President of Occidental. In 1984 he was elected to the Board of Directors of Occidental and was named President and Chief Operating Officer. He assumed the responsibilities of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer in 1990, and the additional position of President in 2005. Dr. Irani was Chairman of the Board of Directors of Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd., an Occidental affiliate, from 1987 to 1999. Dr. Irani is a director of Kaufman & Broad S.A., the Company’s publicly-traded French subsidiary. Dr. Irani has been a Director of the Company since 1992.

(Photo of Leslie Moonves)
Leslie Moonves, age 57, is President and Chief Executive Officer and a Director of CBS Corporation and most recently was Co-President and Co-Chief Operating Officer of Viacom, which title he held from June 2004 to December 2005. Mr. Moonves previously served as President and Chief Executive Officer of CBS from 1998 to 2004, and served as its Chairman from 2003 to 2005, with responsibility for UPN since January 2002. He joined CBS in 1995 as President, CBS Entertainment. Prior to that, Mr. Moonves was President of Warner Bros. Television from 1993, when Warner Bros. and Lorimar Television combined operations. From 1989 to 1993, he was president of Lorimar Television. Mr. Moonves joined the Board in 2004.

14


   
(Photo of Luis Nogales)
Photo of Terrence Lanni,
 J. Terrence Lanni,age 64, has been Chairman of MGM MIRAGE since July 1995, and Chief Executive Officer from June 1995 to December 1999, and since March 2000. Before joining MGM MIRAGE, Mr. Lanni was President and Chief Operating Officer of Caesars World, Inc. from April 1981 to February 1995. Mr. Lanni has been a director since 2003.
Luis G. Nogales, age 63, is the Managing Partner of Nogales Investors, LLC, a private equity investment firm. He was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Embarcadero Media, Inc. from 1992 to 1997, President of Univision Communications, Inc., from 1986 to 1988, and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of United Press International from 1983 to 1986. He is a director of Edison International, Southern California Edison, Arbitron, and Kaufman & Broad S.A., the Company’s publicly-traded French subsidiary. Mr. Nogales has been a Director of the Company since 1995.

15


 
Listed below are our other incumbent Directorsdirectors who will continue to serve on the Board following the Annual Meeting and their respective principal occupations, business affiliations and other information for at least the past five years.
 
   
(Photo of Timothy W. Finchem)
Photo of Ron Burkle,
 Ron Burkle,age 55, is the founder and managing partner of The Yucaipa Companies, a private investment firm based in Southern California. Yucaipa specializes in acquisitions, mergers and management of large retail, manufacturing and distribution companies. Mr. Burkle has served as Chairman of the Board and controlling shareholder of numerous companies including Alliance Entertainment, Dominick’s, Fred Meyer, Ralphs and Food4Less. He is currently a member of the boards of Occidental Petroleum Corporation and Yahoo! Inc. He has been a director since 1995 and his current term expires in 2010.
Timothy W. Finchem,age 59, has been Commissioner of the PGA TOUR since 1994. He joined the TOUR staff as Vice President of Business Affairs in 1987, and was promoted to Deputy Commissioner and Chief Operating Officer in 1989. Mr. Finchem served in the White House as Deputy Advisor to the President in the Office of Economic Affairs in 1978 and 1979, and in the early 1980’s, co-founded the National Marketing and Strategies Group in Washington, D.C. He joined the Board in May 2005 and his current term expires in 2008.

(Photo of Kenneth M. Jastrow II)
Kenneth M. Jastrow, II,age 59, has been Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Temple-Inland Inc. since 2000. Prior to that, Mr. Jastrow served as President and Chief Operating Officer in 1998 and 1999, Group Vice President from 1995 until 1998, and as Chief Financial Officer of Temple-Inland from November 1991 until 1999. Mr. Jastrow is also a director of MGIC Investment Corporation. He joined the Board in December 2001 and was elected Lead Director in November 2006. His current term expires in 2009.

16


   
(Photo of James A. Johnson)
Photo of Kenneth M. Jastrow,
 Kenneth M. Jastrow, II,age 60, currently Non-Executive Chairman of Guaranty Financial Group Inc. and Forestar Real Estate Group Inc., served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Temple-Inland Inc. from 2000 to 2007. Prior to that, Mr. Jastrow served as President and Chief Operating Officer in 1998 and 1999, Group Vice President from 1995 until 1998, and as Chief Financial Officer of Temple-Inland from November 1991 until 1999. Mr. Jastrow is also a director of MGIC Investment Corporation. He joined the Board in 2001 and his current term expires in 2009.
James A. Johnson,age 63, has been Vice Chairman of Perseus LLC, a merchant banking and private equity firm, since 2001. In 2000, Mr. Johnson served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Johnson Capital Partners, a private investment company. Mr. Johnson was employed by Fannie Mae from 1990 through 1999, where he served as Vice Chairman in 1990, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer from 1991 through 1998 and Chairman of the Executive Committee of the Board in 1999. He serves on the boards of Target Corporation, UnitedHealth Group, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., and Temple-Inland Inc. Mr. Johnson has been a member of the Board of Directors since 1992 and his current term expires in 2008.


14

(J. Terrence Lanni)
J. Terrence Lanni,age 63, has been Chairman of MGM MIRAGE since July 1995, and Chief Executive Officer from June 1995 to December 1999, and since March 2000. Before joining MGM MIRAGE, Mr. Lanni was President and Chief Operating Officer of Caesars World, Inc. from April 1981 to February 1995. Mr. Lanni has been a Director of the Company since 2003 and his current term expires in 2008.

17


   
Photo of Melissa Lora,
 Melissa Lora,age 45, is the Chief Financial Officer of Taco Bell Corp., a position that she has held since 2001. Ms. Lora joined Taco Bell Corp. in 1987 and has held various positions throughout the company, most recently acting as Regional Vice President and General Manager from 1998 to 2000 for Taco Bell’s operations throughout the Northeastern United States. Ms. Lora joined the Board in 2004 and her current term expires in 2009.
Melissa Lora,age 44, is the Chief Financial Officer of Taco Bell Corp., a position that she has held since 2001. Ms. Lora joined Taco Bell Corp. in 1987 and has held various positions throughout the company, most recently acting as Regional Vice President and General Manager from 1998 to 2000 for Taco Bell’s operations throughout the Northeastern United States. Ms. Lora joined the Board of Directors in April 2004 and her current term expires in 2009.

(Photo of Michael G. McCaffery)
Michael G. McCaffery,age 53, is the Chief Executive Officer of Makena Capital Management. From 2000 to 2006, Mr. McCaffery was President and CEO of the Stanford Management Company (SMC), which was established in 1991 to manage Stanford University’s financial and real estate investments. Previous to joining SMC, Mr. McCaffery was President and Chief Executive Officer of Robertson Stephens Investment Bankers from January 1993 to December 1999, and also served as Chairman from January 2000 to December 2000. Mr. McCaffery is a director of the Lucile Salter Packard Children’s Hospital, Thomas Weisel Partners Group, Inc., Western Technology Ventures, Savvian, LLC and RS Investment Trust, and is a member of the Advisory Boards of Accel Ventures, Silver Lake Partners, Stanford University’s Graduate School of Business and Princeton University’s Bendheim Institute of Finance. Mr. McCaffery was elected to the Board of Directors in 2003, and his current term expires in 2009.

18


   
(Photo of Jeffrey T. Mezger)
Photo of Michael G. McCaffery,
Michael G. McCaffery,age 54, is the Chief Executive Officer of Makena Capital Management. From 2000 to 2006, Mr. McCaffery was President and CEO of the Stanford Management Company (SMC), which was established in 1991 to manage Stanford University’s financial and real estate investments. Previous to joining SMC, Mr. McCaffery was President and Chief Executive Officer of Robertson Stephens Investment Bankers from January 1993 to December 1999, and also served as Chairman from January 2000 to December 2000. Mr. McCaffery is a director of the Lucile Salter Packard Children’s Hospital, Thomas Weisel Partners Group, Inc., Western Technology Ventures, Savvian, LLC and RS Investment Trust, is a member of the Advisory Boards of Accel Ventures, Silver Lake Partners and Stanford University’s Graduate School of Business, and serves as a trustee for the Rhodes Trust. Mr. McCaffery was elected to the Board in 2003 and his current term expires in 2009.
  
Jeffrey T. Mezger, age 51,
Photo of Jeffrey T. Mezger,
Jeffrey T. Mezger,age 52, has been our President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company since November 2006. Prior to becoming President and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Mezger served as the Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company, a position he assumed in 1999. From 1995 until 1999, Mr. Mezger held a number of executive posts in the Company’s southwest region, including Division President, Phoenix Division, and Senior Vice President and Regional General Manager over Arizona and Nevada. Mr. Mezger joined the Company in 1993 as president of the Antelope Valley Division in Southern California. Mr. Mezger is a member of the executive board of the USC Lusk Center for Real Estate and is on the Policy Advisory Board for the Harvard Joint Center for Housing Studies. He is also a member of the NAHB High Production Builders Council and has served as an officer on numerous boards of the NAHB. Mr. Mezger is a director of Kaufman & Broad SA, the Company’s publicly-traded French subsidiary. Mr. Mezger has been a Director of the Company since November 2006. Prior to becoming President and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Mezger served as our Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, a position he assumed in 1999. From 1995 until 1999, Mr. Mezger held a number of executive posts in our southwest region, including Division President, Phoenix Division, and Senior Vice President and Regional General Manager over Arizona and Nevada. Mr. Mezger joined us in 1993 as president of the Antelope Valley Division in Southern California. Mr. Mezger is a member of the executive board of the USC Lusk Center for Real Estate, is on the Policy Advisory Board for the Harvard Joint Center for Housing Studies, is a member of the California Business Roundtable and is a member of the Milken Institute California Advisory Council. He is also a member of the NAHB High Production Builders Council and has served as an officer on numerous boards of the NAHB. Mr. Mezger has been a director since 2006 and his current term expires in 2009.

Photo of Leslie Moonves,
Leslie Moonves,age 58, is President and Chief Executive Officer and a Director of CBS Corporation and most recently was Co-President and Co-Chief Operating Officer of Viacom, which title he held from June 2004 to December 2005. Mr. Moonves previously served as President and Chief Executive Officer of CBS from 1998 to 2004, and served as its Chairman from 2003 to 2005. He joined CBS in 1995 as President, CBS Entertainment. Prior to that, Mr. Moonves was President of Warner Bros. Television from 1993, when Warner Bros. and Lorimar Television combined operations. From 1989 to 1993, he was President of Lorimar Television. Mr. Moonves joined the Board in 2004 and his current term expires in 2010.
Photo of Luis G. Nogales,
Luis G. Nogales,age 64, is the Managing Partner of Nogales Investors, LLC, a private equity investment firm. He was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Embarcadero Media, Inc. from 1992 to 1997, President of Univision Communications, Inc., from 1986 to 1988, and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of United Press International from 1983 to 1986. He is a director of Southern California Edison Co., Edison International and Arbitron Inc. Mr. Nogales has been a director since 1995 and his current term expires in 2010.


15

19


Proposal 2:
Approval of an Amendment to the Amended Certificate of Incorporation of KB Home to Declassify the Board of Directors and Provide for the Annual Election of Directors
    The Board of Directors has recently taken a number of actions to strengthen our corporate governance. These initiatives are discussed on page 5 above. As part of these initiatives, the Board of Directors proposes to amend our Amended Certificate of Incorporation to declassify the Board of Directors and provide for the annual election of Directors.
   Our current Amended Certificate of Incorporation divides the Board of Directors into three classes, and provides that each Director be elected for three-year terms within his or her respective class. The action described above would amend the Amended Certificate of Incorporation to eliminate these classes and provide for the annual election of Directors.
   Although the current classification of Directors has served KB Home well, the Board believes approval of the proposed amendment, as described below, will enhance KB Home’s corporate governance and will bring KB Home’s method of electing Directors in line with many U.S. public companies.
Proposed Amendment
   To implement this proposal, the Board has adopted resolutions approving and declaring the advisability of amending our Amended Certificate of Incorporation, subject to stockholder approval, as follows:
      RESOLVED, that the Amended Certificate of Incorporation of KB Home be amended to declassify the Board of Directors and provide for the annual election of directors and for this purpose each of Paragraph (c) and Paragraph (d) of Article Fifth thereof shall be struck out in its entirety and will be replaced with the following new Paragraph (c) of Article Fifth:
      FIFTH: (c) Except as provided herein or in the Corporation’s Bylaws, or as permitted by the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, the directors shall be elected at each annual meeting of stockholders. Each director so elected shall hold office until his or her term expires and his or her successor is duly elected and qualified, or until his or her earlier death, resignation or removal. After the annual meeting of stockholders in 2007, all directors will be elected for a one-year term expiring at the next annual meeting of stockholders; provided, that nothing in this paragraph (c) of Article Fifth will shorten the term of any director elected at or prior to the annual meeting of stockholders in 2007.
   This proposal requires the approval of at least 80% of all outstanding shares of our Common Stock. If this proposal is not approved, the current classified structure will remain in place.
Declassification Process
   If this proposal is approved, the declassification of the Board of Directors will occur as follows:
      (a) the Directors elected at this Annual Meeting and all incumbent Directors will continue to serve the remainder of their respective terms; and

20


      (b) beginning with the 2008 Annual Meeting, Directors will be elected annually, so that by the 2010 Annual Meeting all Directors will be elected annually.
   In addition, if this proposal is approved by stockholders, the Board will undertake to amend KB Home’s Bylaws to eliminate the Board classification provisions contained therein, which follow those currently contained in our Amended Certificate of Incorporation.
Vote Required
   Approval of the proposed amendment to our Amended Certificate of Incorporation requires the affirmative vote of at least 80% of the outstanding shares of our Common Stock.
Your Board recommends a vote FOR the approval of the proposed amendment to our Amended Certificate of Incorporation.

21


Proposal 3:
Approval of an Amendment to the Amended Certificate of Incorporation of KB Home to Eliminate its “Fair Price” Provision and
Related Supermajority Vote Requirements
    The Board of Directors has recently taken a number of actions to strengthen our corporate governance. These initiatives are discussed on page 5 above. As part of these initiatives, to enhance KB Home’s corporate governance, the Board of Directors proposes to amend our Amended Certificate of Incorporation to eliminate its “fair price” provision. If stockholders approve this proposal and the above proposal to amend our Amended Certificate of Incorporation to declassify the Board and provide for the annual election of directors, our Amended Certificate of Incorporation would no longer contain any provisions that require a supermajority vote of stockholders (i.e., 80% of all outstanding capital stock) to undertake corporate actions or transactions.
   The Board believes approval of the proposed amendment, as described below, will bring KB Home in line with many U.S. public companies, where actions requiring stockholder approval can be made by holders of a majority of our outstanding stock.
The “Fair Price” Provision
   Article Eighth of our Amended Certificate of Incorporation, which is sometimes referred to as a “fair price” provision, requires the affirmative vote of the holders of not less than 80% of our outstanding capital stock to approve certain transactions involving any person or group that beneficially owns an aggregate of 20% or more of our outstanding capital stock (a “Related Person”).
   The current 80% supermajority approval requirement of Article Eighth applies to the following transactions between a Related Person and KB Home:
• any merger or consolidation of KB Home or a KB Home subsidiary;
• any sale, lease, exchange, transfer or other disposition, including without limitation a mortgage or any other security device, of all or any substantial part of the assets either of KB Home (including without limitation any voting securities of a subsidiary) or a KB Home subsidiary;
• a voluntary liquidation or dissolution of KB Home;
• any sale, lease, exchange, transfer or other disposition, including without limitation by way of a mortgage or other security device, of all or any substantial part of the assets of a Related Person;
• certain issuances of any securities of KB Home or a KB Home subsidiary other than the issuance on a pro rata basis to all holders of stock of the same class pursuant to a stock split or stock dividend; and
• any transaction that would have the effect directly or indirectly of increasing the voting power of a Related Person.
   The 80% supermajority approval requirement does not apply to transactions (a) approved by two-thirds of the Continuing Directors (directors who were directors prior to the time the Related Person became a Related Person), or (b) in which the cash or fair market value of the property,

22


securities or other consideration to be received by stockholders (as determined by two-thirds of the Continuing Directors) is not less than the highest price per share paid at any time by the Related Person (as determined by two-thirds of the Continuing Directors) in acquiring any of its holdings of KB Home capital stock, inclusive of brokerage commissions, transfer taxes, fees and other costs paid in connection with such purchases.
Effect of Eliminating the “Fair Price” Provision
   The repeal of Article Eighth will have two primary effects on stockholder voting. First, those transactions covered by Article Eighth that would otherwise require a stockholder vote under the Delaware General Corporation Law would require the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of our outstanding stock present or represented at a stockholder meeting, rather than an 80% supermajority vote.
   Second, since the 80% supermajority vote requirement would no longer apply, the Board of Directors would be able to effect, without obtaining stockholder approval, those transactions covered by Article Eighth that do not otherwise require stockholder approval under Delaware law.
   KB Home will continue to be subject to Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law without regard to whether the proposed amendments are approved. Section 203 provides, in general, that a transaction constituting a “business combination” within the meaning of Section 203 involving a person owning 15% or more of our voting stock (referred to as an “interested stockholder”), cannot be completed for a period of three years after the date the person became an interested stockholder unless (a) the Board approved either the business combination or the transaction that resulted in the person becoming an interested stockholder prior to such business combination or transaction, (b) upon consummation of the transaction that resulted in the person becoming an interested stockholder, that person owned at least 85% of our outstanding voting stock (excluding shares owned by persons who are directors and also officers of KB Home and shares owned by certain KB Home employee benefit plans), or (c) the business combination was approved by the Board and by the affirmative vote of at least 662/3% of our outstanding voting stock not owned by the interested stockholder.
Proposed Amendment
   To implement this proposal, the Board has adopted resolutions approving and declaring the advisability of amending our Amended Certificate of Incorporation, subject to stockholder approval, as follows:
      RESOLVED, that the Amended Certificate of Incorporation of KB Home be amended to eliminate its fair price provision and related supermajority voting requirements, and for this purpose Article Eighth thereof shall be struck out in its entirety and the remaining Articles of the Amended Certificate of Incorporation will be renumbered sequentially as appropriate.
Vote Required
   Approval of the proposed amendment to our Amended Certificate of Incorporation will require the affirmative vote of at least 80% of the outstanding shares of our Common Stock.
Your Board recommends a vote FOR the approval of the proposed amendment to our Amended Certificate of Incorporation.

23


Proposal 4:
Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
The Audit and Compliance Committee of the Board of Directors has appointed Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm to audit our consolidated financial statements for theour fiscal year ending November 30, 2007.2008. During our 20062007 fiscal year, Ernst & Young LLP served as our independent registered public accounting firm and also provided certain other audit relatedaudit-related services. See “Independent Auditor Fees and Services” on page 5255 below. Representatives of Ernst & Young LLP are expected to attend the Annual Meeting, be available to respond to appropriate questions and, if they desire, to make a statement.
 
Although not required by our charterRestated Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws, we are seeking stockholder ratification of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm. We are doing so, asAs we have done in prior years, we are doing so because we believe it is a matter of good corporate governance. If the stockholders doErnst & Young LLP’s appointment is not ratify the appointment,ratified, the Audit and Compliance Committee will reconsider whether to retain Ernst & Young LLP, but still may retain them. Even if the appointment is ratified, the Audit and Compliance Committee, in its discretion, may change the appointment at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in our and our stockholders’ best interests.
Vote Required
 
Approval of the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for theour fiscal year ending November 30, 20072008 requires the affirmative vote of the majority of shares of Common Stockcommon stock present or represented, and entitled to vote thereon, at the Annual Meeting.
 
Your Board recommends a vote FOR the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for theour fiscal year ending November 30, 2007.2008.


16

24


Proposal 5:3:
Stockholder Proposal
 
The International Brotherhood of Electrical WorkersMassachusetts Laborers’ Pension Benefit Fund, 900 Seventh Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20001,14 New England Executive Park, Suite 200, P.O. Box 4000, Burlington, MA01803-0900, the beneficial owner of 1,7581,340 shares of our Common Stock,common stock, has notified us that it intends to present a proposal at the Annual Meeting. The proposal is set forth below, along with the recommendation of ourthe Board of Directors that you vote AGAINST the proposal. We accept no responsibility for the accuracy of the proposal or the proponent’s supporting statement.
Stockholder Proposal
 
RESOLVED:  TheThat the shareholders of KB Home urge(“Company”) request that the Board of Directors toDirector’s Executive Compensation Committee adopt a policy under which senior executives and directors commit to hold throughout their tenure at least 75 percent of all KB Home shares that they obtainPay for Superior Performance principle by exercising stock options or receiving other equity-based compensation. The board shall implement this policy in a manner that does not violate any existing employment agreement or equity compensation plan. In adopting such a policy, it is requested that the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors shall report to stockholders regarding the adoption of such a policy and other information relevant to the proposal, before the KB Home 2008 annual meeting.
Proponent’s Supporting Statement
   The role of equity-basedestablishing an executive compensation has come under close scrutiny in recent years, inasmuch as stock options can provide incentives to senior executives that differ from the interests of stockholders. Option grants promise executives all of the gain of share price increases with none of the risk of share price declines. Thus, option grants can encourage actions to boost short-term performance.
   This resolution proposes to align the interest of directors and senior executives more closely with the interest of shareholders by asking KB Home to adopt a policy that its directors and senior executives will hold throughout their tenure at least 75 percent of the KB Home shares that they obtain by exercising options or receiving other equity-based compensation. This policy, which is similar to one adopted at Cooper Industries, thus seeks to decouple equity compensationplan for senior executives and directors from short-term price movements, to encourage an emphasis on longer-term gains, and to give directors and executives some flexibility with respect to their holdings.(“Plan”) that does the following:
 We view this reform as necessary, particularly in light of the recent events such as KB Home’s October 10, 2006 disclosure that it improperly accounted for stock option grants awarded to corporate officers (including CEO Bruce Karatz) and may need to restate previous earnings as a result. This follows the Company’s confirmation in August that it was the subject of an SEC investigation regarding stock-option grants. Even if these past stock-option grants and transactions were entirely lawful, these practices raise serious governance concerns and suggest that senior executives may be operating on a short-term horizon.
   We believe that it is reasonable for KB Home to ask its senior executives and directors to ensure and to demonstrate their confidence in the Company’s future, and increased accountability, by requiring them to hold on to 75% of their equity-based compensation for the duration of their tenure at KB Home.
   We urge you to vote FOR this resolution.

25


Recommendation of the Board of Directors AGAINST the Proposal
   Your Board of Directors recommends a vote AGAINST this proposal.
   The Board, which oversees non-employee Director and executive compensation, shares the proponent’s view that equity compensation and mandatory equity ownership for executives and non-employee Directors promotes accountability and encourages them to enhance stockholder value. For this reason, KB Home already requires its executives and Directors to own significant amounts of its Common Stock, and has done so for years.
Executive Stock Ownership Requirements. Executives must own stock with a value equal to a certain multiple of their base salary. This multiple increases with seniority. Currently, the ownership target for most senior executives is 5 times their base salary. The current President and Chief Executive Officer must own 10 times his base salary. Executives who are subject to a stock ownership requirement may not sell or otherwise dispose of any shares of stock they obtain through the exercise of stock options or awards of restricted stock until they have met their respective ownership targets, except to cover stock option exercise costs and tax withholding obligations. Most executives who are subject to a stock ownership requirement hold stock well above their respective ownership targets. As of February 14, 2007, the Named Executive Officers (as described on page 33 below) exceeded their respective ownership targets by an average of over 300%, and the President and Chief Executive Officer held stock with a value of approximately 15 times his base salary.
Non-Employee Director Stock Ownership Requirements. Each non-employee Director must own at least 5,000 shares of stock or stock equivalents within 3 years of joining the Board. As described under “Director Compensation” on pages 11-12 above, non-employee Directors cannot receive payment for any Stock Option awards they obtain under the Director Plan until they reach and maintain their ownership target or leave the Board of Directors. In addition, except for a change of control of KB Home, non-employee Directors may not receive payment for any Stock Unit awards they obtain under the Director Plan until they leave the Board.
   Over the years, these stock ownership requirements have contributed to an ownership culture at KB Home with a close alignment of stockholder and management interests focused on creating long-term stockholder value.
   At the same time, however, KB Home’s stock ownership requirements were carefully designed to strike the right balance between management ownership and management compensation. No stock ownership policy should hinder KB Home’s ability to attract, motivate and retain high-quality management talent at a reasonable cost. KB Home’s continued ability to do so is critical to its and its stockholders’ long-term success.
   The proposed stock retention requirement does not strike the right balance. Perversely, while this proposal supposedly seeks to promote equity ownership, it would actually make equity compensation less attractive for both our executives and Directors and for KB Home. The proposal reduces the benefits of equity compensation to our executives and Directors by:
 • Severely limiting our executives’ ability to diversify their personal assets, which are already heavily weighted in KB Home stock.Sets compensation targets for the Plan’s annual and long-term incentive pay components at or below the peer group median;
 
 • Requiring our executives and Directors to spend significantly moreDelivers a majority of their own funds to pay exercise prices and associated taxes

26


incurred on the exercise or vesting ofPlan’s target long-term compensation through performance-vested, not simply time-vested, equity compensation.awards;
 
 • Making it more difficultProvides the strategic rationale and relative weightings of the financial and non-financial performance metrics or criteria used in the annual and performance-vested long-term incentive components of the Plan;
• Establishes performance targets for our executiveseach Plan financial metric relative to make estate planningthe performance of the Company’s peer companies; and charitable giving arrangements.
• Limits payment under the annual and performance-vested long-term incentive components of the Plan to when the Company’s performance on its selected financial performance metrics exceeds peer group median performance.

 This proposal similarly reduces
Proponent’s Supporting Statement
We feel it is imperative that executive compensation plans for senior executives be designed and implemented to promote long-term corporate value. A critical design feature of a well-conceived executive compensation plan is a close correlation between the benefitslevel of equitypay and the level of corporate performance. The pay-for-performance concept has received considerable attention, yet all too often executive pay plans provide generous compensation for average or below average performance. We believe the failure to tie executive compensation to KB Home by:superior corporate performance has fueled the escalation of executive compensation and detracted from the goal of enhancing long-term corporate value. We believe that the Pay for Superior Performance principle presents a straightforward formulation for senior executive incentive compensation that will help establish more rigorous pay for performance features in the Company’s Plan. A strong pay and performance nexus will be established when reasonable incentive compensation target pay levels are established; demanding performance goals related to strategically selected financial performance metrics are set in comparison to peer company performance; and incentive payments are awarded only when median peer performance is exceeded.
We believe the Company’s Plan fails to promote the Pay for Superior Performance principle in several important ways. Our analysis of the Company’s executive compensation plan reveals the following features that do not promote the Pay for Superior Performance principle:
 • Mandating a “one size fits all” approach that prevents us from requiring a range of target ownership levels based on position, seniority, salary level and other relevant factors.The company does not disclose whether it targets total compensation at, above or below market median.
 
 • UnderminingThe company lists performance metrics for the retention valueannual incentive plan but does not disclose any performance target information.


17


• The company does not disclose the percentage breakdown of our equity compensation programs by making it more attractive for executives exercising vestedthe components of its long-term incentive compensation.
• Stock options toare fixed-price only.
• Restricted stock awards do so after leaving KB Home, when they would no longer be subject to the proposed stock retention requirement.not contain any performance features.
• Performance units are based only on internal targets, and those targets are not disclosed.
 This
We believe a plan designed to reward superior corporate performance relative to peer companies will help moderate executive compensation and focus senior executives on building sustainable long-term corporate value. We urge shareholders to vote FOR our proposal.
Recommendation of the Board AGAINST the Proposal
Despite the title the proponent gives its compensation “principle,” it does NOT establish a pay-for-performance plan. Accordingly, your Board believes this proposal does not serve the best interests of KB Home or its stockholders and recommends a vote AGAINST it.
We share the proponent’s view that executive incentive compensation should appropriately reward performance that creates and sustains enterprise and stockholder value, and believe that this view is reflected in our current executive compensation philosophy and programs. These are discussed in detail below under the heading “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”
However, by requiring us to set incentive compensation targets “at or below peer group median,” we believe implementing this proposal would makeseriously undermine incentive pay’s role in promoting value creation. We also believe it more difficult and costlywould severely impair our ability to attract, motivate and retain managementhigh-caliber executive talent. OfIndeed, we cannot conceive how offering to reward someone with just average or below-average pay for delivering above-average results would provide a true incentive for them to come to or stay with us, or motivate them to deliver such results. This is particularly true for exceptional executive talent in a highly competitive market for top-performing individuals.
In this respect, the eleven companies we considerproposal essentially fails to beaccomplish what its proponent asserts is a “critical design feature of a well-conceived executive compensation plan” — “a close correlation between the level of pay and the level of corporate performance.” In our most direct operational peers, only one reports maintaining a share retention requirement, and that retention requirement applies only with respect to net shares obtained from stock option exercises and only until covered executives reach their respective stock ownership targets. The rest report no retention requirement at all. In order to compete with these companies for management talent, KB Home would likely need to pay additionalview, restricting incentive compensation to offseta level below the burdenslevel of performance required to earn it does not establish a “close correlation” between pay and performance. Therefore, we think the executive compensation approach in this proposal would imposeis clearly not “well-conceived,” even from the view of the proponent’s own standards.
We believe that our current executive compensation programs and practices provide primarily performance-based pay consistent with the proponent’s compensation “principle,” while enabling us to remain competitive in attracting, motivating and retaining quality executive talent. For instance, as further discussed in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” on pages 25-35 below, 80-to-90 percent of the abilitytotal compensation paid to our named executive officers is variable and based on their achieving individual and company performance goals. In addition, long-term incentive compensation grants to our named executive officers for the two most recent fiscal years consisted almost entirely of its executivesperformance-vesting awards. This included a restricted stock grant to the CEO that vests only to the extent that our total stockholder return over a three-year period achieves specified thresholds relative to a peer group, and Directorsit may not vest at all if a specified minimum threshold is not achieved. At the same time, we have retained a solid management team that successfully achieved operational, cash flow and other financial objectives in the 2007 fiscal year during an unexpectedly severe downturn in the housing industry.
We also believe that the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” on pages 25-35 below, contains much of the performance-based information the proponent claims is lacking in our disclosures. This includes disclosure of (a) named executive officer total compensation targets, (b) performance target information, (c) the percentage breakdown of long-term incentive compensation components, and (d) the rationale behind the nature and mix of compensation paid to realize value from equity compensation. The Board believes the loss of talent and/or higher compensation costs likely triggered by this proposal would hurt KB Home’s ability to create long-term stockholder value.Accordingly, your Board recommends that you vote AGAINST this proposal.named executive officers.


18


Vote Required
 
Approval of this stockholder proposal requires the affirmative vote of the majority of shares of Common Stockcommon stock present or represented, and entitled to vote thereon, at the Annual Meeting. However, the proposal is a request to the Board of Directors to consider a matter. If the proposal passes, the Board may consider, in its business judgment, whether to take the requested action or not, but it is not legally obligated to do so.

27


Your Board recommends that you vote AGAINST this proposal.
Proposal 6:4:
Stockholder Proposal
 
The AFL-CIO ReserveTrowel Trades S&P 500 Index Fund, 815 Sixteenth1776 Eye Street, N.W., 5th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20006, the beneficial owner of 4002,377 shares of our Common Stock,common stock, has notified us that it intends to present a proposal at the Annual Meeting. The proposal is set forth below, along with the recommendation of ourthe Board of Directors that you vote AGAINST the proposal. We accept no responsibility for the accuracy of the proposal or the proponent’s supporting statement.
Stockholder Proposal
   RESOLVED, that the shareholders of KB Home (the “Company”) urge the Board of Directors to adopt a policy that a significant portion of future equity compensation grants to senior executives shall be shares of stock that require the achievement of performance goals as a prerequisite to vesting (“performance-vesting shares”).
   This policy shall apply to existing employment agreements and equity compensation plans only if the use of performance-vesting shares can be legally implemented by the Company, and will otherwise apply to the design of all future plans and agreements.
Proponent’s Supporting Statement
   We believe that our Company’s compensation policies should encourage the ownership of stock by senior executives in order to align their interests with those of shareholders. To achieve this goal, we favor granting senior executives actual shares of stock that vest only after meeting specified performance goals. In our opinion, performance-vesting shares are a better form of equity compensation than fixed-price stock options or time-vesting restricted stock.
   Fixed-price stock option grants provide senior executives with incentives that may not be in the best interests of long-term shareholders. In our view, stock option grants promise executives all the benefit of share price increases with none of the risk of share price declines. This asymmetrical incentive structure can reward executives for share price volatility, a measure of investment risk. Stock options can also reward short-term decision-making because many executives’ options can be exercised just one year after the grant date. Furthermore, we believe that stock options can create a strong incentive to manipulate a company’s stock price through questionable or even fraudulent accounting.
   Leading investors and regulators have questioned the use of stock options. Berkshire Hathaway CEO Warren Buffet has characterized fixed-price stock options as “really a royalty on the passage of time.” Former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan blamed poorly-structured options for the “infectious greed” of the 1990s because “they failed to properly align the long-term interests of shareholders and managers.” In August our Company announced an informal SEC inquiry into KB Home’s stock option grants.
   Similarly, we oppose granting executives time-vesting restricted stock that does not include any performance requirements. In our view, time-vesting restricted stock rewards tenure, not performance. Instead, we believe vesting requirements should be tailored to measure each individual executive’s performance through disclosed benchmarks, in addition to the Company’s share price. To align their incentives with those of long-term sharehold-

28


ers, we also believe that senior executives should be required to hold a significant portion of these performance-vesting shares for as long as they remain executives of the Company.
   Executive compensation consultant Pearl Meyer has said “if a company is going to issue restricted stock grants as a way of making sure executives are owners rather than optionees, the grant should be earned on a performance basis – it shouldn’t be just a giveaway.” Former SEC Chairman Richard Breeden has stated that “there is not a strong reason for granting restricted stock rather than simply paying cash unless there are performance hurdles to vesting.”
Recommendation of the Board of Directors AGAINST the Proposal
   Your Board of Directors believes this proposal does not serve the best interests of KB Home or its stockholders and recommends a vote AGAINST it.
   Executive compensation at KB Home is overseen by the Board of Directors through the Management Development and Compensation Committee (“Compensation Committee”). The Compensation Committee consists exclusively of independent Directors who, with the assistance of independent compensation consultants and other advisors, make decisions they believe are in the best interests of KB Home and our stockholders. We have long supported the concept of performance-based incentive arrangements for senior executives. In particular, we believe that the incentive programs for our senior executives should be determined within a framework based on the achievement of designated financial and other targets. Furthermore, we believe that executive compensation should be designed to attract, motivate and retain talented executives responsible for our success.
   We believe that we have already implemented a flexible compensation program for senior executives that links compensation to performance. We believe that adopting a policy that requires a significant portion of future equity compensation grants to senior executives to automatically be performance-vesting restricted stock would put us at a competitive disadvantage by severely restricting the Compensation Committee’s discretion to select from among those compensation vehicles that best compensate our senior executives while advancing our long-term success and enhancing stockholder value.
   We also believe that time-vesting stock options are inherently performance-based compensation vehicles, since their eventual value to the recipient is directly linked to the price of our stock, which is largely driven by company performance.
   Performance-vesting awards have become more popular and the Compensation Committee may consider this trend among the various alternatives for long-term equity incentive compensation. However, we believe that it is in the best interests of our stockholders to allow the Compensation Committee the flexibility and discretion to use and introduce all available compensation and equity incentive tools as appropriate, based on the circumstances and information available at the time and after consultation with its independent advisors. This proposal would unduly limit the Compensation Committee’s flexibility and undercut its compensation philosophy by requiring that a significant portion of equity compensation be in one particular form.
   Given these concerns about performance-vesting shares, the Board believes this proposal would not be in the best interests of KB Home or its stockholders.Accordingly, your Board recommends a vote AGAINST this proposal.

29


Vote Required
   Approval of this stockholder proposal requires the affirmative vote of the majority of shares of Common Stock present or represented, and entitled to vote thereon, at the Annual Meeting. However, the proposal is a request to the Board of Directors to consider a matter. If the proposal passes, the Board may consider, in its business judgment, whether to take the requested action or not, but it is not legally obligated to do so.

30


Proposal 7:
Stockholder Proposal
    The Trowel Trades S&P 500 Index Fund, 1776 Eye Street, N.W., 5th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20006, the beneficial owner of 2,377 shares of our Common Stock, has notified us that it intends to present a proposal at the Annual Meeting. The proposal is set forth below, along with the recommendation of our Board of Directors that you vote AGAINST the proposal. We accept no responsibility for the accuracy of the proposal or the proponent’s supporting statement.
Stockholder Proposal
RESOLVED:  that the shareholders of KB Home (the “Company”(“the Company”) urge the Board of Directors to seek shareholder approval of future severance agreements with senior executives that provide benefits in an amount exceeding 2.99 times the sum of the executives’ base salary plus bonus. “Future severance agreements” include employment agreementsEmployment Agreements containing severance provisions, special retirement provisions and agreements renewing, modifying or extending existing such agreements. “Benefits” include lump-sum cash payments (including payments in lieu of medical and other benefits); the payment of any “gross up”“gross-up” tax liability; the estimated present value of special retirement provisions; any stock or option awards that are awarded under any severance agreement; any prior stock or option awards as to which the executive’s access is accelerated under the severance agreement; fringe benefits; and consulting fees (including reimbursable expenses) to be paid byto the executive.
Proponent’s Supporting Statement
 
In our opinion, severance agreements as described in this resolution, commonly known as “golden parachutes”, are excessive in light of the high levels of compensation enjoyed by senior executives at the Company and U.S. corporations in general.
 We believe requiring
The company’s10-Q statement filed on April 9, 2007, showed the level of shareholder approval of such agreements may have the beneficial effect of insulating the Board of Directors from manipulation in the event a senior executive’s employment must be terminated by the Company. Because it is not always practical to obtain prior shareholder approval, the Company would have the option ifsupport for this proposal were implemented— 54,800,388 shares (85%) voted in favor of seeking shareholder approval afterit, 9,235,575 shares (14%) opposed it and 352,797 shares abstained.
The Company’s10-Q statement filed on October 10, 2007, stated that in response to this vote, the material termsCompany’s Compensation Committee “has adopted an overall executive severance policy fornon-change of controlsituations that it believes is consistent with the spirit of the agreement were agreed upon.
   For those reasons, we urge shareholders to vote for this proposal.
Recommendation of the Board of Directors AGAINST the Proposal
   Your Board recommends a vote AGAINST this proposal because it would impair KB Home’s ability to attract and retain high-caliber executive talent, and, as a result, could inhibit KB Home’s ability to create long-term stockholder value.
   The Board, through its Management Development and Compensation Committee, takes seriously its duty to provide independent oversight of KB Home’s compensation practices to ensure that they enhance long-term stockholder value. To achieve this goal, KB Home strives to design compensation programs and packages that will attract, motivate and retain quality executives whose skills and abilities will enable KB Home to outperform its competitors in the homebuilding industry.

31


   Severance agreements are a common and appropriate component of the compensation programs and packages that KB Home offers from time to time to certain executiveswhile still allowing us to remain competitive in the market for executive talent againsttalent.” (Emphasis supplied.) The statement also reveals that: “Furthermore, the vesting ofall equity awardsand other long term incentive awards will continue to be governed by the terms of those awards.” (Emphasis supplied.) The statement does not address whether gross up payments for tax liabilities will be paid, although it expresses “concern” over how our proposal defines benefits.
We respectfully disagree that these measures are consistent with the spirit of our proposal. The exclusion of severance payments in change of control situations is the most obvious departure. The 2007 proxy statement reveals that if our Chief Executive Officer is terminated following a change in control “he will be entitled to receive 300% of his salary plus 300% of his average annual bonus for the prior three years, but in no event more than $12 million.”


19


For these reasons, we urge shareholders to vote in favor of this proposal and send the Board of Directors a message that we want meaningful reform of future severance agreements.
Recommendation of the Board AGAINST the Proposal
Recently, your Board adopted a new severance policy that we believe is substantially consistent with the advisory proposal. This action was taken in response to stockholders’ approval of this advisory proposal at our 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders after careful consideration and a review of executive severance policies at peer homebuilding companies and other similar-sizedsimilarly sized public companies. Severance agreements also serve an important role in motivating executives to focus on maximizing KB Home’s performance and stockholder value when significant strategic transactions are being considered.
 When offered, KB Home tailors
Severance payments under the new policy would be well below the 2.99 times limit in the advisory proposal: two times base salary and average bonus for top executives, and one times base salary and average bonus for certain other senior executives. Importantly, the “average bonus” amount is limited to thelowerof (a) average bonus for the past three fiscal years or (b) three times or two times base salary, depending on seniority. The CEO’s Employment Agreement further limits his severance agreementspayment by capping the overall amount at $6 million. If eligible for his severance payment under his Employment Agreement, the CEO is also entitled to receive a cash payment equal to a specific individual’s unique skills and abilities orpro rata portion of his average bonus for the past three fiscal years, with the pro rata amount based on the number of calendar days he served as an employee in the fiscal year in which an eligible termination occurs divided by 365. However, he is not entitled to this cash payment if our pre-tax income for the four fiscal quarters immediately prior to the responsibilitiesdate his employment terminates, in the aggregate, is negative.
This limited severance willnotbe paid to executives, including the CEO, whose employment we terminate for cause or who leave voluntarily.
This new policy applies to all executive employment terminations other than those following achange-in-control, which remain governed by our existingchange-in-control severance plan.
Severance under thechange-in-control plan is limited to two times base salary and duties associatedaverage bonus for senior executives and one times base salary and average bonus for other executives, multiples well below the 2.99 times limit in the advisory proposal. “Average bonus” under thechange-in-control plan is the average bonus earned for the past three fiscal years.
Thechange-in-control severance plan has a “double-trigger,” ensuring that severance is not paid unless both of the following occur: (a) there is achange-in-control and (b) within 18 months following thatchange-in-control, an executive’s employment is terminated other than for cause or disability or the executive voluntarily leaves for good reason.
The CEO’s Employment Agreement has a more restrictive double trigger forchange-in-control severance. Severance is paid only if, as part of achange-in-control, the CEO’s employment is terminated at the request of the other party or as part of the merger or similar agreement effecting the change in control. If this more restrictive double trigger occurs, the CEO would be eligible to receive a severance payment under this agreement equal to three times his base salary and average annual bonus, with a particular executive position, or both, taking into account competitors’the overall payment capped at $12 million.
These severance offerings. As a result,arrangements would not affect any rights that our executives may have under other benefit plans, including retirement, long-term incentive and stock plans. This is perhaps the main difference between our current severance agreements KB Home offers may provide different levelsarrangements and typesthe type of benefits,policy outlined in the advisory proposal. If an executive’s employment is terminated without cause, and may use a varietyif the executive’s severance payment plus the value of measuresthe executive’s other rights under our benefit plans exceeds the advisory proposal’s 2.99 times cap, the advisory proposal’s policy would require us to calculate benefits,obtain stockholder approval in order to meetpay the demandsexecutive amounts the executive had earned or was otherwise entitled to under these plans, including stock plans already approved by stockholders. This potentially punitive policy would devalue these benefits for all of a particular individualour executives because the benefits they earned through their service to us could be forfeited anytime without any fault on their part. This severe result is much more restrictive than the typical severance arrangements offered by other companies that compete with us for executive talent and would therefore hamper our efforts to recruit and retain top-quality employees. Perversely, the advisory proposal would


20


probably require us to increase executive compensation in order to offset the higher forfeiture risk of the advisory proposal’s policy.
Our severance arrangements are discussed in more detail in this Proxy Statement under the heading “Employment Agreements and Potential Payments upon Termination of Employment or Change in Control” onpages 44-47 below and these arrangements are filed with our periodic reports to the SEC.
We have listened to our stockholders, carefully considered these issues and believe the combination of the new severance policy and the market.existingchange-in-control severance policy represents a thoughtful and responsible approach to severance arrangements.
 This proposal runs counter to the dynamics associated with severance agreements and would make it impractical and costly for KB Home to offer or to implement them. The wide scope of the proposal’s definition of “benefits” and the indeterminate nature of some of those “benefits” – such as potential “gross up” tax liability and estimated present values of “special retirement provisions” – would likely create uncertainty about whether a particular severance agreement would require stockholder approval. As such, KB Home would likely need to call special stockholders meetings for each severance agreement it proposes to offer or has offered to a current or a potential executive to ensure compliance with this proposal.
   This would cause KB Home to incur significant and unnecessary additional expense to reach agreements on compensation with existing or potential future executives. It would also inject delay and uncertainty into the process that would likely distract existing executives and dissuade potential future executives from joining KB Home if they can reach these agreements on compensation with competitors without having to first seek stockholder approval. The alternative, to not offer severance agreements to existing and potential future executives, would make KB Home a less attractive employer for such individuals relative to its peers and other public companies.
   For the reasons discussed above, this proposal would likely place KB Home at a competitive disadvantage in attracting, motivating and retaining talented executives who are critical to KB Home’s and its stockholders’ future success.Accordingly, your Board recommends that you vote AGAINST this proposal.
Vote Required
 
Approval of this stockholder proposal requires the affirmative vote of the majority of shares of Common Stockcommon stock present or represented, and entitled to vote thereon, at the Annual Meeting. However, the proposal is a request to the Board of Directors to consider a matter. If the proposal passes, the Board may consider, in its business judgment, whether to take the requested action or not, but it is not legally obligated to do so.
Your Board recommends that you vote AGAINST this proposal.


21

32


Ownership of KB Home Securities
 
Ownership of Directors and Management
 
The following table lists, as of February 14, 2007, (i)25, 2008, the beneficial ownership of our Common Stockcommon stock by each Director, each Director nomineedirector and each of the executive officers named in the Summary“Summary Compensation Table (the “Named Executive Officers”) individually,Table” on page 35 below, and by all current Directorsdirectors and executive officers as a group; and (ii) the holdings of each of our non-employee Directors of Stock-Based Awards (including Stock Option and Stock Unit awards), as granted to them under the Director Plan, as described on pages 11-12 above. Based on each Director’s election, the non-employee Directors will receive cash payouts for the outstanding Stock-Based Awards granted to them under the Director Plan.
group. Except as stated in footnote (c) below,to the table, beneficial ownership is direct and the person indicatedeach director and executive officer has sole voting and investment power over his or her shares. No current
The non-employee directors’ equity-based holdings under the Director Director nominee or executive officer owns more than 1.0% of our Common Stock, other than Mr. Mezger, who owns approximately 2.0%. Bruce Karatz, who served as our ChairmanPlan are set forth on page 12 above and Chief Executive Officer through November 12, 2006, may beneficially own as much as 5.1% of our Common Stock. However, the nature and extent of his rights to certain outstanding stock options and shares of restricted Common Stock granted to him during his tenure is subject to both a court order preventing Mr. Karatz from exercising his stock options and a Tolling Agreement between us and Mr. Karatz, and hasare not been determined, as further describedreflected in the footnotestable below. As a group, all of our Directors, Director nominees and current executive officers own in the aggregate approximately 3.0% of our Common Stock.
         
  Amount and Nature of Holdings of Stock-Based
Non-Employee Directors Beneficial Ownership (a – c) Awards under Director Plan (d)
 
Ronald W. Burkle  1,000   174,935 
Timothy W. Finchem     7,129 
Dr. Ray R. Irani  10,000   96,801 
Kenneth M. Jastrow, II     31,191 
James A. Johnson     192,501 
J. Terrence Lanni     19,379 
Melissa Lora  2,027   17,415 
Michael G. McCaffery     55,270 
Leslie Moonves     17,415 
Luis G. Nogales  7,400   52,513 

33


       
  Amount and Nature of Holdings of Stock-Based
Named Executive Officers Beneficial Ownership (a – c) Awards under Director Plan (d)
 
Jeffrey T. Mezger  1,821,465  N/A
Domenico Cecere  259,883  N/A
Robert Freed  145,503  N/A
William R. Hollinger  250,262  N/A
Kelly Masuda  42,029  N/A
Bruce Karatz  4,528,183  N/A
All Directors, Director nominees and current executive officers as a group (16 people)  
2,591,743
  
664,549
 
             
   Amount and Nature
     
   of Beneficial
  Percent
  
  Non-Employee Directors  Ownership (a - c)  of Class  
Mr. Bollenbach       *   
             
Mr. Burkle   1,000    *   
             
Mr. Finchem       *   
             
Mr. Jastrow       *   
             
Mr. Johnson       *   
             
Mr. Lanni       *   
             
Ms. Lora   2,043    *   
             
Mr. McCaffery       *   
             
Mr. Moonves       *   
             
Mr. Nogales   7,400    *   
 
             
Named Executive Officers
            
 
Jeffrey T. Mezger   1,942,053    2.1%  
             
Domenico Cecere   186,789    *   
             
William R. Hollinger   259,404    *   
             
Glen W. Barnard   58,170    *   
             
Kelly K. Masuda   50,005    *   
             
             
All directors and executive officers as a group (17 people)
   2,517,364    2.8%  
             
(a)Included are shares of Common Stockcommon stock subject to acquisition within 60 days of February 14, 200725, 2008 through the exercise of stock options granted under our employee benefitequity compensation plans in the following amounts: Mr. Mezger 1,428,940;1,520,606; Mr. Cecere 240,134; Mr. Freed 55,066;168,800; Mr. Hollinger 164,058;174,058; Mr. Barnard 52,667; Mr. Masuda 35,001;43,334; and all current executive officers as a group 1,967,867. As of February 14, 2007, the Company and Mr. Karatz have not agreed on the nature and extent of Mr. Karatz’s rights in the outstanding stock options granted to him. Immediately prior to Mr. Karatz’s departure as our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, 2,658,120 shares of our Common Stock were subject to acquisition within 60 days through the exercise of stock options granted to him.2,039,465.
 
(b)Included are awards of shares of restricted Common Stockcommon stock in the following amounts: Mr. Mezger 175,493;159,343; Mr. Cecere 12,665; Mr. Freed 43,904;7,741; Mr. Hollinger 4,900;2,500; Mr. Barnard 2,000; Mr. Masuda 3,000;2,000; and all current executive officers as a group 246,962. As of February 14, 2007, the Company and Mr. Karatz have not agreed on the nature and extent of Mr. Karatz’s rights in the shares of restricted Common Stock granted to him. Immediately prior to Mr. Karatz’s departure as our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, he held 1,613,282 shares of restricted Common Stock.173,584.
 
(c)Included are beneficially owned shares of Common Stock held in certain trusts as follows: Immediately prior to Mr. Karatz’s departure as our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, he held the Common Stock he beneficially owned in a trust of which he was the sole trustee and sole beneficiary and over which he exercised sole voting and investment power; and Ms. Lora holds 2,0272,043 shares of our Common Stockcommon stock in a trust in which she and her spouse are trustees and sole beneficiaries and over which they jointly exercise voting and investment power.
 
(d)Included are Stock Option awards and Stock Unit awards granted under the Director Plan in the following amounts: Mr. Burkle 141,615, 33,320; Mr. Finchem 0, 7,129; Dr. Irani 37,628, 59,173; Mr. Jastrow 0, 31,191; Mr. Johnson 143,957, 48,544; Mr. Lanni 0, 19,379; Ms. Lora 0, 17,415; Mr. McCaffery 46,069, 9,201; Mr. Moonves 0, 17,415; and Mr. Nogales 2,130, 50,383. Our executive officers are not eligible to receive Stock-Based Awards under our Director Plan.Denotes less than one percent ownership.


22

34


Beneficial Owners of More Than Five Percent of ourOur Common Stock
 Except as stated above or in the footnotes, the
The information below shows each person or entity known to us as of February 14, 200725, 2008 to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent of our Common Stock:common stock:
         
  Amount and Nature Percent
  of Beneficial of
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner Ownership Class
     
KB Home Grantor Stock Ownership Trust,
Wachovia Bank, N.A., as Trustee,
Institutional Trust and Retirement Services
101 North Main Street
Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27150
  12,337,882(a)  13.8% 
 
Marsico Capital Management, LLC
1200 17th Street, Suite 1600
Denver, Colorado 80202
  8,250,187(b)  9.2% 
 
FMR Corp. and Edward C. Johnson 3d
82 Devonshire Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02109
  6,967,654(c)  7.8% 
 
Jeffrey L. Gendell
55 Railroad Avenue
Greenwich, Connecticut 06830
  6,036,188(d)  6.8% 
 
             
   Amount and Nature
     
   of Beneficial
  Percent
  
  Name and Address of Beneficial Owner  Ownership  of Class  
KB Home Grantor Stock Ownership Trust (a)   12,148,482    13.6%  
Wachovia Executive Benefits Group
One West Fourth Street - NC 6251
Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27101
            
             
             
FMR LLC and Edward C. Johnson 3d (b)   11,589,788    12.9%  
82 Devonshire Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02109
            
             
             
AXA Financial, Inc., et al. (c)   10,006,055    11.2%  
1290 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10104
            
 
(a)The KB Home Grantor Stock Ownership Trust Wachovia Bank, N.A., as Trustee (the “GSOT”(“GSOT”) holds all of the shares of our common stock reported above pursuant to a trust agreement with Wachovia Bank, N.A., as trustee, in connection with the prefunding of certain of our obligations to employees under our employee benefit plans. Both the GSOT and the Trusteetrustee disclaim beneficial ownership of the shares reported. The Trusteetrustee has no discretion over the manner in which the shares of our common stock held byin the GSOT are voted. The trust agreement for the GSOT provides that, as of any given record date, employees who hold unexercised options under our employee equity compensation plans will determine the manner in which shares of our Common Stockcommon stock held in the GSOT are voted.
The Trusteetrustee will vote the shares of our Common Stockcommon stock held in the GSOT in the manner directed by those eligible employees who submit voting instructions for the shares. The number of shares of our common stock as to which any one employee can direct the vote will depend upon how many employees submit voting instructions to the Trustee.trustee. Employees who are also Directorsdirectors are excluded from voting; accordingly, Mr. Mezger may not direct the vote of any shares in the GSOT. If all eligible employees submit voting instructions to the Trustee,trustee, the other Named Executive Officersnamed executive officers who are employed by the Companyus at the date of the Annual Meeting will have the right to direct the vote of the following share amounts of the shares of our common stock held in the GSOT (which, for each eligible Named Executive Officer,named executive officer, include both the stock options reported above in the “Beneficial Ownership of Directors and Management” table and stock options granted to them under our employee benefit plans that do not vest within 60 days of February 14, 2007)25, 2008): Mr. Cecere 1,288,711;

35


Mr. Freed 353,171;1,114,047, Mr. Hollinger 904,656;1,148,343, Mr. Barnard 352,216, Mr. Masuda 231,227;293,514, and all current executive officers as a group (excluding Mr. Mezger) 3,055,244.2,908,119. The trust agreement furtherfor the GSOT provides that all voting instructionsfor the GSOT received by the Trusteetrustee will be held in confidence and will not be disclosed to any person, including to us.

(b)The stock holding information reported in the table above and in this footnote is based solely on an amendment to Schedule 13G dated February 13, 2007 that Marsico Capital Management, LLC, an investment advisor, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission to report beneficial ownership as of December 31, 2006. Of the amount reported as beneficially owned, Marsico Capital Management, LLC exercises sole voting power as to 6,913,306 shares and sole dispositive power as to 8,250,187 shares. Marsico Capital Management, LLC does not share voting power as to any of the shares reported.
(c)The stock holding information reported in the table above and in this footnote is based solely on an amendment to Schedule 13G dated February 14, 20072008 that FMR Corp.LLC filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission to report beneficial ownership of FMR LLC (f/k/a FMR Corp.) and Mr. Edward C. Johnson 3d, FMR Corp.’sLLC’s Chairman, as of December 31, 2006.2007. The shares are beneficially owned by the following direct or indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries of FMR Corp.:LLC: (i) Fidelity Management & Research Company (6,551,769(11,530,567 shares), and (ii) Fidelity Management Trust Company (13,000 shares), (iii) Pyramis Global Advisors LLC (16,700 shares), (iv) Pyramis Global Advisors Trust Company (116,785(53,921 shares); and by Fidelity International Limited (269,400(5,300 shares), an entity of which Edward C. Johnson 3d is Chairman and in which his family owns an indirect interest. FMR Corp.LLC and Mr. Edward C. Johnson 3d have sole dispositive power as to all of the shares reported, and FMR Corp.LLC has sole voting power as to 378,55459,221 shares.


23


(d)(c) The stock holding information reported in the table above and in this footnote is based solely on an amendment to Schedule 13G dated February 13, 200714, 2008 that Mr. Gendell, individually, and as managing member of Tontine Management, L.L.C.AXA Financial, Inc., general partner of Tontine Partners, L.P., and Tontine Overseas Associates, L.L.C.,et al. filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to a joint filing agreement to report beneficial ownership as of December 31, 2006. Mr. Gendell, in his capacity as managing member, directs2007. The shares are beneficially owned by the operations of each of Tontine Management, L.L.C.following AXA Financial, Inc. subsidiaries: AllianceBernstein L.P., an investment advisor, and Tontine Overseas Associates, L.L.C. Tontine Management, L.L.C., as general partner, has the power to direct the affairs of Tontine Partners, L.P.AXA Equitable Life Insurance Company, an insurance company and an investment advisor. Of the amount reported as beneficially owned, Mr. Gendell exercises(i) AllianceBernstein L.P. had sole voting and dispositive power with respectas to 350,0006,468,637 shares andof our common stock, had shared voting power as to 976,179 shares, voting andhad sole dispositive power as to 5,686,188 shares. Of those 5,686,18810,003,800 shares (i) Tontine Management, L.L.C. shares voting and had shared dispositive power as to 3,402,409 shares, which shares are directly owned by Tontine Partners, L.P.,16 shares; and (ii) Tontine Overseas Associates, L.L.C.AXA Equitable Life Insurance Company had sole voting power as to 2,200 shares votingof our common stock and had sole dispositive power as to 2,283,7792,239 shares. AXA is a parent holding company for AXA Financial, Inc. AXA Assurances I.A.R.D. Mutuelle, AXA Assurances Vie Mutuelle and AXA Courtage Assurances Mutuelle, as a group (collectively, “Mutuelles AXA”), are the parent holding company that controls AXA. The address of Mutuelles AXA is 26, rue Drouot, 75009 Paris, France. The address of AXA is 25, avenue Matignon, 75008 Paris, France.
Stock Ownership Requirements
We have established stock ownership requirements for our non-employee directors and senior management to better align their interests with those of our stockholders. Our Corporate Governance Principles require each of our non-employee directors to own at least 5,000 shares of our common stock or common stock equivalents within three years of joining the Board. Our Executive Stock Ownership Policy applies to members of our senior management team and requires executives at various levels to own a number of shares whose value is equivalent to a range ofone-to-five times base salary. Executives are expected to demonstrate meaningful progress toward satisfying their applicable requirement and to comply fully within five years of becoming subject to the policy, or be subject to consequences for non-compliance. The policy, as it pertains to our named executive officers, is discussed in additional detail under the heading “Equity Stock Ownership Policy” on page 34 below.


24

36


Executive Compensation
Management Development and Compensation Committee Report
Committee Report on Executive Compensation
Executive Compensation Philosophy and Principles
The Management Development and Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors overseeshas reviewed and discussed the Company’sfollowing “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” with KB Home management. Based on this review and discussion, the Management Development and Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” be included in this Proxy Statement.
Management Development and Compensation Committee
J. Terrence Lanni, Chairman
Timothy W. Finchem
Michael G. McCaffery
Luis G. Nogales
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Overview
We believe our KBnxt operational business model provides us with a distinct competitive advantage over other homebuilders. This disciplined, fact-based and process-driven approach to homebuilding, founded on a constant and systematic assessment of consumer preferences and market opportunities, is designed to generate operational efficiencies and return on investment for our business.
We also believe that our success depends on our having a talented and dedicated workforce. Therefore, our compensation and benefit programs aim to attract, motivate and retain the best people and to maximize, through an appropriate investment of resources, their contributions in creating enterprise and stockholder value. To accomplish these goals, we design our compensation and benefit arrangements to appropriately reward the contributions our people make, taking into account the following: their specific roles, responsibilities, experience and skill sets; individual performance; the market rate for comparable jobs; the existing business environment; and our overall financial and operational results. We believe our linking the compensation and benefits we provide to contributions that enhance enterprise and stockholder value establishes a clear alignment between the interests of our employees and our stockholders. We also promote an alignment of employee and stockholder interests by paying a greater proportion of variable (i.e., performance-based) cash and equity-based compensation to our employees as their specific duties and responsibilities increase.
The above goals and considerations provide the basis for our executive compensation programs.philosophy and the specific compensation and benefit arrangements we have with our named executive officers (“NEOs”). Short- and long-term NEO compensation is based primarily on each NEO’s individual performance in achieving meaningful financialand/or operational objectives and metrics that create and sustain enterprise and stockholder value. NEO compensation and benefits are also based on our overall financial results and on our judgment of what we believe is necessary to attract, motivate and retain high caliber individuals in a highly competitive market for senior executive talent. In keeping with our focus of aligning our compensation arrangements with stockholder interests, a significant proportion of NEO compensation is variable and equity-based in nature.
Executive Compensation Oversight.  The Company designs itsCompensation Committee, with support from our management and outside advisors, oversees our executive compensation and benefit programs, around five key principles, which together constituteincluding the Company’sspecific compensation and benefit arrangements we have with our NEOs. The Compensation Committee evaluates and, as necessary, adjusts these compensation and benefit arrangements to ensure consistency with our compensation and benefit programs’ goals.


25


Compensation Committee Role.  In addition to providing general oversight, the Compensation Committee annually reviews and approves goals and objectives for our CEO, evaluates our CEO’s performance in light of those goals and objectives, and determines and approves our CEO’s compensation based on that performance evaluation, as discussed under the heading “Overview of Executive Officer and Non-Employee Director Compensation Processes and Procedures” on page 7 above. The Compensation Committee also reviews and approves the compensation of the other NEOs.
Compensation Committee Consultant Role.  Semler Brossy Consulting Group LLC serves as the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant, providing advice and perspective to the Compensation Committee on executive and non-employee director compensation and benefits. Under the Compensation Committee’s charter, and to maintain its independence and avoid any conflict of interests, Semler Brossy may not work for our management unless the Compensation Committee pre-approves any such work, including fees.
CEO and Management’s Role.  The Compensation Committee frequently asks for input and support from our management, including our CEO, our Senior Vice President, Human Resources and our Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary and their respective staffs, particularly regarding compensation and benefit plan design and implementation, feedback from employees, and compliance and disclosure requirements. At the request of the Compensation Committee, the CEO reviews and discusses the compensation of the other NEOs and makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee as to annual base salary and short- and long-term incentive compensation awards. Our management is responsible for implementing our compensation and benefit programs under the Compensation Committee’s oversight. Our management has recently retained a compensation consultant, Towers Perrin, for the purpose of providing compensation and benefits related information, analysis and support.
The following discussion provides additional information and analysis regarding our executive compensation philosophy:and benefits program and the specific compensation and benefit arrangements we have with our NEOs.
NEO Compensation Elements Overview
Compensation Element
Purpose / Description
Base SalaryProvide competitive fixed income for performance ofday-to-day position responsibilities. Consists of semi-monthly cash payments.
Short-Term IncentivesBuild accountability and reward achievement of annual goals that support short-term business objectives. Consists primarily of cash payments made after the relevant fiscal year.
Long-Term IncentivesPromote retention and provide link between executive compensation and stockholder value creation over a multi-year period. Consists primarily of the following equity-based awards, which are either cash-or stock-settled:
 • Stock Options/Stock Appreciation
    Rights (“SARs”)
Provide compensation tied to the price of our common stock and paid in stock or cash. The awards have no value if our common stock price falls below the grant price.
 • Restricted Stock/Phantom SharesProvide equity-based compensation tied to the performance of our common stock price to promote retention and to mitigate cyclical industry/market volatility associated with stock options/SARs.
Executive BenefitsThe following provide competitive health and welfare support to enhance recruitment and promote retention:
 • Executive Life InsuranceProvide a death benefit to an executive’s designated beneficiary through company-owned and/or company-paid term life insurance.


26


 • Retirement Plan (closed)Contribute to financial security upon retirement through an annuity benefit. Not all of our NEOs participate in this plan and no new participants have been added to the plan since 2004.
 • Deferred Compensation PlanPermits deferred receipt of earned compensation into a non-qualified savings plan similar to our 401(k) Savings Plan. Amounts deferred under this plan and the 401(k) Savings Plan are eligible for a dollar-for-dollar company matching contribution up to an aggregate amount of six percent of base salary.
 • Executive Health BenefitsProvide 100% reimbursement ofout-of-pocket medical, dental and vision expenses.
Discontinued PerquisitesPerquisites previously made available to all NEOs included automobile allowances, company-paid automobile fuel cards, and reimbursement of expenses for automobile insurance, annual financial planning and tax preparation services, and one-time estate planning services. These perquisites were discontinued in mid-2007.
Mix of Compensation Elements.  For our NEOs, we maintain a mix of market-competitive fixed compensation and benefits coupled with variable incentive pay that depends on individual and company performance. As a result, the compensation paid to each NEO can vary from the compensation paid to other NEOs in a given year and from the compensation paid to the same NEO in other years depending on individual performance evaluations and our results of operations. Individual performance evaluations are conducted as part of an annual merit and salary review process that the Compensation Committee oversees.
The Compensation Committee uses it own judgment when establishing the mix of compensation elements it approves for our NEOs in any given year, taking into account individual and company performance and market survey data, rather than following a set formula or a specific percentage allocation to each element. Consistent with our focus on aligning our compensation arrangements with stockholder interests, the Compensation Committee has generally weighted NEO and other senior executive compensation significantly toward variable, performance-based short-term and long-term vehicles.
Reflecting the Compensation Committee’s approach, over the past several years, approximately 90% of the CEO’s and 80% of other senior executives’ compensation has been variable and based on individual and company performance. In our 2007 fiscal year, approximately 95% of the CEO’s and 85% of other senior executives’ compensation was variable and based on performance because we granted a greater-than-usual number of long-term incentive grants, as further discussed under the heading “CEO and Other NEO Compensation Decisions” onpages 29-33 below.
Short-term variable compensation consists of cash incentives and is used to reward performance in attaining current-year objectives. Long-term variable compensation consists of equity-based awards and is used to reward performance in achieving multi-year strategic objectives and to motivate and retain executives. To reflect the CEO’s key role in setting and executing long-term business strategies, the Compensation Committee has generally awarded the CEO a higher proportion of long-term incentives when compared to the other NEOs.
Our management has prepared tally sheets for the Compensation Committee that set forth the mix of existing NEO compensation components. The Compensation Committee used the tally sheets in making decisions with respect to the compensation components.
Key Considerations in 2007
In 2007, we faced challenging market conditions of unusual severity. Several factors weighed on the entire housing industry, including a persistent oversupply of new and resale homes available for sale that reached historically high levels, increased foreclosure activity, heightened competition for home sales, reduced home affordability, turmoil in


27


the mortgage and credit markets, and decreased consumer confidence in purchasing homes. These are discussed in greater detail in our Annual Report onForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2007.
The Compensation Committee established annual incentive compensation objectives for our NEOs and other senior executives shortly after the beginning of our 2007 fiscal year that were generally designed to further the following business and financial objectives in alignment with the strategic priorities we had set for the year: (a) enhance our balance sheet; (b) improve our gross and pre-tax margins; (c) adjust our strategies to align with the market environment; (d) optimize our land pipeline and reduce our inventory; and (e) execute our KBnxt operational business model.
Given the difficult business environment, our strategic priorities for 2007 were to solidify our financial position and to reposition our business consistent with the disciplines of our KBnxt operational business model. Based on these priorities, we focused on generating cash flow during the year by converting our backlog of sold homes into revenue and strategically converting operating assets into cash, which enabled us to reduce our debt levels. We also reviewed our market positions, community counts and overhead requirements during the year and curtailed our investments where it made financial or strategic sense to do so, including consolidating or exiting underperforming markets. In positioning our business for the future, we intensified our focus on our core customer base by introducing newly designed, smaller, more affordable homes in our active communities at price points calibrated to median income levels to attract these homebuyers, while continuing to invest in our KB Home Studios to provide our homebuyers with a customized approach that we believe uniquely differentiates us from other homebuilders. We also took steps to reengineer our home designs and restructure our supplier and subcontractor relationships to lower production costs and cycle times.
These strategic initiatives and the sale of our French operations near the recent market peak in that country yielded tangible results in our 2007 fiscal year, including:
 • closely link executive compensation to the creationgenerating $1.2 billion of stockholder value;cash from operating activities;
 
 • promote stock ownershipreducing debt levels by executives$759 million at November 30, 2007 compared to directly align their interests with stockholder interests;the prior year;
 
 • reward contributions that enhance the Company’s business by linking individual performance goals and compensation measuresimproving our debt-to-capital ratio, net of cash, to the achievement of specific business objectives;
• balance compensation elements to encourage the achievement of both short-term business plans and long-term strategic objectives;31% at November 30, 2007 from 43% at November 30, 2006; and
 
 • attract, retain and motivate individuals of the highest quality.increasing our cash balance by $625 million to $1.3 billion at November 30, 2007.
 
The Company and the Committee continually analyze the Company’s executive compensation programsspecific accomplishments of our NEOs with respect to ensure they adhere to the above philosophy andthese objectives are competitive with peer companies.discussed further onpages 29-30 below.
CompensationUse of Executive Officers in 2006Market Data
 In
The Compensation Committee considers survey and peer group data as one factor in setting NEO compensation. This information gives the 2006 fiscal year, each executive officerCompensation Committee a general sense of the Company received an annual base salarywhether our NEO compensation is reasonable and annual and long-term incentive compensation, as further described below. Most ofcompetitive relative to the compensation paid to executives with similar responsibilities at companies that we consider to be similar to us based on revenues or nature of operations. Although comparisons to compensation levels at other companies are helpful in assessing the executive officers was in the formoverall competitiveness of incentiveour compensation linked to the achievement of specific short-term and long-term performance objectives by each executive officer, the Company and/or a relevant operational area. Please see the tables under “Executive Compensation” on pages 46-49 below for a detailed presentation of the compensation earned by the Named Executive Officers in the 2006 fiscal year.
Annual Base Salaries. Annual base salaries are compensation for an executive officer’s ongoing contribution to the performance of the operational area(s) for which he or she is responsible. In keeping with the Company’s compensation philosophyprogram to attract and retain individualsexecutive talent, the Compensation Committee does not target compensation at any specified level within a general industry or peer group. Other factors the Compensation Committee considers in making NEO compensation decisions include responsibilities unique to our business operations, individual performance and the requirements of our KBnxt operational business model.
In 2007, the highest quality,Compensation Committee considered aggregated survey data for general industry executive officer base salaries are targetedcompensation published by Towers Perrin, Mercer LLC and Watson Wyatt Data Services for companies with annual revenues ranging from $2 billion to $10 billion. The Compensation Committee considered this survey data because it believes we compete against companies both within and outside our own industry to fill many of our top management positions.


28


The Compensation Committee also considered data from the public companies listed below, which we consider to be competitiveour peer group. Our peer group consists of companies that are engaged, as we are, in high production home building. Our annual revenues approximate the group median.
• Beazer Homes• Lennar Corporation• Ryland Group
• Centex Corporation• MDC Holdings• Standard Pacific
• DR Horton• NVR Incorporated• Toll Brothers
• Hovnanian Enterprises• Pulte Homes
CEO and Other NEO Compensation Decisions
The terms of our CEO’s compensation are governed by his Employment Agreement dated February 28, 2007 (“Employment Agreement”). The Compensation Committee and the Board approved the Employment Agreement following Mr. Mezger’s promotion from Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer in November 2006. The Employment Agreement was designed to motivate and retain our CEO, who provided critically-needed leadership, strategic direction, and stability by agreeing to assume the role following the abrupt departure of key senior executives and during a period of turbulent business conditions. The Board believes the Employment Agreement provides compensation that is in line with averageCEO compensation practices in the homebuilding industry.
In determining the level of base salary and the short- and long-term incentives provided to our NEOs in 2007, the Compensation Committee balanced our financial and operational results given the existing business environment with individual performance and the need to motivate and retain our executive talent pool.
Base Salaries.  Base salary is a fixed element of compensation for our CEO and our other NEOs. The Compensation Committee annually reviews and may approve base salary adjustments based on projected market trends and our performance. Base salaries were also adjusted in 2007 for promotions when they occurred.
Our CEO’s Employment Agreement sets his annual base salary at no less than $1,000,000. The Board believes this is appropriate given Mr. Mezger’s lifelong experience in the homebuilding industry and fourteen years with us, including his seven-year tenure as our Chief Operating Officer preceding his promotion to CEO. It also is consistent with the median of CEO base salaries paid by our peer group.
Base salaries for the other NEOs reflect a number of factors, including each NEO’s experience and specific role in our business, individual performance evaluations and expectations, our current and expected financial results, equity of salary relative to executive officerssimilar executives who are not NEOs, an assessment of market rates with comparablerespect to each NEO’s responsibilities at peer companies. The Committee reviews analyses by the Company’s Human Resources Department and by outside consultants to ensure that base salaries remain competitive.
   In addition to adjustments made for competitive reasons, the Committee adjusts executive officer base salaries based on its assessment of each executive’s performancecompetitiveness, and the Company’s overallour general budgetary guidelines for base salary increases. Inincreases as set by the 2006 fiscal year, individualCompensation Committee. For 2007, the Compensation Committee set annual base salary merit increases for our NEOs other than the CEO of between three and four percent. The Compensation Committee believes these increases represent an appropriate balance between our recent operational results, expected future business conditions and the need to maintain competitive levels of pay to promote retention. Additional one-time base salary increases averaged 3.5% Company-wide. The base salarieswere provided to Messrs. Cecere and Hollinger in January 2007 in consideration of their respective promotions.
Annual Incentives and Discretionary Bonuses.  In 2007, Mr. Mezger was eligible for eacha performance-based annual incentive award based on a specified percentage of our pre-tax, pre-incentive profit, subject to the discretion of the Named Executive Officers were increased consistent withCompensation Committee to reduce the foregoing. Someaward to an amount ranging from $0 to $17.5 million based on its subjective assessment of Mr. Mezger’s performance. Since pre-tax, pre-incentive profit was not achieved, Mr. Mezger did not qualify for this performance-based award.
In 2007, Mr. Mezger substantially exceeded objectives that the Named Executive Officers received additional base salary increases in connection with promotions orCompensation Committee established for his first year as our CEO: strengthen our balance sheet, improve our customer satisfaction scores, streamline our overhead structure and rebuild our senior executive team. In these areas, under Mr. Mezger’s leadership we: (a) generated $1.2 billion of cash from our operations, reducedyear-over-year debt levels by $759 million (26%) and improved ouryear-over-year ratio of debt to maintain competitiveness with base salaries paidtotal capital, net of cash, to 31% from 43%; (b) significantly improved our customer satisfaction levels, as measured by the Company’s peer homebuilders.J.D. Power and Associates, an independent global


29

37


Annual Incentive Awards. Annual
marketing information services firm; (c) achievedyear-over-year reductions in overhead expenses (26%) and headcount (39%) and restructured our operations to align with homebuilding market conditions; and (d) streamlined and rebuilt our executive leadership team by realigning our senior operations management under the leadership of three regional executives and hiring the Senior Vice President, Human Resources and the Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary.
Based on these accomplishments and his key role and significant work in developing, leading and consummating the sale of our French operations at a price near the market peak in that country, which generated total gross cash proceeds of $807 million, the Compensation Committee approved a discretionary annual bonus for Mr. Mezger of $6 million.
In 2007, each of our other NEOs was eligible for an annual incentive awards are intendedbased on his individual performance in achieving specified objectives set by the Compensation Committee, up to reward executive officersthe following maximum amounts: Mr. Cecere $1,800,000, Mr. Hollinger $875,000, Mr. Barnard $1,250,000 and Mr. Masuda $743,750. However, the Compensation Committee decided, in its discretion, to significantly reduce the actual annual incentive payments to each of these NEOs in light of our 2007 financial results, as discussed below.
Messrs. Cecere, Hollinger and Masuda achieved their specified performance objectives of: (a) increasing cash flow by at least $750 million from the sale of our French operations; (b) lowering incurred interest expense, net of interest income, by $35 million while maintaining adebt-to-capital ratio, net of cash, of45-50% at fiscal year end; (c) generating more than $400 million in free cash flow; and (d) reducing selling, general and administrative expenses to ensure that they did not exceed 13.7% as a percent of housing revenues. Based on their individual performance in achieving these accomplishments, the Compensation Committee approved the following annual incentive payments to these NEOs: Mr. Cecere $400,000, Mr. Hollinger $450,000, and Mr. Masuda $350,000.
Mr. Barnard achieved his specified performance objectives of: (a) ensuring 75% of our operating divisions met or exceeded their direct cost reduction goals, resulting in a reduction of more than $50 million of direct costs; (b) developing, expanding and implementing a direct-buy model for building materials, capturing cost reductions; (c) establishing formal, documented and approved market strategies for each operating division; (d) improving the execution of our KBnxt operational business model metrics by 25% from their December 1, 2006 levels; (e) reducing architecture expense by $1 million; and (f) ensuring that 100% of any floor plans and specification levels were consistent with KBnxt operational business model objectives. Based on his individual performance in achieving these accomplishments, the Compensation Committee approved an annual incentive payment to Mr. Barnard of $600,000.
In April 2007, the Compensation Committee awarded one-time bonuses of $350,000 to Mr. Hollinger and $100,000 to Mr. Masuda to recognize the additional responsibilities and duties that each assumed in connection with the Review and our leadership transition at the end of 2006.
Because Mr. Freed’s employment with us ended in July 2007, he did not receive any annual incentive-based compensation for 2007. Upon his termination of employment, Mr. Freed became entitled to an aggregate payment of $2,702,484 representing incentive compensation he earned in prior years. To comply with Internal Revenue Code Section 409A, this payment was made on February 1, 2008.
For our 2008 fiscal year, the Compensation Committee has determined that the payment of annual incentive compensation to our NEOs — excluding Mr. Cecere, who has announced his retirement — will be subject to the achievement of personalan objective performance goal based on the level of our pre-tax income or loss for the year. For each NEO, the Compensation Committee can, in its discretion, reduce or eliminate the actual annual incentive compensation that the NEO may earn based on its subjective assessment of the NEO’s performance against stated objectives for the year. The Compensation Committee believes this approach appropriately balances current market conditions with the need to retain and motivate our NEOs to achieve sound financial and operational results, while preserving the potential tax deductibility of NEO compensation for our 2008 fiscal year.
Long-Term Incentives.  We provide long-term incentive awards to our NEOs to attract and retain high-quality executives and to motivate them to achieve financial and operational performance goals measured over a multi-year


30


period. These awards consist primarily of grants of equity-based vehicles that are settled in cash or stock and are designed to align NEO and stockholder interests. In 2007, the Compensation Committee, with input from Semler Brossy and our management, established ranges of long-term incentive award values by management level. In establishing these ranges, the Compensation Committee considered the value of other compensation elements, market practices, outstanding grants and potential future realizable values of all long-term incentives. The Compensation Committee determined individual NEO award values within these ranges by considering the NEOs’ current and expected future performance, goalsinternal equity by management level and the overall cost of the grants. Individual award values determined the size of the actual grants made to our NEOs based on the closing price of our common stock on the date the awards were granted. These long-term incentive grants are described under the headings “Grant Delayed from 2006” and “October 2007 Grant” below. Our CEO also received long-term incentive awards in 2007 that were established under the terms of his Employment Agreement, as described under the headings “CEO Promotion Grant” and “CEO Employment Agreement Grants” below.
Use of SARS and Phantom Shares.  Except for specific grants to their respective operational areas and/our CEO described below, all long-term incentive grants made in 2007 consisted of SARs and phantom shares that are settled in cash only. The Compensation Committee employed these cash-settled vehicles because we have a limited number of shares currently available for grant under our existing stockholder-approved equity compensation plans. The SARs and phantom shares are designed to mirror the attributes of stock options and restricted stock respectively, except that both instruments are settled in cash. Each SAR, if it vests, will provide a cash payment equal to the positive difference, if any, between its grant price and the closing price of our common stock on the exercise date, and will expire on the tenth anniversary of its grant date. Each phantom share, if it vests, will provide a cash payment equal to the closing price of our common stock on the applicable vesting date, plus the cumulative value of all cash dividends or other distributions paid in respect of a share of our common stock from and including its grant date through and including the Company’s overall business results. Applicablevesting date.
CEO Promotion Grant.  In conjunction with the approval of his Employment Agreement, the Compensation Committee approved a promotional stock option award to our CEO. Due to a blackout necessitated by the Review, however, this award was actually granted in July 2007. The promotional stock option award was in the amount of 325,050 shares.
CEO Employment Agreement Grants.  At the same time as it granted the promotional stock option award, the Compensation Committee granted to our CEO a long-term incentive stock option award pursuant to the terms of his Employment Agreement. This award was in the amount of 325,050 shares. The Compensation Committee also granted to our CEO under his Employment Agreement a long-term incentive award of 54,000 performance criteriashares. The performance shares vest based on our total stockholder return (“TSR”) over a three-year period ending November 30, 2009, relative to our peer group (as described on page 29 above) as follows:
Payout as a Percentage of
Relative TSR Percentile RankingPerformance Shares Granted
<25th percentile
0%
25-50th percentile
25%
50-75th percentile
100%
>75th percentile
150%
The amount of any cash dividends paid on our common stock during the three-year performance period is equally and contemporaneously paid to our CEO on the 54,000 performance shares. Stock dividends or other non-cash dividends issued on or in respect of our common stock will be equally and contemporaneously issued on or in respect of the performance shares, but will be held in escrow and subject to the restrictions and forfeiture conditions imposed on the performance shares.
Grant Delayed from 2006.   Historically, our annual long-term incentive awards have been made in October for the subsequent fiscal year. Due to a blackout necessitated by the Review, the awards that would have been made in October 2006 were delayed until July 2007. At that time, the Compensation Committee granted to our NEOs other than the CEO a combination of SARs and phantom shares, the amounts of which are included in the “Grants


31


of Plan-Based Awards During Fiscal Year 2007” table on page 37 below. The Compensation Committee set as a performance vesting condition for these SARs and phantom share awards its determination that we achieved positive cash flow from our operations in the second half of our 2007 fiscal year, excluding the effects of the sale of our French operations. In addition, to protect our cash flow, the maximum payout for each SAR is capped at four times the exercise price. If the performance condition is met, the phantom shares will vest in full three years after the grant date and the SARs will vest in equal annual installments over a three-year period.
“Over-Cap” Awards Delayed from 2006.   The 2006 fiscal year were establishedannual incentive compensation agreements for each executive officer atof Messrs. Mezger, Cecere and Hollinger limited the beginningamount of their annual incentive award payout for the year and included pretax profit, unit deliveries, community count, customer satisfaction metrics,debt-to-capital ratios, expense control and other performance hurdles specificthat could be paid in cash. The remaining “over-cap” amounts would have been deferred into three-year restricted stock granted in January 2007 when the cash portion was paid. Due to an executive officer’s responsibilities and relevant Company business goals.
Long-Term Incentive Compensation. Long-term incentive compensation consists of stock option grants, awards of sharesa blackout necessitated by the Review, the “over-cap” grant of restricted stock was delayed until July 2007. The Compensation Committee granted phantom shares in lieu of restricted stock in the following amounts: Mr. Mezger 55,264, Mr. Cecere 15,751, and Mr. Hollinger 1,037. These phantom shares vest in full three years from date of grant.
October 2007 Grant.   Our CEO’s Employment Agreement specifies that he is eligible to participate in our equity compensation plans on terms and conditions that are generally applicable to our other senior officers and is eligible to receive equity grants from time to time, in each case at the Compensation Committee’s discretion. Returning to our traditional practice of granting long-term incentive awards in October for the subsequent fiscal year, in October 2007, the Compensation Committee granted to our CEO 137,500 stock options and 412,500 SARs for his 2008 fiscal year long-term incentive award. The Compensation Committee also awarded 2008 fiscal year long-term incentive grants to our other NEOs, consisting of a combination of SARs and phantom shares, the amounts of which are included in the “Grants of Plan-Based Awards During Fiscal Year 2007” table on page 37 below. The Compensation Committee set as a performance unitsvesting condition for these SARs and phantom share awards its determination that we generated cash flow such that the ratio of net debt (total debt less cash) to total capitalization (the sum of net debt and total stockholders’ equity) does not exceed 50% as of August 31, 2008. If the performance condition is met, the phantom shares and SARs will vest in the same manner as the phantom shares and SARs that were granted in July 2007, as described under the Company’sheading “Grant Delayed from 2006” on page 31 above.
Unit Performance Program.   For several years, our long-term incentives have included performance unit grants under our Unit Performance Program (the “UPP”(“UPP”). Ordinarily, the Company makes annual grants of stock options, shares of restricted Common Stock and performance units to executive officers. However, due to a review of the Company’s stock option grant practices by a subcommittee of the Audit and Compliance Committee of the Board of Directors, the Company did not make any annual grants of long-term incentive compensation to executive officers in the 2006 fiscal year. As part of the new corporate governance initiatives discussed on page 5 above, the Committee is reviewing the Company’s executive compensation programs and, as part of its review, may approve grants of long-term incentive compensation to executive officers in the Company’s 2007 fiscal year in recognition of contributions made in the 2006 fiscal year.
Stock Option Grants. Stock options are granted to executive officers based on a subjective evaluation by the Committee of a recipient’s contribution to the Company’s and/or his or her respective operational area’s performance, as well as peer company practices. Stock options may be granted occasionally to new hires or in connection with promotions. Typically, the Company grants fixed-price stock options that vest in installments of 33% on each anniversary of the date of grant, and, therefore, do not fully vest until 3 years after they are granted. Because the value of stock option awards increase only if the price of the Company’s Common Stock increases after grant, this vesting schedule is intended to motivate executive officers to enhance Company performance and stockholder value over a long-term period. Stock option grants are also intended to promote executive stock ownership.
Awards of Restricted Stock. Awards of shares of restricted Common Stock are granted to executive officers annually based on similar criteria as annual stock option grants. Typically, the Company grants shares of restricted Common Stock that do not vest until 3 years after they are granted. This vesting schedule is intended to motivate executive officers to enhance Company performance and stockholder value over a long-term period and also serves as a retention tool.
Performance Units. In October 2005, the Committee awarded performance units for the fiscal 2006-2008 performance period to all executive officers and certain other members of senior management under the UPP, which was first implemented in 1996. Each performance unit provides a payout to a recipient only if specific goals set by the Compensation Committee are achieved at the end of a three-year period with respect to the following two performance metrics: (a) theour cumulative diluted earnings per share of the Company and (b) the average pretaxpre-tax return on investment of the operations for which the recipient is responsible.
If applicable performance goals are achieved, the value of a performance unit at the end of the three-year performance cycleperiod depends on the degree to which the performance goals are exceeded and the Compensation Committee’s weighting of the two performance

38


metrics at the time the performance unit is awarded. For allRecipients must remain employed with us for the entire three-year period to which a performance unit relates to receive a payout.
In October 2004, the Compensation Committee granted performance units awarded to the executive officerseach of our NEOs (other than Mr. Barnard) and to other members of our senior management for the fiscal 2006-20082005-2007 performance period, which ended on November 30, 2007. The cumulative diluted earnings per share will determinemetric determined 75% of the value of these performance units and the award and pretaxaverage pre-tax return on investment will determinemetric determined the remaining 25%. If a payout is earned, a performance unit may be paid in cash, stock or stock equivalents. Please see “Long-Term Incentive Plans – Awards in Last Fiscal Year”Based on page 49 belowthe results for the performance units awarded to each Named Executive Officer forperiod, our NEOs received the fiscal 2006-2008 performance period.
   At the end of the 2006 fiscal year, executive officers earned a cash payout on performance units awarded to them in 2003. The Named Executive Officers received payouts on such performance units as follows:following payouts: Mr. Mezger $746,250,$97,500, Mr. Cecere $525,000, Mr. Freed $375,000,$38,500, Mr. Hollinger $375,000$33,000, and Mr. Masuda $37,500.
Cash Compensation Caps. Beginning in 2003, to promote executive stock ownership and to further motivate executives to improve the Company’s performance on a longer term basis, the Company introduced caps on the amount of annual cash incentive compensation paid to certain executives, and incentive amounts earned in excess of the caps are paid in shares of restricted Common Stock. For the 2006 fiscal year, maximum cash incentive compensation was set at $5,000,000 for Mr. Karatz (pursuant to his Employment Agreement), $2,500,000 for Mr. Mezger, $2,000,000 for$5,500. Mr. Freed and $750,000 for Mr. Cecere and Mr. Hollinger. Grants of restricted Common Stockdid not receive any payout with respect to these performance units due to the Named Executive Officers are set forthtermination of his employment with us in the table entitled “Summary Compensation Table” on pages 46-47 below.July 2007.
 Stock Ownership Guidelines. In 1998,
The Compensation Committee did not make any new grants of performance units under the Committee adopted an executive stock ownership policy designed to further align the interestsUPP in 2006 or 2007. There is one remaining grant of management and stockholders. The policy requires the Named Executive Officers, as well as other senior corporate and divisional managers, to achieve specified ownership levels of the Company’s Common Stock. The policy has been updated from time to time since its adoption. The current target for all executive officers is ownership of Common StockUPP performance units currently in effect, with a value equalperformance period ending on November 30, 2008. All current NEOs received performance units under that UPP grant.
Benefits.  Most of our benefits are provided to five times base salary except Mr. Mezger. The target for Mr. Mezger in the 2006 fiscal year was 10 times his base salary. The amount of Common Stock beneficially owned by each of the Named Executive Officers,all employees, including Mr. Mezger, far exceeds their respective ownership guidelines.
Compensation of Chief Executive Officer in 2006. While he served as the Chief Executive Officer in the 2006 fiscal year, Mr. Karatzour NEOs. During 2007, our NEOs also (a) received $1,185,417 in salary. This amount was in line with the $1,250,000 base salary the Board of Directors approved for Mr. Karatz for the 2006 fiscal year pursuant to his Employment Agreement. Pursuant to a November 2006 Tolling Agreement between the Companysupplemental medical, dental and Mr. Karatz, the Company agreed to pay Mr. Karatz the dollar value of all accrued and unpaid vacation benefits based on Mr. Karatz’s base salary and unreimbursed business expenses through the date of his departure. Under the Tolling Agreement, the Company retained and suspended the payment ofvision benefit that reimbursed any other compensation and benefits to Mr. Karatz that may be payable under his Employment Agreement or the Company’s compensation programs, as further described under “Certain Agreements with Mr. Karatz” on page 42 below.out-of-pocket health care
   Mr. Mezger became the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer in November 2006, replacing Mr. Karatz. Prior to his appointment, Mr. Mezger served as the Company’s Chief Operat-


32

39


ing Officer. In the 2006 fiscal year, Mr. Mezger received $568,750 in base salary. Mr. Mezger also received incentive compensation of $4,500,000. Because of the Company’s cash incentive compensation limits, $2,000,000 of Mr. Mezger’s total incentive compensation will be paid to him in the form of shares of restricted Common Stock, as described in footnote (a) to the table on page 46 below. Mr. Mezger did not receive any additional compensation in the 2006 fiscal year
expenses that qualify for serving as President and Chief Executive Officer.
   In December 2006, the Board of Directors approved an increase in Mr. Mezger’s annual base salary to $1 million.
   Mr. Mezger participatesa tax deduction under Internal Revenue Service guidelines; (b) participated in the KB Home Retirement Plan (except for Mr. Masuda), which is described under the heading “Retirement Programs” below; (c) were provided with a life insurance death benefit payable to their designated beneficiaries (beginning in 2004, only term life insurance, with a $750,000 benefit level, has been made available to incoming eligible executives); and the KB Home Death Benefit Only(d) were entitled to participate in an unfunded nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan, which allows pre-tax contributions of base salary and annual incentive compensation. We provide a dollar-for-dollar match of Deferred Compensation Plan and 401(k) Savings Plan contributions of up to an aggregate amount of six percent of a participant’s base salary. These benefits are offered to attract key executive talent, promote retention and to compensate for contribution limits applicable to our 401(k) Savings Plan. Our 401(k) Savings Plan is available to all full-time employees with a similar dollar-for-dollar match benefit. Messrs. Mezger and Cecere are participants in a program under which they are credited with a specific number of vacation hours that remains fixed throughout their employment with us, regardless of actual vacation time taken. When their employment with us ends, they are entitled to receive a payout of these vacation hours that is based on their then-current annual base salaries. This program is closed to new participants.
PolicyPerquisites.  Perquisites provided to our NEOs previously included automobile allowances, company-paid automobile fuel cards, and reimbursement of expenses for automobile insurance, annual financial planning and tax preparation services, and one-time estate planning services. These perquisites were discontinued in 2007. Infrequently, family members accompanied NEOs on Deductibilitybusiness trips on an aircraft we owned, subject to seat availability. We did not incur any additional incremental cost in providing this benefit. On a single occasion in 2007, we incurred incremental cost from a personal use of Compensationour aircraft. We sold our aircraft in December 2007. From time to time, we also make available to our employees, including our NEOs, for their personal use tickets to certain sporting events that are purchased as a season subscription for business purposes. We do not incur any additional incremental costs with such use. In our 2007 fiscal year, we paid legal expenses our CEO incurred in negotiating his Employment Agreement.
Employment Agreements and Post-Termination Payments
 
Employment Agreements and Severance Arrangements.  Mr. Mezger is the only NEO with whom we have an employment agreement. His Employment Agreement provides him with certain severance benefits, discussed under the heading “Employment Agreements and Potential Payments upon Termination of Employment or Change in Control” on pages 44-47 below.
Following a review of executive severance policies at peer homebuilding companies and other similarly sized public companies, the Compensation Committee adopted an Executive Severance Plan in 2007 for non-change in control situations. All of our NEOs are currently participants under the plan. The Company intendsplan provides a specified severance benefit that varies by seniority, as discussed further under the heading “Employment Agreements and Potential Payments upon Termination of Employment or Change in Control” on pages 44-47 below.
We also maintain a Change in Control Severance Plan (“CIC Plan”) that provides certain severance benefits on a change in control of us, as discussed further under the heading “Employment Agreements and Potential Payments upon Termination of Employment or Change in Control” on pages 44-47 below. The objectives of the CIC Plan are to: (a) enable and encourage our management to complyfocus its attention on obtaining the best possible deal for our stockholders in a change in control scenario and to make objective evaluations of all possible transactions, without being distracted by the possible impact such transactions may have on job security and benefits, (b) promote management continuity, and (c) provide income protection in the event of involuntary loss of employment.
Retirement Programs.  Our 401(k) Savings Plan, a defined contribution plan, is the only program we offer to all full-time employees that provides post-employment benefits. Our NEOs and certain other senior executives also participate in our Deferred Compensation Plan, as discussed above. Details of NEO deferrals under the Deferred Compensation Plan are provided in the “Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation During Fiscal Year 2007” table on page 44 below.
We maintain a Retirement Plan for selected executives that is now closed to new participants. Participation has been closed since 2004. The Retirement Plan provides each vested participant with a specific annual dollar amount


33


for 20 years commencing following the later of (a) the participant’s reaching age 55, (b) the tenth anniversary of the date the participant commenced his or her participation, or (c) the termination of the participant’s employment with us. Mr. Mezger’s original annual benefit amount under the Retirement Plan was $450,000. For the other NEO participants (Mr. Masuda does not participate), the original annual benefit amount under the Retirement Plan was $100,000. For each participant, the annual benefit amount is increased by annualcost-of-living adjustments, starting with the plan year ending November 30, 2006. Vesting generally requires five years of participation and, once vested, the participant is entitled to his or her full benefit. Details of NEO participation in the Retirement Plan are provided in the “Pension Benefits During Fiscal Year 2007” table on page 43 below.
Payments Due Upon Termination of Employmentand/or a Change in Control.  In addition to the severance arrangements mentioned above, in the event of a change in control of us there is accelerated vesting of any unvested benefits under our Deferred Compensation Plan, our Retirement Plan and certain of our employee benefit plans, including our equity compensation plans. Further discussion of the payments to which our NEOs may be entitled on termination of their employmentand/or a change in control of us is provided under the heading “Employment Agreements and Potential Payments upon Termination of Employment or Change in Control” on pages 44-47 below.
Other Material Tax and Accounting Implications of the Executive Compensation Program
We generally structure our programs with the intent of complying with the requirements of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code with respectSection 162(m) in order to maintainingmaintain federal tax deductibility for all executive compensation. Section 162(m) generally disallows a tax deduction for compensation except in circumstancesover $1 million paid to our highest paid executives unless it is qualifying performance-based compensation. The Compensation Committee considers these tax consequences when determining the Management Developmentmix of compensation paid to our NEOs and other senior executives, and seeks to balance tax deductibility benefits with the need to provide effective compensation packages. Although the Compensation Committee believes that such compliance wouldthe majority of the potential compensation payable to our NEOs and other senior executives should be based on the achievement of qualified performance-based targets, it will approve compensation that may not be deductible under Section 162(m) where it believes it is in theour and our stockholders’ best interests ofto do so. In 2007, the Company or its stockholders.Compensation Committee believed that it was in our best interests to pay our CEO an annual discretionary bonus, as discussed under the heading “Annual Incentives and Discretionary Bonuses” onpages 29-30 above, even though the payment was not deductible under Section 162(m).
 This report
Other Compensation Policies
Equity Stock Ownership Policy.  We have had an executive stock ownership policy since 1998. It is respectfully submitteddesigned to encourage, and has encouraged, our executives to increase their ownership of our common stock over time and to align their interests with our stockholders’ interests. In February 2008, the Compensation Committee amended the policy, as described below. The policy continues to encourage meaningful long-term stock ownership as a key component of our executive compensation program.
The policy identifies specific levels of stock ownership that designated executives are expected to achieve, targeted from one-to-five times base salary. The targeted stock ownership levels for our NEOs range from two-to-five times base salary. Designated executives have five years to achieve these ownership levels and must make meaningful progress every year towards the achievement of these ownership levels. Benchmark survey data and multiples of average base salaries per level were used to determine the ownership expected for each position. Share ownership may include shares owned outright by a designated executive, shares owned indirectly through our 401(k) Savings Plan and 60% of unvested restricted stock grants or phantom share rights. Phantom share rights are included due to the memberslimited number of shares currently available for grant under our existing stockholder-approved equity compensation plans. Once required ownership levels are achieved, they must be maintained throughout the Committee:executive’s employment. Our policy provides both financial incentives to achieve ownership requirements as well as material consequences for non-compliance or failure to make meaningful progress toward compliance. The Compensation Committee may, from time to time, reevaluate and revise the ownership requirements to account for material changes in stock price. Our NEOs are currently in compliance with the policy or have made meaningful progress towards compliance.
Dr. Ray R. Irani,Chairman


34

Mr. James A. Johnson
Mr. J. Terrence Lanni
Mr. Leslie Moonves
Mr. Luis G. Nogales

40


KB HomeEquity-Based Award Grant Policy.  On February 1, 2007, the Compensation Committee adopted a policy that governs the timing of equity-based awards and establishes certain internal controls over the grant of equity-based awards. The policy is designed to enhance the process by which we grant equity-based awards, including stock options SARs, phantom shares and restricted stock.
Common Stock Price Performance
 
The graph below comparespolicy requires all grants of equity-based awards, and their terms, to be approved by the cumulative total return of KB Home Common Stock,Compensation Committee (or the S&P Homebuilding Index, the Dow Jones Home Construction Index, and the S&P 500 Index for the last five fiscal year-end periods.
Last Five Fiscal Years
(PERFORMANCE GRAPH)
                         
  2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
             
KB Home  100   134   207   268   431   326 
S&P 500 Homebuilding Index  100   120   237   274   398   321 
Dow Jones Home Construction Index  100   118   230   262   354   282 
S&P 500 Index  100   83   96   108   118   134 
Board). The above graph is based upon the Common Stock and index prices calculated aspolicy does not permit any delegation of the last trading day before December 1stCompensation Committee’s (or the Board’s) granting authority to our management. The grant date of any equity-based award will be the fiscal year-end periods presented. Our November 30, 2006date on which the Compensation Committee met to approve the grant unless a written resolution sets a later date. The exercise price of any stock option award will not be less than the closing Common Stock price of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange was $51.69 per share. On February 14,on the grant date. All equity-based award grants made in 2007 were made in compliance with the policy and were approved at regular Compensation Committee meetings in July and October 2007, as discussed under the heading “Long-Term Incentives” on pages 30-32 above.
Recovery of Compensation.  Under his Employment Agreement, our Common Stock closed at $54.13 per share. The performanceCEO is required to repay certain bonus and incentive- or equity-based compensation he receives if we are required to restate our financial statements as a result of our Common Stock depicted inhis misconduct, consistent with Section 304 of the graphs above represents past performance only and is not indicativeSarbanes-Oxley Act of future performance. Total return assumes $100 invested at market close on November 30, 2001 in KB Home, the S&P 500 Index, the S&P 500 Homebuilding Index, and the Dow Jones Home Construction Index including reinvestment of dividends.2002.
Summary Compensation Table
                                                
                     Change in
        
                     Pension Value
        
                     and
        
                     Nonqualified
        
                  Non-Equity
  Deferred
        
            Stock
  Option
  Incentive Plan
  Compensation
  All Other
     
  Name and
  Fiscal
  Salary
  Bonus
  Awards
  Awards
  Compensation
  Earnings
  Compensation
  Total
  
  Principal Position  Year  ($)  ($)(a)  ($)(b)  ($)(c)  ($)(d)  ($)(e)  ($)(f)  ($)  
Jeffrey T. Mezger   2007   $1,000,000   $6,000,000   $4,181,624   $3,743,258   $97,500   $388,632   $972,604   $16,383,618   
President and Chief Executive Officer
                                               
                                                
Domenico Cecere   2007    595,834    0    376,181    90,560    438,500    86,362    114,295    1,701,732   
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
                                               
                                                
William R. Hollinger   2007    347,083    350,000    123,273    107,703    483,000    83,116    121,111    1,615,286   
Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
                                               
                                                
Glen W. Barnard   2007    289,168    0    98,662    96,478    600,000    79,716    95,069    1,259,093   
Senior Vice President,
KBnxt Group
                                               
                                                
Kelly K. Masuda   2007    296,771    100,000    78,837    85,238    355,500    0    96,459    1,012,805   
Senior Vice President and Treasurer
                                               
                                                
Former NEO
                                               
Robert Freed*   2007    256,500    0    640,057    95,803    0    86,362    2,821,997    3,900,719   
Senior Vice President,
Investment Strategy
                                               
                                                
(a)Bonus:  The amounts reported in this column reflect discretionary bonuses paid to Messrs. Mezger, Hollinger and Masuda. These are described under the heading “Annual Incentives and Discretionary Bonuses” on pages 29-30 above.
(b)Stock Awards:  The amounts reported in this column reflect the aggregate compensation expense we recognized in our 2007 fiscal year for shares of restricted stock and phantom shares granted to our NEOs, computed in accordance with SFAS 123(R) (disregarding estimates of forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions). Information used in determining these amounts can be found in Note 15 of the Notes to


35

41


the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in our Annual report onForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2007. The “Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End 2007” table on pages 39-40 below and its associated footnotes contain additional information about our NEOs’ respective equity award holdings. The amount reported in this column for Mr. Freed reflects the aggregate compensation costs we recognized for his equity awards through the date on which his employment with us ended.
(c)Option Awards:  The amounts reported in this column reflect the aggregate compensation expense we recognized in our 2007 fiscal year for stock option and SAR awards granted to our NEOs, computed in accordance with SFAS 123(R) (disregarding estimates of forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions). Information used in determining these amounts can be found in Note 15 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in our Annual Report onForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2007. The “Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End 2007” table on pages 39-40 below and its associated footnotes contain additional information about our NEOs’ respective option award holdings. The amount reported in this column for Mr. Freed reflects the aggregate compensation costs we recognized for his option awards through the date on which his employment with us ended.
(d)Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation:  The amounts reported in this column reflect annual incentive compensation the respective NEOs earned based on achieving applicable 2007 fiscal year performance goals and payouts of UPP performance units corresponding to the2005-2007 performance period. Mr. Freed did not receive any non-equity incentive plan compensation due to the termination of his employment with us.
(e)Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings:  The amounts reported in this column reflect the change in present value during our 2007 fiscal year of accumulated benefits we provide under our Retirement Plan. Above-market or preferential earnings are not provided under our Deferred Compensation Plan.
(f)All Other Compensation:  The amounts reported in this column consist primarily of offsetting payments we made in 2007 to the NEOs and other employees who held stock options for which we increased the exercise price based on Internal Revenue Code Section 409A consequences resulting from the Review, as further discussed under the heading “Option Exercise Price Adjustment Payments” on page 38 below. For our NEOs, the aggregate offsetting payments were: Mr. Mezger $758,956, Mr. Cecere $85,921, Mr. Hollinger $87,393, Mr. Barnard $58,720, Mr. Masuda $65,583, and Mr. Freed $95,946. The remainder of the amounts reported in this column consist of the following items:
Perquisites:  Perquisites provided to the NEOs include automobile allowances, company-paid automobile fuel cards, and reimbursement of expenses for automobile insurance, annual financial planning and tax preparation services, and one-time estate planning services. These perquisites were discontinued, effective July 1, 2007. Included in the amounts reported for Mr. Mezger are $135,484 in legal expenses, which were incurred in negotiating his Employment Agreement, and $4,290 of incremental costs associated with personal use of an aircraft we owned in our 2007 fiscal year. We sold our aircraft in December 2007.
Matching 401(k) Savings Plan and Supplemental Deferred Compensation Plan Contributions:  We provide a dollar-for-dollar match of Deferred Compensation Plan and 401(k) Savings Plan contributions of up to an aggregate amount of six percent of a participant’s base salary. The aggregate 2007 fiscal year matching contributions we made to each NEO were as follows: Mr. Mezger $57,125, Mr. Cecere $13,500, Mr. Hollinger $20,825, Mr. Barnard $17,350, Mr. Masuda $9,550, and Mr. Freed $9,320.
Premium Payments:  We paid premiums on supplemental medical expense reimbursement plans and life insurance policies for the benefit of participating executives. These plans and policies are described under the heading “Benefits” on pages 32-33 above. The aggregate premiums we paid in our 2007 fiscal year for each NEO for these plans and policies were as follows: Mr. Mezger $9,043, Mr. Cecere $8,083, Mr. Hollinger $5,781, Mr. Barnard $8,552, Mr. Masuda $8,552, and Mr. Freed $4,934.
Post-Employment Incentive Compensation Payout:  When his employment with us ended in July 2007, Mr. Freed became entitled to an aggregate payment of $2,702,484 representing incentive compensation he earned in prior fiscal years. To comply with Internal Revenue Code Section 409A, this payment was made on February 1, 2008.
 *Mr. Freed’s employment with us ended on July 15, 2007.


36


Grants of Plan-Based Awards During Fiscal Year 2007
                                                           
         Estimated Possible Payouts Under
  Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity
              
         Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards  Incentive Plan Awards(d)              
                           All Other
  All Other
     Grant
  
                           Stock
  Option
     Date
  
                           Awards:
  Awards:
  Exercise
  Fair
  
                           Number
  Number of
  or Base
  Value of
  
                           of Shares
  Securities
  Price of
  Stock and
  
                           of Stock
  Underlying
  Option
  Option
  
   Grant
  Type of
  Threshold
  Target
  Maximum
  Threshold
  Target
  Maximum
  or Units
  Options
  Awards
  Awards
  
  Name  Date(a)  Award  ($)  ($)  ($)  (#)  (#)  (#)  (#)  (#)  ($/Sh)  ($)(e)  
                                                           
Mr. Mezger               (b)                                          
                                                           
                                                           
    7/12/07   Stock Options                                    325,050   $36.19   $3,819,695   
                                                           
                                                           
    7/12/07   Stock Options                                    325,050    36.19    4,000,044   
                                                           
                                                           
    7/12/07   Restricted Stock                13,500    54,000    81,000                   2,000,233   
                                                           
                                                           
    7/12/07   Phantom Shares                               55,264              2,000,004   
                                                           
                                                           
    10/4/07   Stock Options                                    137,500    28.10    1,177,210   
                                                           
                                                           
    10/4/07   SARs                     412,500                        3,355,028   
                                                           
                                                           
Mr. Cecere               (c)  $1,800,000                                      
                                                           
                                                           
    7/12/07   SARs                     29,939                        350,002   
                                                           
                                                           
    7/12/07   Phantom Shares                               15,751              570,029   
                                                           
                                                           
    7/12/07   Phantom Shares                     9,672                        350,030   
                                                           
                                                           
Mr. Hollinger               (c)   875,000                                      
                                                           
                                                           
    7/12/07   SARs                     25,662                        300,002   
                                                           
                                                           
    7/12/07   Phantom Shares                               1,037              37,529   
                                                           
                                                           
    7/12/07   Phantom Shares                     8,290                        300,015   
                                                           
                                                           
    10/4/07   SARs                     36,885                        300,001   
                                                           
                                                           
    10/4/07   Phantom Shares                     10,677                        300,024   
                                                           
                                                           
Mr. Barnard               (c)   1,250,000                                      
                                                           
                                                           
    7/12/07   SARs                     21,385                        250,001   
                                                           
                                                           
    7/12/07   Phantom Shares                     6,908                        250,001   
                                                           
                                                           
    10/4/07   SARS                     36,885                        300,001   
                                                           
                                                           
    10/4/07   Phantom Shares                     10,677                        300,024   
                                                           
                                                           
Mr. Masuda               (c)   743,750                                      
                                                           
                                                           
    7/12/07   SARs                     17,108                        200,001   
                                                           
                                                           
    7/12/07   Phantom Shares                     5,527                        200,022   
                                                           
                                                           
    10/4/07   SARS                     24,590                        200,001   
                                                           
                                                           
    10/4/07   Phantom Shares                     7,118                        200,016   
                                                           
                                                           
Former NEO
                                                          
                                                           
Mr. Freed               (c)   2,280,000                                      
                                                           
                                                           
(a)Grant Date:  The grant date for each award is the date the Compensation Committee approved the award. The exercise price for each award is equal to the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant (if applicable to the award granted). Mr. Freed was not granted any plan-based awards in our 2007 fiscal year.
(b)Mr. Mezger’s annual incentive for our 2007 fiscal year was based on a specified percentage of our pre-tax, pre-incentive profit, as discussed under the heading “Annual Incentives and Discretionary Bonuses” on pages 29-30 above. Therefore, this annual incentive at the time it was granted did not have an estimated possible threshold, target or maximum payout amount. We do not believe it is possible to provide a representative “target” amount for this annual incentive based on our 2006 fiscal year performance because Mr. Mezger served as our Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer for substantially all of that year and thus had different responsibilities and

37


performance objectives. If his 2007 fiscal year annual incentive arrangement were applied to our 2006 fiscal year performance, however, the amount of the payout would have been $21,168,500. Because Mr. Mezger did not qualify for a payout under his 2007 fiscal year annual incentive, no payout amount is reported under the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column in the “Summary Compensation Table” on page 35 above.
(c)In setting annual incentive arrangements for Messrs. Cecere, Hollinger, Barnard and Masuda for our 2007 fiscal year, the Compensation Committee did not set any specific target payout amounts. Rather, it set only maximum payout amounts, as shown in the table above. These annual incentives are described under the heading “Annual Incentives and Discretionary Bonuses” on pages 29-30 above. The actual annual incentive payouts the Compensation Committee approved for these four NEOs were significantly lower, and were as follows: Mr. Cecere $400,000, Mr. Hollinger $450,000, Mr. Barnard $600,000, and Mr. Masuda $350,000. These payout amounts are reported under the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column in the “Summary Compensation Table” on page 35 above. The Compensation Committee also set an annual incentive for Mr. Freed for our 2007 fiscal year that was based on achieving specified performance goals relating to his roles as our Senior Vice President, Investment Strategy and as a regional manager for our Northern California operations. The Compensation Committee did not set a specific target payout for Mr. Freed’s annual incentive, only a maximum amount as shown in the table above. Since Mr. Freed’s employment with us ended during our 2007 fiscal year, he did not receive any payout under this annual incentive and no payout amount is reported under the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column in the “Summary Compensation Table.”
(d)Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards:  Mr. Mezger will vest in the specified threshold, target and maximum amounts relating to the restricted stock/performance shares granted to him on July 12, 2007 depending on our total stockholder return relative to our peer group, as further discussed under the heading “CEO Employment Agreement Grants” on page 31 above. The SARs and phantom shares reported in this column that were granted to the NEOs on July 12, 2007 and October 4, 2007 will vest in the specified target amounts if the Compensation Committee determines that the applicable performance vesting conditions are satisfied, as further discussed under the heading “Long-Term Incentives” onpages 30-32 above.
(e)Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards: The grant date fair value reported in this column for each award is computed in accordance with SFAS 123(R).
Option Exercise Price Adjustment Payments
As described in our Annual Report onForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2006, the Review found that we used incorrect measurement dates with respect to eight annual employee stock option grants made between October 1998 and October 2005. In order to comply with Internal Revenue Code Section 409A, we increased the exercise prices of certain of these stock option grants in late 2006 and, in early 2007, made an offsetting payment to employees who held these adjusted stock options. These offsetting payments to our NEOs are reported in the “Summary Compensation Table” on page 35 above. The stock options reported in the “Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End 2007” table on pages 39-40 below reflect the adjusted exercise prices, as applicable.


38


Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End 2007
                                                     
       Option Awards   Stock Awards
               Options
                   Equity
       
               Awards
                   Incentive
   Equity
   
               Equity
                   Plan
   Incentive
   
               Incentive
               Market
   Awards:
   Plan Awards:
   
               Plan Awards:
           Number
   Value of
   Number of
   Market or
   
               Number of
           of Shares
   Shares or
   Unearned
   Payout Value
   
       Number of
   Number of
   Securities
           or Units
   Units of
   Shares,
   of Unearned
   
       Securities
   Securities
   Underlying
           of Stock
   Stock
   Units or
   Shares, Units
   
       Underlying
   Underlying
   Unexercised
           That
   That
   Other
   or Other
   
       Unexercised
   Unexercised
   Unearned
   Option
       Have
   Have
   Rights That
   Rights That
   
       Options
   Options
   Options/
   Exercise
   Option
   Not
   Not
   Have Not
   Have Not
   
       Exercisable
   Unexercisable
   SARs
   Price
   Expiration
   Vested
   Vested
   Vested
   Vested
   
  Name  Grant Date   (#)   (#)(a)   (#)(b)   ($)   Date   (#)   ($)(c)   (#)(d)   ($)(e)   
Mr. Mezger   10/30/01    431,122             $13.95    10/30/16                       
                                                     
    10/30/01    68,878              13.95    10/30/16                       
                                                     
    2/13/02    102,090              20.07    2/13/17                       
                                                     
    5/8/02    44,516              25.63    5/8/17                       
                                                     
    10/7/02    400,000              21.51    10/7/17                       
                                                     
    10/24/03    74,667              33.24(f)   10/24/18                       
                                                     
    10/24/03    149,333              34.05(f)   10/24/18                       
                                                     
    10/22/04    80,750              40.90    10/22/19                       
                                                     
    10/22/04    119,250              40.90    10/22/19                       
                                                     
    1/14/05                             51,150   $1,068,524             
                                                     
    10/18/05    50,000    25,000         63.77    10/18/15                       
                                                     
    10/21/05                             25,000    522,250             
                                                     
    1/13/06                             80,343    1,678,365             
                                                     
    7/12/07         325,050         36.19    11/30/16(g)                      
                                                     
    7/12/07         325,050         36.19    7/12/17                       
                                                     
    7/12/07                        7/12/17              54,000   $1,128,060   
                                                     
    7/12/07                             55,264    1,154,465             
                                                     
    10/4/07         137,500         28.10    10/4/17                       
                                                     
    10/4/07              412,500    28.10    10/4/17                       
                                                     
Mr. Cecere   4/23/02    100,000             $25.17    4/23/17                       
                                                     
    10/7/02    80,000              21.51    10/7/17                       
                                                     
    10/24/03    14,934              33.24(f)   10/24/18                       
                                                     
    10/24/03    29,866              34.05(f)   10/24/18                       
                                                     
    10/22/04    20,000              40.90    10/22/19                       
                                                     
    1/14/05                             2,924   $61,082             
                                                     
    10/18/05    4,000    2,000         63.77    10/18/15                       
                                                     
    10/21/05                             2,500    52,225             
                                                     
    1/13/06                             5,241    109,484             
                                                     
    7/12/07              29,939    36.19    7/12/17                       
                                                     
    7/12/07                                       9,672   $202,048   
                                                     
    7/12/07                             15,751    329,038             
                                                     


39


                                                     
       Option Awards   Stock Awards
               Options
                   Equity
       
               Awards
                   Incentive
   Equity
   
               Equity
                   Plan
   Incentive
   
               Incentive
               Market
   Awards:
   Plan Awards:
   
               Plan Awards:
           Number
   Value of
   Number of
   Market or
   
               Number of
           of Shares
   Shares or
   Unearned
   Payout Value
   
       Number of
   Number of
   Securities
           or Units
   Units of
   Shares,
   of Unearned
   
       Securities
   Securities
   Underlying
           of Stock
   Stock
   Units or
   Shares, Units
   
       Underlying
   Underlying
   Unexercised
           That
   That
   Other
   or Other
   
       Unexercised
   Unexercised
   Unearned
   Option
       Have
   Have
   Rights That
   Rights That
   
       Options
   Options
   Options/
   Exercise
   Option
   Not
   Not
   Have Not
   Have Not
   
       Exercisable
   Unexercisable
   SARs
   Price
   Expiration
   Vested
   Vested
   Vested
   Vested
   
  Name  Grant Date   (#)   (#)(a)   (#)(b)   ($)   Date   (#)   ($)(c)   (#)(d)   ($)(e)   
Mr. Hollinger   7/1/02    58,058             $26.29    7/1/17                       
                                                     
    10/7/02    60,000              21.51    10/7/17                       
                                                     
    10/24/03    9,334              33.24(f)   10/24/18                       
                                                     
    10/24/03    18,666              34.05(f)   10/24/18                       
                                                     
    10/22/04    24,000              40.90    10/22/19                       
                                                     
    10/18/05    4,000    2,000         63.77    10/18/15                       
                                                     
    10/21/05                             2,500   $52,225             
                                                     
    7/12/07              25,662    36.19    7/12/17                       
                                                     
    7/12/07                             1,037    21,663             
                                                     
    7/12/07                                       8,290   $173,178   
                                                     
    10/4/07              36,885    28.10    10/4/17                       
                                                     
    10/4/07                                       10,677    223,043   
                                                     
Mr. Barnard   3/1/04    30,000             $38.24    3/1/19                       
                                                     
    10/22/04    20,000              40.90    10/22/19                       
                                                     
    10/18/05    2,667    1,333         63.77    10/18/15                       
                                                     
    10/21/05                             2,000   $41,780             
                                                     
    7/12/07              21,385    36.19    7/12/17                       
                                                     
    7/12/07                                       6,908   $144,308   
                                                     
    10/4/07              36,885    28.10    10/4/17                       
                                                     
    10/4/07                                       10,677    223,043   
                                                     
Mr. Masuda   9/2/03    10,000             $28.71    9/2/18                       
                                                     
    10/24/03    3,334              33.24(f)   10/24/18                       
                                                     
    10/24/03    6,666              34.05(f)   10/24/19                       
                                                     
    10/22/04    20,000              40.90    10/22/19                       
                                                     
    10/18/05    3,334    1,666         63.77    10/18/15                       
                                                     
    10/21/05                             2,000   $41,780             
                                                     
    7/12/07              17,108    36.19    7/12/17                       
                                                     
    7/12/07                                       5,527   $115,459   
                                                     
    10/4/07              24,590    28.10    10/4/17                       
                                                     
    10/4/07                                       7,118    148,695   
                                                     
(a)Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options - Unexercisable:  Stock option awards generally vest in equal installment amounts over a three-year period.
(b)Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options/SARs:  The items reported in this column consist of SARs that are subject to a performance-vesting condition, as discussed under the heading “Long-Term Incentives” on pages 30-32 above.

40


(c)Market Value of Shares That Have Not Vested:  The market value specified in this column is based on the closing price of our common stock on November 30, 2007, which was $20.89.
(d)Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares That Have Not Vested:  The 54,000 shares of restricted stock granted to Mr. Mezger on July 12, 2007 are performance shares that vest as described under the heading “CEO Employment Agreement Grants” on page 31 above. The remaining rights reported in this column consist of phantom shares that are subject to a performance-vesting condition, as discussed under the heading “Long-Term Incentives” on pages 30-32 above.
(e)Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market Value of Unearned Shares That Have Not Vested:  The market value specified in this column is based on the closing price of our common stock on November 30, 2007, which was $20.89.
(f)As discussed under the heading “Option Exercise Price Adjustment Payments” on page 38 above, as a result of the Review, we adjusted the exercise price of certain stock options held by our employees. In order to comply with Internal Revenue Code Section 409A, the exercise price for a certain portion of the stock option grant made on October 24, 2003 was not adjusted.
(g)The expiration date for these promotional stock options is set under Mr. Mezger’s Employment Agreement. These promotional stock options are further discussed under the heading “CEO Promotion Grant” on page 31 above.


41


Option Exercises and Stock Vested During Fiscal Year 2007
                       
   Option Awards   Stock Awards
   Number
       Number
       
   of Shares
   Value
   of Shares
   Value
   
   Acquired
   Realized
   Acquired
   Realized
   
   on Exercise
   on Exercise
   on Vesting
   on Vesting
   
  Name  (#)   ($)(a)   (#)(b)   ($)(c)   
Mr. Mezger   0   $0    67,958   $2,926,323   
        
Mr. Cecere   0    0    10,000    448,140   
        
Mr. Hollinger   0    0    2,400    65,256   
        
Mr. Barnard   0    0    5,000    202,460   
        
Mr. Masuda   0    0    1,000    27,190   
        
Former NEO
                      
Mr. Freed   35,732    334,731    24,790    1,220,164   
        
(a)Value Realized on Exercise:  The amount reported in this column for Mr. Freed reflects our payment to him for stock options he exercised and reflects the aggregate gross dollar value corresponding to those stock options (i.e., the difference between the market price of the underlying shares at exercise and the exercise price).
(b)Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting:  The amounts reported in this column for Messrs. Mezger and Cecere reflect the vesting of restricted stock awards on January 16, 2007 and October 23, 2007. The amounts reported in this column for Messrs. Hollinger and Masuda reflect the vesting of restricted stock awards on October 23, 2007. The amounts reported in this column for Mr. Barnard reflect the vesting of restricted stock awards on March 1, 2007 and October 23, 2007. The amount reported in this column for Mr. Freed reflects the vesting of a restricted stock award on January 16, 2007. In each case, the amount reported reflects the gross number of shares of our common stock that vested. However, each NEO returned shares to us to cover applicable tax withholding obligations, resulting in the NEO holding fewer shares of our common stock than reflected in the table.
(c)Value Realized on Vesting:  The amounts reported in this column reflect the gross dollar value realized upon the vesting of each applicable award (i.e., the number of shares times the closing price of our common stock on the vesting date). However, as noted in footnote (b) to this table, each NEO returned shares of our common stock to us to cover tax withholding obligations and, therefore, actually realized a lower total value than the amount reported in this column.


42


Pension Benefits During Fiscal Year 2007
                       
       Number
   Present
   Payments
   
       of Years
   Value of
   During
   
       Credited
   Accumulated
   Last Fiscal
   
   Plan
   Service
   Benefit
   Year
   
  Name  Name   (#)(a)   ($)(b)   ($)   
Mr. Mezger   Retirement Plan    14   $6,548,847   $0   
        
Mr. Cecere   Retirement Plan    6    1,455,299    0   
        
Mr. Hollinger   Retirement Plan    20    1,400,596    0   
        
Mr. Barnard   Retirement Plan    13    1,343,291    0   
        
Former NEO
                      
Mr. Freed   Retirement Plan    13    1,455,299    0   
        
(a)Number of Years of Credited Service:  These amounts are as of the valuation date. As discussed under the heading “Retirement Programs” on pages 33-34 above, full entitlement to the Retirement Plan benefit occurs upon the completion of five years of participation. As of November 30, 2007, all the participating NEOs had five years of participation, except for Mr. Barnard who had four years of participation. Mr. Masuda is not a participant in the plan.
(b)Present Value of Accumulated Benefit:  The amounts reported in this column represent the actuarial present value of the total retirement benefit that would be payable to each respective NEO under the Retirement Plan as of November 30, 2007. The following are the key actuarial assumptions and methodology used to calculate this present value: the base benefit for each participant is assumed to begin as of the earliest possible date for each participant (generally the later of age 55 or the 10th anniversary of the commencement of participation); the base benefit is adjusted by past and future cost of living adjustments of three percent in the plan year ending November 30, 2006, 3.3% in the plan year ending November 30, 2007, and then an assumed three percent each year thereafter, until the last year benefits are paid for each participant; and the discount rate is six percent.


43


Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation During Fiscal Year 2007
                            
   Executive
   Registrant
   Aggregate
       Aggregate
   
   Contributions
   Contributions
   Earnings
   Aggregate
   Balance
   
   in Last
   in Last
   in Last
   Withdrawals/
   at Last
   
   Fiscal Year
   Fiscal Year
   Fiscal Year
   Distributions
   Fiscal Year
   
  Name  ($)(a)   ($)(b)   ($)(c)   ($)(d)   ($)(e)   
Mr. Mezger  $57,125   $43,625   $7,978   $22,678   $297,002   
                            
Mr. Hollinger   297,208    11,200    119,522    0    1,715,258   
                            
Mr. Barnard   117,350    10,825    36,407    0    391,468   
                            
Former NEO
                           
Mr. Freed   0    0    55,440    1,045,450    525,083   
                            
(a)Executive Contributions in Last Fiscal Year:  The amounts reported in this column reflect compensation the respective NEOs earned in our 2007 fiscal year that they have voluntarily deferred. These amounts are included in the “Salary,” “Bonus” or “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” columns to the “Summary Compensation Table” on page 35 above. Messrs. Cecere and Masuda have not made any deferrals.
(b)Registrant Contributions in Last Fiscal Year:  The amounts reported in this column reflect the matching contributions we made to the respective NEOs’ individual voluntary contributions to our Deferred Compensation Plan. These amounts are included in the “Summary Compensation Table.”
(c)Aggregate Earnings in Last Fiscal Year:  The amounts reported in this column do not include any above-market or preferential earnings. Accordingly, these amounts are not reported in the “Summary Compensation Table.”
(d)Aggregate Withdrawals/Distributions:  Mr. Mezger’s distribution was a short term payout at his election. The amount reported for Mr. Freed represents a distribution, for his account prior to December 31, 2004, taken in connection with the termination of his employment with us in July 2007.
(e)Aggregate Balance at Last Fiscal Year End:  The amounts reported in this column reflect compensation the NEOs earned in our 2007 fiscal year or in prior years, but which they voluntarily elected to defer receipt.
Employment Agreements and Potential Payments upon Termination of Employment or Change in Control Arrangements,
Retirement
As described further below, the CEO’s Employment Agreement and Death Benefit Planscertain of our employee benefit plans, including our equity compensation plans, provide for payments and other benefits to our NEOs on a change in control of usand/or on their termination of employment with us under certain circumstances. Some of our employee benefit plans are in the process of being modified to comply with the Internal Revenue Code Section 409A, which in certain cases requires that payments to key employees (such as our NEOs) not commence for six months following a termination of employment.
 
Certain AgreementsCEO Employment Agreement.  Under his Employment Agreement, if we terminate Mr. Mezger’s employment without “Cause” or he resigns with Mr. Karatz“Good Reason,” he is entitled to the following benefits, subject to a release of claims against us:
 On November 12, 2006, we entered into
• a lump sum cash payment equal to two times his annual salary plus average annual bonus for the prior three years, with the total payment capped at $6 million;
• a pro-rated bonus earned, if any, for the year in which Mr. Mezger’s employment terminates;
• health coverage that we pay for two years;
• with respect to equity compensation granted to him on or after February 28, 2007, (a) two years of additional service credited to compute equity vesting plus full vesting for any equity issued to him in lieu of cash


44


bonuses, and (b) 36 months to exercise any outstanding equity granted to him on or after February 28, 2007 (subject to the original term duration of each equity grant);
• performance shares (other than the performance share grant made in 2007) paid as if the performance period closed on the termination date if the performance period would otherwise close in the next 24 months; and
• payment of his performance share grant made in 2007.
Outstanding equity awards granted to Mr. Mezger before the effective date of the Employment Agreement are governed by their respective terms and conditions with respect to his termination of employment.
The following benefits are payable to Mr. Mezger in the case of a Tolling Agreement with Mr. Karatz“Change in Control”:
• full vesting of unvested equity granted to him on or after February 28, 2007, with earlier equity awards governed by their respective terms and conditions;
• performance shares paid as earned with the applicable performance period closing as of the date of the Change in Control;
• full vesting and lump sum cash payment of deferred compensation, retirement or other employee benefits;
• if his employment is involuntarily terminated in connection with a Change in Control (generally, during the period starting three months before and ending twelve months after a Change in Control), payment of the same severance as provided above, except the applicable multiple is three times his annual salary and average bonus rather than two times and the total payment is capped at $12 million. Mr. Mezger’s termination of employment for any reason during the thirteen month period following a Change in Control will be treated as an involuntary termination; and
• additionalgross-up payment to compensate for any excise taxes under Internal Revenue Code Section 280G (“Section 280G”).
“Cause” is generally defined in the Employment Agreement as a felony conviction materially harming us; willful failure to follow reasonable Board directions; material breach of the Employment Agreement; acts of fraud or dishonesty or misappropriation intended to result in personal enrichment at our expense; and willful misconduct likely to materially damage our financial position or reputation. The Employment Agreement provides Mr. Mezger with a30-day notice/cure period and gives him an opportunity to present his case to the full Board with respect to a possible for-cause termination of his employment. “Good Reason” under the Employment Agreement includes a forced relocation of more than 50 miles; any reduction in Mr. Mezger’s base pay or his annual bonus opportunity that causes these pay components to become materially uncompetitive; any material diminution of Mr. Mezger’s duties or responsibilities; our material breach of the Employment Agreement; or the failure of a successor to assume the Employment Agreement.
“Change in Control” is defined under the Employment Agreement to include reorganizations in which our controlling shareholders, if any, no longer hold a majority of our voting stock, or a sale of substantially all of our assets with substantially the same effect; a change in the majority of the Board without approval of the incumbent directors; and any transaction in which a third party becomes the beneficial owner of 35% or more of our total voting power.
Executive Severance Plan.  Under our Executive Severance Plan, no severance will be payable to a NEO or other participant if he or she voluntarily terminates employment or his or her employment is terminated by us with cause. If the employment of a NEO or other participant is involuntarily terminated by us without cause, the plan provides a cash severance payment equal to a multiple of base salary and average bonus, as discussed below.
For Messrs. Cecere and Hollinger, the severance amount is equal to two times the sum of base salary and average bonus. With respect to other participants (including our other NEOs), the severance amount is equal to one times base salary and average bonus. The severance amount is reduced by any other severance payments that a participant is entitled to receive from us.


45


If a participant is entitled to severance under the plan, the applicable base salary will be the participant’s base salary in effect at the time of the termination of his service as our Chairmanor her employment, and Chief Executive Officer. Under the Tolling Agreement, we and Mr. Karatz reserve all rights under his Employment Agreement and under any stock option, restricted stock, retirement and other benefit plans in which he was a participant. The Tolling Agreement remains in effect and no resolution has been reached asaverage bonus will be the average of the bonuses paid to the matters reserved under its terms. We have made no severance or other payments to Mr. Karatz with respect to the matters reserved. We have agreed to provide Mr. Karatz with medical and dental benefits at least equal to those he would have received if still employed by us until these reserved matters are resolved.
   Mr. Karatz was employed under an Employment Agreement that provided him with a salary (set at $1,250,000 for fiscal 2006) and annual incentive compensation ranging from 1% to 2% of our pretax, pre-incentive income depending on our return on equity for a particular fiscal year. His incentive compensation was paid 75% in cash and 25% in shares of restricted stock, although any cash compensation in excess of $5 million was also paid in shares of restricted Common Stock.
   Mr. Karatz’s Employment Agreement also provided for him to receive a nonqualified retirement benefit equal to 100% of his average base salary during the final three years of his employment, payable for 25 years. In addition, if he was involuntarily terminated without cause or if he voluntarily terminated his employment for good reason, he was entitled to a severance equal to three times the sum of his average annual base salary and incentive compensationparticipant for the three fiscal years prior to the datetermination of the terminationparticipant’s employment (or such shorter time as the participant has been employed by us). However, the average bonus amount is limited to (a) three times base salary for participants entitled to a severance of his employment.two times base salary and average bonus, and (b) two times base salary for participants entitled to a severance of one times base salary and average bonus.
 If
Participants entitled to a severance under the plan are also entitled to a continuation of health benefits that we will pay for a period of years equal to their particular severance multiple. The definition of “cause” under the plan is generally the same as the definition under our CEO’s Employment Agreement. All benefits under the plan are subject to execution of a release and covenants regarding non-solicitation, non-disparagement and confidential information.
Change in Control Severance Plan.  The CIC Plan provides specified benefits to designated participants, which are limited to our top management. All of our NEOs were participants in the CIC Plan as of the end of our 2007 fiscal year, except for Mr. Karatz retired withBarnard, who was added to the Board’s consent,CIC Plan in February 2008. Mr. KaratzMezger’s Employment Agreement limits the payments and his family wouldbenefits that he might be entitled to receive medical and dentalunder the CIC Plan. Accordingly, he is entitled only to CIC Plan benefits for Mr. Karatz’s lifetime at least equal to those which would have beenthat do not duplicate benefits provided under our plans, unlesshis Employment Agreement in a change in control of us, and the total severance payment benefit that he became re-employedmay be entitled to under the CIC Plan is capped at $12 million.
A participant in the CIC Plan is either a Group A or a Group B Participant. Messrs. Mezger, Cecere, Hollinger, and was eligibleBarnard are Group A Participants, and Mr. Masuda and other senior executives are Group B Participants. If a change in control of us occurs, a Group A Participant is entitled to receive comparablethe following benefits, from another employer. We would also be obligatedsubject to provide Mr. Karatz with, or reimburse Mr. Karatzexecution of a standard release, if the expenses for, an appropriate office and administrative support commensurate with his former status as our Chief Executive Officer.
   In the event Mr. Karatz’s termination of service was by usparticipant’s employment is terminated other than for cause or if it was by him withoutdisability, or the participant terminates his or her employment for good reason, allreason:
• a severance benefit equal to two times the sum of the participant’s average base salary and average actual annual cash bonus for the three fiscal years prior to the year in which the change in control occurs;
• accelerated vesting of any options and the lapse of any restricted period with respect to any restricted stock or other equity awards awarded to the participant;
• full vesting in any benefits under our Death Benefit Only Plan (which is described on the next page) if the participant also participates in that plan; and
• an additionalgross-up payment to compensate for any Section 280G excise taxes imposed on payments under the CIC Plan or on payments under any other plan.
A Group B Participant is entitled to the same benefits as a Group A Participant, except that the severance payment is equal to one times the sum of his unearned rightsthe participant’s average base salary and average actual annual bonus and no Section 280Ggross-up payment is payable.
A “change in control” is generally defined under the Employment Agreement terminate. The Tolling Agreement mentioned above providesCIC Plan to include any change in control that neither party has made an admission aswould be required to be reported to the characterizationSecurities and Exchange Commission on an Annual Report onForm 10-K, the replacement of Mr. Karatz’s terminationa majority of service, including whetherthe Board by individuals whose election or nomination was not approved by three-quarters of the incumbent directors, and a person’s acquiring 15% or more of our combined voting power unless such termination constitutedacquisition was approved by a “retirement”majority of the incumbent Board.
The CIC Plan defines “cause” to include (a) acts of fraud or other formmisappropriation intended to result in substantial personal enrichment at our expense and (b) willful and deliberate violations of termination.
   Mr. Karatz’s termination of service does not affect any advancement of fees or indemnificationthe participant’s obligations to us which heresult in material injury to us. “Good reason” is otherwise entitleddefined under applicable state law, our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws, and any agreement with us. Mr. Karatz is a named insured under our D&O insurance policies and we agreedthe CIC Plan to include materially inconsistent changes in the Tolling Agreementparticipant’s duties and responsibilities as they were prior to use our best effortsthe change in control; any reduction in the participant’s salary or aggregate incentive compensation opportunities; any required relocation of more than 50 miles; a material increase in the participant’s business travel obligations; or a successor’s failure to ensure that he would be covered under any renewals or replacements of those policies.assume the CIC Plan.


46

42


Other Change in Control Arrangementsand Employment Termination Provisions.  The individual award agreements governing outstanding unvested stock options and SARs provide for accelerated vesting upon a change of control and upon retirement, as defined under the agreements. The individual award agreements governing outstanding restricted stock awards and phantom shares provide for accelerated vesting upon a change of control, as defined under the agreements. The provisions governing the payment of performance shares granted to our CEO are described under the heading “CEO Employment Agreement” onpages 44-45 above.
 We
In addition, different provisions govern the length of time a participant has to exercise a stock option or SAR after termination of his or her employment, depending upon the reason for termination and the particular agreement. For example, in the case of a termination of employment for cause, the time to exercise may be limited to five days. In the case of a termination of employment for retirement, the participant may have until the end of a Change in Control Planstock option’s or SAR’s original term in which 13 senior executives currently participate, including Messrs. Mezger, Cecere,to exercise.
Recipients of performance units under the UPP may be entitled to certain cash awards based on our performance over the three-year performance period ending November 30, 2008. In the event of a change in control (as defined under the UPP), these awards are immediately paid out at target. In the event of retirement, death, or permanent disability (as defined under the UPP), these awards also vest and Hollinger. The planare paid out at target, except that the maximum award is designedpro-rated to encouragereflect the retentionnumber of senior executivesmonths a recipient worked during the three-year performance period.
Our Deferred Compensation Plan and Retirement Plan provide for full vesting of benefits for participants in the event of a change in control.control, as that term is defined under the plans. The planRetirement Plan further provides that, if there isan advance election has been made, a change in control, as defined inparticipant may immediately receive the plan, and a participating executive is terminated within aactuarial value (as specified period after such change, other than for cause or disability, or ifunder the executive voluntarily terminatesplan) of his or her employment for good reason, the terminated executive will be entitledvested plan benefits.
Our Death Benefit Only Plan (in which Messrs. Mezger, Cecere, and Hollinger participate) provides a death benefit to receivea participant’s designated beneficiary of $500,000 or $1 million (plus an additional gross-up amount equalsufficient to one or two years’ average salary and cash incentive bonus, dependingpay taxes on the executive.
   Under the KB Home 1988 Employee Stock Plan, the KB Home Performance-Based Incentive Plan for Senior Management, the KB Home 1998 Stock Incentive Plan, the KB Home 2001 Stock Incentive Planbenefit and the Amended and Restated KB Home 1999 Incentive Plan, all outstanding stock options will become fully exercisable and all restrictions on outstanding shares of restricted Common Stock or other awards shall lapse upon a “change of ownership.” A “change of ownership” will be deemed to occur if: (1) current members of the Board of Directors or other directors elected by three-quarters of the current members or their respective replacements (excluding certain individuals who took office in connection with an acquisition of 20% or more of our voting securities or in connection with an election contest) cease to represent a majority of the Board; or (2) the Board determines that a change of ownership has occurred.
   The KB Home Unit Performance Program, which is administered under our employee equity compensation plans, provides that upon a change of ownership, as defined in the program documents, each outstanding Performance Unit will be paid in cash at the target level.
   The KB Home Non-Employee Directors Stock Plan provides that upon a change in control, as defined in the plan, all Stock Units will be paid in cash or shares of Common Stock, in accordance with the prior election made by each participating Director. The KB Home Directors’ Legacy Program provides that upon a change of ownership, as defined in the program documents, all participating Directors shall become immediately vested under the program, and we shall create an irrevocable trust into which we shall transfer sufficient assets (including the Directors’ life insurance policies) to make the designated charitable contributions for the participating Directors.
   We also maintain a non-qualified Executive Deferred Compensation Plan. From 1985 to 1992, pursuant to the plan, certain executives deferred receipt of a certain amount of pretax income, plus a Company matching contribution, until retirement, termination or certain other events, including a change in control. No new contributions to the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan may be made, but we continue to pay interest on prior contributions still held in the plan.
   Under the KB Home Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan, implemented in 2001, in the event of a change of control, as defined in the plan, participating executives, including Messrs. Mezger, Freed and Hollinger, become immediately vested in matching and other contributions we may make to their respective accounts under the plan unless we determine that payment of any part of such vested amounts would not be deductible under federal income tax rules. During his service as our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Karatz participated in the plan.
   Under the KB Home Retirement Plan, which is described in more detail below under the heading

43


“Retirement Plan”, participants become fully vested in their Retirement Plan benefits, and may elect a lump sum distribution of Retirement Plan benefits, inadditional amount). In the event of a change in control, as defined in the plan.
   We also maintainplan, the KB Home Death Benefit Only Plan (the “DBO Plan”), which is described in more detail below underplan provides for (a) distribution of an insurance contract to a participant sufficient to pay the heading “Death Benefit Only Plan.” Participants become fully vested in their DBO Plan benefitsdeath benefit (if the participant dies any time before age 100) and as described more fully below, will receive a(b) an additional gross-up amount sufficient to pay taxes caused by the distribution of the insurance policy on theircontract and the additional amount.
We also maintain term life in cash ininsurance policies for certain NEOs as follows: Mr. Mezger $400,000, Mr. Barnard $750,000, and Masuda $750,000.
The following tables illustrate payments we may be required to make under various employment termination andchange-in-control scenarios. The tables assume that the eventemployment termination orchange-in-control occurred November 30, 2007, at which time the closing price of a change in control, as defined in the plan.
Retirement Plan
   We adopted the KB Home Retirement Plan in 2002. The Retirement Plan provides certain supplemental retirement benefits to selected executives. Currently, 27 executives, including Messrs. Mezger, Cecere, Freed and Hollinger, participate in the Retirement Plan. During his service as our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Karatz participated in the plan. We establish an “annual benefit amount” for each participant in the Retirement Plan. A participant becomes entitled to benefits under the Retirement Plan only if the participant releases us from any and all claims that he or she may then have against us and only if the participant’s termination of employment with us occurs either (1) on or after the fifth anniversary of the date the participant commenced participation in the Retirement Plan, or (2) before that date, due to the participant’s death or disability. A participant is eligible for a reduced level of benefits if we terminate the participant’s employment without cause after the fourth, but before the fifth, anniversary of the date the participant commenced participation in the Retirement Plan.
   If a participant becomes entitled to Retirement Plan benefits, we will pay the participant a series of installment payments over a period of 20 years commencing following the later of (1) the participant’s attainment of age 55, (2) the tenth anniversary of the date the participant commenced participation in the Retirement Plan or (3) the termination of the participant’s employment with us. The annual benefit to be paid to a participant who is entitled to Retirement Plan benefits (to be paid each year over the twenty-year payment period) equals the “annual benefit amount” we determine for that participant. In February 2006, the Management Development and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors approved the incorporation of acost-of-living adjustment (“COLA”) to the base benefit amounts. The 2006 COLAcommon stock was 3%. The rate of COLA adjustment will be reviewed by the Management Development and Compensation Committee annually. Messrs. Mezger, Freed, Cecere and Hollinger commenced participation in the Retirement Plan as of July 11, 2002 and their annual benefit amounts upon retirement are $463,000, $103,000, $103,000 and $103,000, respectively. We may elect to pay a participant the actuarial equivalent of his or her benefits in a lump sum payment as opposed to installments over twenty years. At the time of Mr. Karatz’s termination of service, his annual benefit amount under the Retirement Plan was $824,000. However, Mr. Karatz’s rights to this amount are reserved under the Tolling Agreement described on page 42 above. Mr. Karatz’s participation in the Retirement Plan commenced as of July 11, 2002.$20.89.
Death Benefit Only Plan


47

   In 2001, we implemented the DBO Plan. The Plan currently covers 52 executives. The beneficiary of a DBO Plan participant is entitled to benefits if the participant either (1) dies while actively employed by us or an affiliate or (2) dies after completing 10 years of service with us or an affiliate, including at least 5 consecutive years of

44


service while a DBO Plan participant. Each participant is provided a net after-tax benefit from $500,000 to $1 million. The net after-tax death benefit of each of Messrs. Karatz, Mezger, Freed, Cecere and Hollinger is $1 million.
   We have purchased life insurance policies on the lives of the participants in the DBO Plan. In the event of a change in control, we will pay to the insurance company, on behalf of each participant, an amount large enough so that, after the payment, the policy is “fully paid up.” For this purpose, the term “fully paid up” means that, after the payment described in the preceding sentence is paid as a premium to the insurer, the value of the policy is such that the policy is projected (based on assumptions set forth in the DBO Plan) to be able to pay at least the basic benefit applicable to the participant if the participant dies at any time after the change in control and prior to age 100. The policy will then be transferred to the participant along with a cash payment large enough to pay any federal, state or local income or payroll taxes (including excise taxes, such as the excise tax under Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code, if applicable) attributable to the distribution of the policy and the cash payment.
   As of October 2004, new eligible executives are provided with a $750,000 death benefit under our group term life insurance policy instead of participating in the DBO Plan. Mr. Masuda has been provided with this $750,000 death benefit.

45


Executive CompensationPost-Employment Payments — Mr. Mezger
                                      
  Executive
          Involuntary
       Change in
           
  Payments and
          Termination
       Control With
           
  Benefits upon
          Without Cause/
   Change in
   Termination
           
  Termination
      Involuntary
   Termination
   Control
   for Good
           
  or Change
  Voluntary
   Termination
   for Good
   Without
   Reason or
           
  in Control  Termination   for Cause   Reason   Termination   Without Cause   Death   Disability   
Compensation
                                     
                                      
Severance  $0   $0   $6,000,000 (a)  $0   $12,000,000(b)  $0   $0   
                                      
Long-term Incentives                                     
                                      
Cash LTI Awards (c)                                     
                                      
- UPP - 10   97,500    97,500    97,500    750,000    750,000    750,000    750,000   
                                      
- UPP - 11   0    0    0    1,000,000    1,000,000    666,667    666,667   
                                      
Acceleration of Unvested Equity (d)                                     
                                      
- Restricted Stock   0    0    0    3,269,139    3,269,139    0    0   
                                      
- Performance Shares   0    0    1,552,168(e)   1,552,168 (e)   1,552,168 (e)   0    0   
                                      
- Phantom Shares   0    0    1,182,097    1,182,097    1,182,097    0    0   
                                      
Vested Equity (d)                                     
                                      
- Stock Options   3,553,714    3,553,714    3,553,714    3,553,714    3,553,714    3,553,714    3,553,714   
                                      
Benefits & Perquisites
                                     
                                      
Retirement Plan   6,548,847 (f)   6,548,847 (f)   6,548,847 (f)   7,535,751 (g)   7,535,751 (g)   6,548,847 (f)   6,548,847 (f)  
                                      
Vested Deferred Compensation   297,002 (h)   297,002 (h)   297,002 (h)   0    297,002 (h)   297,002 (h)   297,002 (h)  
                                      
Death Benefit Only Plan   0    0    0    903,305 (i)   903,305 (i)   1,724,404 (j)   0   
                                      
Term Life Insurance   0    0    0    0    0    400,000    0   
                               ��      
Outplacement   0    0    20,000 (k)   0    0    0    0   
                                      
Health Benefits   0    0    50,869 (l)   0    50,869 (l)   0    0   
                                      
Credited Vacation Benefits (m)   76,923    76,923    76,923    0    76,923    76,923    76,923   
                                      
Total
  $10,573,986   $10,573,986   $19,379,120   $19,746,174   $32,170,968   $14,017,557   $11,893,153   
                                      
Summary Compensation Table
 The following Summary Compensation Table sets forth the total compensation earned by each of the Named Executive Officers for the fiscal years ended November 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004.
                                  
          Long-Term Compensation  
             
      Awards Payouts  
    Annual Compensation    
        Securities    
      Other Annual Restricted Underlying LTIP All Other
  Fiscal   Bonus Compensation Stock Options/ Payouts Compensation
Name and Position Year Salary($) ($)(a) ($)(b) Awards($)(a) SARs(#) ($)(c) ($)(d)
 
Jeffrey T. Mezger                                
 President and Chief  2006  $568,750  $2,500,000  $80,357  $2,000,000     $746,250  $15,700 
 Executive Officer  2005   498,333   2,500,000      7,212,531   75,000   2,519,442   29,900 
    2004   478,333   2,000,000      3,524,962   200,000   2,761,071   28,800 
 
Robert Freed                                
 Senior Vice President,  2006   389,167   2,000,000   50,716   1,233,359      375,000   10,850 
 Investment Strategy  2005   266,667   1,250,000      1,772,264   8,000   1,007,808   16,175 
    2004   229,167   1,250,000      1,107,985   25,000   1,380,426   13,800 
 
Domenico Cecere                                
 Executive Vice  2006   548,333   750,000      570,000      525,000   13,200 
 President and Chief  2005   529,167   750,000      576,731   6,000   1,763,585   12,600 
 Financial Officer  2004   518,333   750,000      236,500   20,000   1,932,728   11,700 
 
William R. Hollinger                                
 Senior Vice President  2006   312,633   750,000      37,500      375,000   18,571 
 and Chief Accounting  2005   285,683   716,500      160,700   6,000   1,007,808   16,844 
 Officer  2004   274,717   750,000      91,800   24,000   1,104,494   16,536 
 
Kelly Masuda                                
 Senior Vice President  2006   287,604   625,000            37,500   9,384 
 and Treasurer  2005   273,646   412,500      128,560   5,000      688 
    2004   258,021   258,750      38,250   20,000      8,409 
 
Bruce Karatz                                
 Former Chairman  2006   1,185,417      629,089            103,975 
 and Chief  2005   1,091,667   5,000,000   296,077   27,913,496   250,000   3,527,250   102,401 
 Executive Officer  2004   1,000,000   5,000,000   165,263   14,045,340   560,000   3,865,455   101,528 
 
(a)The Bonus reportedSeverance based on a multiple of two times current annual base salary plus average bonus earned for fiscal years ending November 30, 2006, November 30, 2005 and November 30, 2004, with benefit capped at $6,000,000, as annual compensation for each of Messrs. Mezger, Freed, Cecere, Hollinger and Masuda in the 2006 fiscal year is the cash portion of their respective annual incentive bonuses. The Restricted Stock Award dollar amounts reported for each of Messrs. Mezger, Freed, Cecere and Hollinger in the 2006 fiscal year reflect the amount of their annual incentive awards over the cash limits established for them. The number of shares of restricted stock has not yet been determined due to the review of our stock option grant practices in the 2006 fiscal year. When granted, the number of shares of restricted stock will be determinedprovided by reference to the closing price of our Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the date of grant.Mr. Mezger’s Employment Agreement.

46


(b)The Named Executive Officers receive certain personal benefits, including financial planningSeverance based on a multiple of three times current annual base salary plus average bonus earned for fiscal years ending November 30, 2006, November 30, 2005 and tax preparation services, an automobile and gasoline allowance and automobile insurance reimbursement. However, in accordanceNovember 30, 2004, with Securities and Exchange Commission rules, personal benefits for each Named Executive Officer in the 2006 fiscal year totaling less than $50,000 in aggregate incremental cost to us have been omitted, exceptbenefit capped at $12,000,000, as discussed in this footnote. The amount reported for Mr. Mezger for our 2006 fiscal year includes financial planning and tax preparation services and an automobile and gasoline allowance. It also includes $62,255, representing an allocated portion of overall flight costs attributable to his spouse’s joining him on business trips he took using Company-owned aircraft. We encouraged his spouse to join him on the trips, these trips were not personal, and we did not incur any incremental cost to haveprovided by Mr. Mezger’s spouse join him on such trips. The amount reported for Mr. Freed includes an automobile allowance and $38,716 related to his spouse’s joining him on business trips Mr. Freed took on Company-owned aircraft. The amount reported for Mr. Karatz for the 2006 fiscal year includes financial planning and tax preparation services, an automobile and gasoline allowance, tickets to sporting events, personal gifts, personal meal and lodging expenses and club membership fees. It also includes $558,009 related to his personal use of Company-owned aircraft.Employment Agreement.
 
(c)PayoutsAssumes awards paid at target performance levels for our 2006a change in control. For death and 2005disability, amounts reflect a pro-rated target payment based on the number of months the award is outstanding.“UPP-10” represents UPP performance units granted for the fiscal years to all participants under our long-term incentive program,2005-2007 performance period, which ended on November 30, 2007.“UPP-11” represents UPP performance units granted for the Unit Performance Program, were paid in cash.fiscal 2006-2008 performance period, which ends on November 30, 2008.
 
(d)These amounts represent our aggregate contributions to our 401(k) Savings Plan, Supplemental Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan andEquity awards valued using closing price of $20.89 as of November 30, 2007. Phantom share values include accrued dividends on awards.
(e)Assumes payout of 133.60% of target award plus reinvested dividends in accordance with the amount of interest earned ontotal stockholder return calculation specified in the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan at a rate in excess of 120% ofaward agreement for the applicable federal rate. In the 2006 fiscal year, the Named Executive Officers accrued the following respective amounts under such plans: Mr. Mezger $13,200, $2,500 and $0; Mr. Freed $9,500, $1,350 and $0; Mr. Cecere $13,200, $0 and $0; Mr. Hollinger $13,200, $5,371 and $0; Mr. Masuda $9,384, $0 and $0; and Mr. Karatz $13,200, $57,925 and $32,850.performance shares.
Option/SAR Grants in Last Fiscal Year


48

   There were no grants of stock options or stock appreciation rights made to any of our Named Executive Officers during our 2006 fiscal year.

47


(f)Reflects present values of accrued benefit as of November 30, 2007 using an annual discount rate of six percent (consistent with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 87,Employers’ Accounting for Pensions(“SFAS 87”) valuations). Benefits are assumed to commence at earliest benefit commencement date.
(g)Assumes lump sum payout of accrued benefit on a change in control using a 4.89% Applicable Federal Rate (“AFR”) discount rate as provided in the plan.
(h)Deferred compensation balances include deferrals and earnings of Mr. Mezger’s base salary in the amount of $141,774.
(i)Values are estimated based on cash surrender values of life insurance policies as of January 28, 2008 of $429,845 plus expected payments to fund policies to maturity of $77,406 and income taxgross-ups of $396,054.
(j)Mr. Mezger’s beneficiaries would be entitled to receive an estimated death benefit of $1,724,404 ($1,000,000 plus$724,404 gross-up for income taxes) upon his death. The present value of the benefit as of November 30, 2007 is estimated as $444,156 using a six percent discount factor and the Group Annuity Mortality (“GAM”) 83 (male) tables for life expectancy (consistent with rates and mortality tables used for Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 106,Employers’ Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions (“SFAS 106”) valuations).
(k)This benefit is not available if Mr. Mezger terminates his employment with us for good reason.
(l)Assumes payment by us of 24 months of medical, dental and vision benefits using current COBRA rates of $2,120 per month.
(m)Assumes payout of 160 hours of vacation benefits. This benefit is described under the heading “Benefits” on pages 32-33 above.


49


Aggregated Option/SAR Exercises in Last Fiscal Year and Fiscal Year End Option/SAR ValuePost-Employment Payments — Mr. Cecere
                         
 
  Number of Unexercised Value of Unexercised
  Options Held at Fiscal In-the-Money Options at
  Shares   Year End(#) Fiscal Year End($)(a)
  Acquired on Value    
Name Exercise(#) Realized($)(a) Exercisable Unexercisable Exercisable Unexercisable
 
Jeffrey T. Mezger    $   1,428,940   116,666  $41,255,895  $895,991 
Robert Freed        55,066   13,666   1,039,756   111,996 
Domenico Cecere        240,134   10,666   6,072,893   89,591 
William R. Hollinger        164,058   12,000   4,017,253   107,520 
Kelly Masuda        35,001   9,999   593,609   89,591 
Bruce Karatz(b)        2,658,120   353,332   73,174,491   2,508,791 
 
                                      
  Executive
          Involuntary
       Change in
           
  Payments and
          Termination
       Control With
           
  Benefits upon
          Without Cause/
   Change in
   Termination
           
  Termination
      Involuntary
   Termination
   Control
   for Good
           
  or Change
  Voluntary
   Termination
   for Good
   Without
   Reason or
           
  in Control  Termination   for Cause   Reason   Termination   Without Cause   Death   Disability   
Compensation
                                     
                                      
Severance  $0   $0   $3,464,000 (a)  $0   $3,327,889 (b)  $0   $0   
                                      
Long-term Incentives                                     
                                      
Cash LTI Awards (c)                                     
                                      
- UPP - 10   38,500    38,500    38,500    350,000    350,000    350,000    350,000   
                                      
- UPP - 11   0    0    0    300,000    300,000    200,000    200,000   
                                      
Acceleration of Unvested Equity (d)                                     
                                      
- Restricted Stock   0    0    0    222,792    222,792    0    0   
                                      
- Phantom Shares   0    0    0    543,798    543,798    0    0   
                                      
Benefits & Perquisites
                                     
                                      
Retirement Plan   1,455,299 (e)   1,455,299 (e)   1,455,299 (e)   1,674,611 (f)   1,674,611 (f)   1,455,299 (e)   1,455,299 (e)  
                                      
Death Benefit Only Plan   0    0    0    1,303,002 (g)   1,303,002 (g)   1,724,404 (h)   0   
                                      
Outplacement   0    0    20,000    0    0    0    0   
                                      
Health Benefits   0    0    37,536 (i)   0    0    0    0   
                                      
Credited Vacation Benefits (j)   46,154    46,154    46,154    0    46,154    46,154    46,154   
                                      
Total
  $1,539,953   $1,539,953   $5,061,489   $4,394,203   $7,768,246   $3,775,857   $2,051,453   
                                      
(a)Represents the difference between the $51.69 closing priceSeverance based on a multiple of our Common Stock ontwo times current annual base salary plus average bonus paid (including bonuses paid in equity) for fiscal years ending November 30, 2006, onNovember 30, 2005 and November 30, 2004, as provided by the New York Stock Exchange and the exercise price of the options.Executive Severance Plan.
 
(b)Pursuant toSeverance based on a Tolling Agreement between usmultiple of two times average annual base salary plus average bonus paid (including bonuses paid in equity) for fiscal years ending November 30, 2006, November 30, 2005 and Mr. Karatz,November 30, 2004, as described on page 42 above, both parties have reserved all rights under Mr. Karatz’s Employment Agreementprovided by the CIC Plan.
(c)Assumes awards paid at target performance levels for a change in control. For death and under our stock option, restricted stock, retirement or other benefit plans to which Mr. Karatz wasdisability, amounts reflect a party or was subject. As of the date of this Proxy Statement, the Tolling Agreement remains in effect and no resolution has been reached as to the matters reserved under its terms. Accordingly, no agreement or determination has been madepro-rated target payment based on the nature and extentnumber of Mr. Karatz’s rightsmonths the award is outstanding.
(d)Equity awards valued using closing price of $20.89 as of November 30, 2007. Phantom share values include accrued dividends on awards.
(e)Reflects present values of accrued benefit as of November 30, 2007 using an annual discount rate of six percent (consistent with SFAS 87 valuations). Benefits are assumed to commence at earliest benefit commencement date.
(f)Assumes lump sum payout of accrued benefit paid upon a change in control using a 4.89% AFR discount rate as provided in the outstanding stock options granted to him. We have made no severance or otherplan.
(g)Values are estimated based on cash surrender values of life insurance policies as of January 28, 2008 of $498,169 plus expected payments to fund policies to maturity of $233,532 and income taxgross-ups of $571,301.
(h)Mr. Karatz with respectCecere’s designated beneficiaries would be entitled to receive an estimated death benefit of $1,724,404 ($1,000,000 benefit plus$724,404 gross-up for income taxes).
(i)Assumes monthly contributions by us for medical, dental and vision benefits in the matters reserved. In addition, pursuant to a Stipulation and Order Preserving the Status Quo entered in January 2007 in a shareholder derivative litigation matter pending in California state court, Mr. Karatz may not exercise anyamount of his stock options, vested or unvested, at any price, until March 31, 2007. However, the expiration or earlier termination$1,564 per month for 24 months.
(j)Assumes payout of the Stipulation and Order will not entitle Mr. Karatz to exercise any160 hours of his stock options, as any such exercise will remain subject to resolution of the matters reservedvacation benefits. This benefit is described under the Tolling Agreement.heading “Benefits” on pages 32-33 above.


50

48


Long-Term Incentive Plans – Awards in Last Fiscal YearPost-Employment Payments — Mr. Hollinger
 The following table provides information on long-term incentive awards granted in the 2006 fiscal year to the Named Executive Officers under the Unit Performance Program. Please also see the “Management Development and Compensation Committee Report on Executive Compensation” on pages 37-40 above for more information on the Unit Performance Program. Pursuant to a Tolling Agreement between us and Mr. Karatz, as described on page 42 above, Mr. Karatz’s eligibility for any payout on performance units granted to him during his service as our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer is reserved and no determination or agreement regarding such eligibility has been reached.
                     
 
  Estimated Future Payout
  in Shares of Common Stock
  Number of    
  Performance Performance Threshold Target Maximum
Name Units(#)(a) Period ($)(b) ($) ($)
 
Jeffrey T. Mezger  1,000   12/1/05 – 11/30/08  $500,000  $1,000,000  $2,000,000 
Robert Freed  325   12/1/05 – 11/30/08   162,500   325,000   650,000 
Domenico Cecere  300   12/1/05 – 11/30/08   150,000   300,000   600,000 
William R. Hollinger  300   12/1/05 – 11/30/08   150,000   300,000   600,000 
Kelly Masuda  100   12/1/05 – 11/30/08   50,000   100,000   200,000 
 
                                      
           Involuntary
       Change in
           
  Executive Payments
          Termination
       Control With
           
  and Benefits
          Without Cause/
   Change in
   Termination
           
  upon Termination
      Involuntary
   Termination
   Control
   for Good
           
  or Change
  Voluntary
   Termination
   for Good
   Without
   Reason or
           
  in Control  Termination   for Cause   Reason   Termination   Without Cause   Death   Disability   
Compensation
                                     
                                      
Severance  $0   $0   $2,202,667 (a)  $0   $2,084,689 (b)  $0   $0   
                                      
Long-term Incentives                                     
                                      
Cash LTI Awards (c)                                     
                                      
- UPP - 10   33,000    33,000    33,000    300,000    300,000    300,000    300,000   
                                      
- UPP - 11   0    0    0    300,000    300,000    200,000    200,000   
                                      
Acceleration of Unvested Equity (d)                                     
                                      
- Restricted Stock   0    0    0    52,225    52,225    0    0   
                                      
- Phantom Shares   0    0    0    425,216    425,216    0    0   
                                      
Benefits & Perquisites
                                     
                                      
Retirement Plan   1,400,596 (e)   1,400,596 (e)   1,400,596 (e)   1,622,859 (f)   1,622,859 (f)   1,400,596 (e)   1,400,596 (e)  
                                      
Vested Deferred Compensation   1,715,258 (g)   1,715,258 (g)   1,715,258 (g)   0    1,715,258 (g)   1,715,258 (g)   1,715,258 (g)  
                                      
Death Benefit Only Plan   0    0    0    822,829 (h)   822,829 (h)   1,724,404 (i)   0   
                                      
Outplacement   0    0    20,000    0    0    0    0   
                                      
Health Benefits   0    0    22,056 (j)   0    0    0    0   
                                      
Total
  $3,148,854   $3,148,854   $5,393,577   $3,523,129   $7,323,076   $5,340,258   $3,615,854   
                                      
(a)AtSeverance based on a multiple of two times current annual base salary plus average bonus paid (including bonuses paid in equity) for fiscal years ending November 30, 2006, November 30, 2005 and November 30, 2004, as provided by the beginning of our 2006 fiscal year, we awarded Performance Units under the Unit Performance Program for the fiscal 2006-2008 performance period. Each Performance Unit represents the opportunity to receive an award payable in cash or in shares of our Common Stock. The dollar value or actual number of shares awarded at the end of the performance period will depend upon our cumulative earnings per share, or EPS, and average pretax return on investment, or PROI, during the performance period. The target dollar value or number of shares will be awarded if a specified, targeted cumulative EPS and average PROI are achieved for the period. The threshold dollar value or number of shares, equal to 50% of the target number, will be awarded if a specified minimum cumulative EPS and average PROI are achieved for the period. Achievement of either the specified minimum cumulative EPS or average PROI, but not both, would result in a smaller payout than the threshold dollar value or number of shares. The maximum dollar value or number of shares, equal to 200% of the target number, will be awarded if the specified maximum cumulative EPS and average PROI for the period are achieved or exceeded. If paid out in shares, the number of shares awarded at the end of the performance period will depend on the market value of our Common Stock at that time.Executive Severance Plan.
 
(b)NoSeverance based on a multiple of two times average annual base salary plus average bonus paid (including bonuses paid in equity) for fiscal years ending November 30, 2006, November 30, 2005 and November 30, 2004, as provided by the CIC Plan.
(c)Assumes awards paid at target performance levels for a change in control. For death and disability, amounts reflect a pro-rated target payment based on the number of months the award willis outstanding.
(d)Equity awards valued using closing price of $20.89 as of November 30, 2007. Phantom share values include accrued dividends on awards.
(e)Reflects present values of accrued benefit as of November 30, 2007 using an annual discount rate of six percent (consistent with SFAS 87 valuations). Benefits are assumed to commence at earliest benefit commencement date.
(f)Assumes lump sum payout of accrued benefit paid upon a change in control using a 4.89% AFR discount rate as provided in the plan.
(g)Deferred compensation balances include deferrals and earnings of Mr. Hollinger’s base salary and bonus in the amount of $1,413,221.
(h)Values are estimated based on cash surrender values of life insurance policies as of January 28, 2008 of $404,479 plus expected payments to fund policies to maturity of $57,580 and income taxgross-ups of $360,770.
(i)Mr. Hollinger’s designated beneficiaries would be madeentitled to receive an estimated death benefit of $1,724,404 ($1,000,000 benefit plus$724,404 gross-up for income taxes) upon his death. The present value of the vestingbenefits as of November 30, 2007 is approximated as $388,050 using a Performance Unit if neithersix percent discount rate and the specified minimum cumulative EPS norGAM 83 (male) tables for life expectancy (consistent with rates and mortality tables used for SFAS 106 valuations).
(j)Assumes monthly contributions by us for medical, dental and vision benefits in the specified minimum average PROI is achievedamount of $919 per month for the 2006-2008 performance period.24 months.


51

49


Equity Compensation Plan InformationPost-Employment Payments — Mr. Barnard
 The following table provides information as of November 30, 2006 with respect to shares of our Common Stock that may be issued under our existing compensation plans:
             
      Number of Common
  Number of   Shares Remaining
  Common Shares   Available for Future
  to be Issued   Issuance Under Equity
  Upon Exercise of Weighted-average Compensation Plans
  Outstanding Exercise Price of (excluding common
  Options, Warrants Outstanding Options, shares reflected in
  and Rights Warrants and Rights column (a))
  (a) (b) (c)
 
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders  7,982,877  $28.45   3,906,459 
Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders(1)  371,399   34.23   566,061 
 
Total  8,354,276  $28.71   4,472,520 
 
                                      
  Executive
          Involuntary
       Change in
           
  Payments and
          Termination
       Control With
           
  Benefits upon
          Without Cause/
       Termination
           
  Termination
      Involuntary
   Termination
   Change in
   for Good
           
  or Change
  Voluntary
   Termination
   for Good
   Control Without
   Reason or
           
  in Control  Termination   for Cause   Reason   Termination   Without Cause   Death   Disability   
Compensation
                                     
                                      
Severance  $0   $0   $870,000 (a)  $0   $2,750,022 (b)  $0   $0   
                                      
Long-term Incentives                                     
                                      
Cash LTI Awards (c)                                     
                                      
- UPP - 10   0    0    0    300,000    300,000    300,000    300,000   
                                      
- UPP - 11   0    0    0    325,000    325,000    216,667    216,667   
                                      
Acceleration of Unvested Equity (d)                                     
                                      
- Restricted Stock   0    0    0    41,780    41,780    0    0   
                                      
- Phantom Shares   0    0    0    373,474    373,474    0    0   
                                      
Benefits & Perquisites
                                     
                                      
Retirement Plan   0    0    0    1,343,291 (e)   1,343,291 (e)   0    0   
                                      
Vested Deferred Compensation   391,468 (f)   391,468 (f)   391,468 (f)   0    391,468 (f)   391,468 (f)   391,468 (f)  
                                      
Term Life Insurance   0    0    0    0    0    750,000    0   
                                      
Outplacement   0    0    20,000    0    0    0    0   
                                      
Health Benefits   0    0    16,704 (g)   0    0    0    0   
                                      
280G TaxGross-up
   N/A    N/A    N/A    0    1,404,543 (h)   N/A    N/A   
                                      
Total
  $391,468   $391,468   $1,298,172   $2,383,545   $6,929,578   $1,658,135   $908,135   
                                      
(1)(a)RepresentsSeverance based on a multiple of one times current annual base salary plus average bonus paid (including bonuses paid in equity) for fiscal years ending November 30, 2006, November 30, 2005 and November 30, 2004, as provided by the Non-Employee Directors StockExecutive Severance Plan. The Non-Employee Directors Stock Plan is described aboveMr. Barnard’s average bonus has been capped under the heading “Director Compensation”terms of the plan at $580,000, which is two times his annual base salary.
(b)Severance based on pages 11-12.a multiple of two times average annual base salary plus average bonus paid (including bonuses paid in equity) for fiscal years ending November 30, 2006, November 30, 2005 and November 30, 2004, as provided by the CIC Plan.
(c)Assumes awards paid at target performance levels for a change in control. For death and disability, amounts reflect a pro-rated target payment based on the number of months the award is outstanding.
(d)Equity awards valued using closing price of $20.89 as of November 30, 2007. Phantom share values include accrued dividends on awards.
(e)Reflects present values of accrued benefit as of November 30, 2007 using an annual discount rate of six percent (consistent with SFAS 87 valuations). Benefits are assumed to commence at earliest benefit commencement date. Mr. Barnard has not elected a lump sum payout upon the a change in control.
(f)Deferred compensation balances include deferrals and earnings of Mr. Barnard’s base salary and bonus in the amount of $376,004.
(g)Assumes monthly contributions by us for medical, dental and vision benefits in the amount of $1,392 per month for twelve months.
(h)Under the CIC Plan, if payments are subject to excise taxes under IRC Section 4999, we will pay Mr. Barnard an additional“gross-up” amount so that his after-tax benefits are the same as though no excise tax had been applied. The following major assumptions were used: (a) stock options assumed cashed out based upon assumed value of $20.89 less option exercise price, and other equity awards were valued assuming a fair market value of $20.89; and (b) payments for accelerated vesting of time based equity and Retirement Plan payouts valued using Treas. Reg.Section 1.280G-1 Q&A 24(c).


52

50


Post-Employment Payments — Mr. Masuda
                                      
  Executive
          Involuntary
       Change in
           
  Payments and
          Termination
       Control With
           
  Benefits upon
          Without Cause/
   Change in
   Termination
           
  Termination
      Involuntary
   Termination
   Control
   for Good
           
  or Change
  Voluntary
   Termination
   for Good
   Without
   Reason or
           
  in Control  Termination   for Cause   Reason   Termination   Without Cause   Death   Disability   
Compensation
                                     
                                      
Severance  $0   $0   $729,583 (a)  $0   $705,174 (b)  $0   $0   
                                      
Long-term Incentives                                     
                                      
Cash LTI Awards (c)                                     
                                      
- UPP - 10   5,500    5,500    5,500    50,000    50,000    50,000    50,000   
                                      
- UPP - 11   0    0    0    100,000    100,000    66,667    66,667   
                                      
Acceleration of Unvested Equity (d)                                     
                                      
- Restricted Stock   0    0    0    41,780    41,780    0    0   
                                      
- Phantom Shares   0    0    0    268,697    268,697    0    0   
                                      
Benefits & Perquisites
                                     
                                      
Term Life Insurance   0    0    0    0    0    750,000    0   
                                      
Outplacement   0    0    20,000    0    0    0    0   
                                      
Health Benefits   0    0    18,000 (e)   0    0    0    0   
                                      
Total
  $5,500   $5,500   $773,083   $460,477   $1,165,651   $866,667   $116,667   
                                      
(a)Severance based on a multiple of one times current annual base salary plus average bonus paid (including bonuses paid in equity) for fiscal years ending November 30, 2006, November 30, 2005 and November 30, 2004, as provided by the Executive Severance Plan.
(b)Severance based on a multiple of one times average annual base salary plus average bonus paid (including bonuses paid in equity) for fiscal years ending November 30, 2006, November 30, 2005 and November 30, 2004, as provided by the CIC Plan.
(c)Assumes awards paid at target performance levels for a change in control. For death and disability, amounts reflect a pro-rated target payment based on the number of months the award is outstanding.
(d)Equity awards valued using closing price of $20.89 as of November 30, 2007. Phantom share values include accrued dividends on awards.
(e)Assumes monthly contributions by us for medical, dental and vision benefits in the amount of $1,500 per month for twelve months.


53


Audit and Compliance Committee Report
 
The Audit and Compliance Committee of the Board of Directors acts under a written Audit and Compliance Committee Charter. The Charter was first adopted in 1999, and was amended and restated in October 2005.charter.
 The
Under its charter, the Audit and Compliance Committee assists the Board of Directors in fulfilling the Board’s responsibility for oversight of the Company’s financial reporting process and practices, and its internal control over financial reporting. Management is primarily responsible for the Company’s financial statements, the reporting process and assurance for the adequacy of the internal control over financial reporting. The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, Ernst & Young LLP, is responsible for performing an independent audit of the Company’s financial statements and the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, and for expressing an opinion on the conformity of the Company’s audited financial statements to generally accepted accounting principles used in the United States and the adequacy of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
In this context, the Audit and Compliance Committee has reviewed and discussed with management and Ernst & Young LLP the Company’s audited financial statements. The Audit and Compliance Committee has discussed with Ernst & Young LLP the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61 (Communication with Audit Committees), as amended. In addition, the Audit and Compliance Committee has received from Ernst & Young LLP the written disclosures required by Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1 (Independence Discussions with Audit Committees) and discussed with Ernst & Young LLP its independence from the Company and the Company’s management.
 
The Audit and Compliance Committee has also reviewed management’s fiscal year 20062007 documentation, testing and evaluation of the adequacy of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and related rules and regulations, and has been apprised by both management and Ernst & Young LLP on management’s processes and activities in this regard. Following the conclusion of fiscal year 2006,2007, management reviewed with the Audit and Compliance Committee its report on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. The Audit and Compliance Committee also received a report from Ernst & Young LLP on management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
In reliance on the reviews, reports and discussions referred to above, the Audit and Compliance Committee recommended to the Board, and the Board approved, that the audited financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2006,2007, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
 
This report is respectfully submitted by the members of the Audit and Compliance Committee:
Mr. Michael G. McCaffery,Chairman
Mr. Ronald W. Burkle
Mr. Timothy W. Finchem
Ms. Melissa Lora
Mr. Luis G. Nogales


54

51


Independent Auditor Fees and Services
 
Auditor Fees and Services in Our 2007 and 2006 and 2005Fiscal Years
 The firm of
Ernst & Young LLP served as our principal independent registered public accounting firm for our 20062007 and 20052006 fiscal years. We paidServices provided by Ernst & Young LLP the followingand related fees in each of our 2006 and 2005last two fiscal years.years were as follows:
          
  Fiscal Year Ended
  (in thousands)
   
  2006 2005
 
Audit Fees  $1,523   $1,644 
Audit-related Fees  674   34 
Tax Fees  50   43 
All Other Fees      
   
 Total Fees $2,247  $1,721 
   
 
             
   Fiscal Year Ended
   (in thousands)
   2007   2006   
Audit Fees  $1,317   $1,523   
             
Audit-Related Fees   31    674   
             
Tax Fees   25    50   
             
All Other Fees   0    0   
             
Total Fees  $1,373   $2,247   
             
Audit fees include statutory audits of our French subsidiary, Kaufman & Broad S.A., which is publicly traded on Euronext Paris, audits of our mortgage bankingfinancial services subsidiary and audit services performed in connection with our compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Audit fees in our 2006 fiscal year included statutory audits for the Kaufman & Broad S.A. statutory audits totaled $620,000, our publicly-traded French subsidiary. We sold our entire interest in Kaufman & Broad S.A. in our 2007 fiscal 2006 and $689,000 in fiscal 2005.year.
 Audit-related services include
In our 2007 and 2006 fiscal years, audit-related fees forincluded 401(k) or employee benefit planSavings Plan audits and accounting consultations. In fiscalour 2006 audit-related fees included fees related to the internal review of our past stock option grant practices by a Subcommittee of the Audit and Compliance Committee of the Board of Directors in conjunction with independent legal counsel, as noted on page 9 above and further described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year, ended November 30, 2006. Fiscal 2006 audit-related fees also included feesservices related to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended 2006 to adjust certain non-cash compensation expense charges.Review.
 
Tax fees in our 2007 and 2006 fiscal years include fees for review of our federal income tax return, as well as several state income tax returns.
Auditor Fees Pre-approvalServices Pre-Approval Policy
 
In 2003, the Audit and Compliance Committee approved a policy concerning the pre-approval of audit and permitted non-audit services to be provided by the principal independent registered public accounting firm. The policy requires that the Audit and Compliance Committee pre-approve all services Ernst & Young LLP provides to us, including audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other services. In some cases, pre-approval is provided by the full Audit and Compliance Committee for up to a year, and relates to a particular category or group of services and is subject to a specific budget. In other cases, the Chair of the Audit and Compliance Committee Chair has the delegated authority from the Audit and Compliance Committee to pre-approve additional services, and such pre-approvals are then communicated to the full Audit Committee.
 
The Audit and Compliance Committee approved all audit and permitted non-audit services provided by Ernst & Young LLP during our 20062007 fiscal year.


55

52


Other Matters
 
Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions
 Matthew Karatz,
Per its charter, the Nominating/Governance Committee must review and approve or ratify, as applicable, any transaction, arrangement or relationship (or series of similar transactions, arrangements or relationships) in which we participate and in which a director, a director nominee, an executive officer or a beneficial owner of land acquisition and planning for our Greater Los Angeles division, is the son of Bruce Karatz, our former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. In our 2006 fiscal year, Matthew Karatz earned $184,535, comprised of salary, bonus and an automobile and gas allowance. Robert Karatz, who manages real estate broker relations for our Inland Valley division, is the brother of Bruce Karatz. In our 2006 fiscal year, Robert Karatz earned $110,982, comprised of professional services fees, incentive pay and an automobile and gas allowance. Both Matthew Karatz and Robert Karatz have been employed by us since 2002. Lance Freed, the son of Robert Freed, Senior Vice President, served as a Land Acquisition Analyst for the first halffive percent or more of our 2006common stock (or, in each case, an Immediate Family Member thereof) had or will have a direct or indirect material interest (a “Covered Transaction”), except as provided below or as otherwise determined by the Board. An “Immediate Family Member” is any child, stepchild, parent, stepparent, spouse, sibling,mother-in-law,father-in-law,son-in-law,daughter-in-law,brother-in-law orsister-in-law of a director, director nominee, executive officer or beneficial owner, and any person (other than a tenant or employee) sharing the household of such director, director nominee, executive officer or beneficial owner.
All Covered Transactions are subject to approval or ratification by the Nominating/Governance Committee in accordance with the following procedures:
• the Nominating/Governance Committee will approve or ratify a Covered Transaction if, based on a review of all material facts of the transaction and feasible alternatives, the Nominating/Governance Committee deems the transaction to be in our and our stockholders’ best interests.
• no director who has a direct or indirect material interest in a Covered Transaction will be included in any consideration of, or in any approval or ratification of, the transaction, provided that each such director will supply to the Nominating/Governance Committee or to the Board, as appropriate, all material information about the transaction.
• the Nominating/Governance Committee will consider Covered Transactions for approval or ratification at each regularly scheduled Nominating/Governance Committee meeting, or as circumstances otherwise require, and will annually review any ongoing Covered Transaction approved or ratified hereunder to assess if the transaction remains appropriate under the terms hereof. The Nominating/Governance Committee may establish guidelines for our management to follow with respect to any ongoing Covered Transactions.
• the Nominating/Governance Committee will oversee, as appropriate, our disclosure of Covered Transactions as required by federal securities laws.
• the Nominating/Governance Committee has reviewed the following Covered Transactions and determined that each of these transactions will be deemed to be pre-approved or ratified (as applicable) by the Nominating/Governance Committee:
  • any transaction in which the total amount involved is equal to or less than $120,000;
  • the employment and compensation (a) of a director or executive officer if the individual’s compensation is reported in our annual proxy statement, or (b) of any other executive officer who is not an Immediate Family Member of one of the foregoing individuals or a director nominee if such executive officer’s compensation was approved, or recommended for approval, by the Compensation Committee;
  • any transaction that would not (a) need to be reported under federal securities laws, (b) be deemed to impair a director’s independence under our Corporate Governance Principles and (c) be deemed to be a conflict of interest under our Ethics Policy; and
  • any transaction where an individual’s interest therein arises solely from ownership of our common stock and all holders of our common stock received the same benefit on a pro rata basis.
The Nominating/Governance Committee has determined that there were no Covered Transactions during our 2007 fiscal year and as a Land Associate for the second half of our 2006 fiscal year for our Central Valley Division. In our 2006 fiscal year, Lance Freed earned $61,597, comprised of salary, bonus and an automobile allowance. Lance Freed resigned in January 2007.year.


56


Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
 
Based uponsolely on written representations furnished to us from reporting persons and our review of Forms 3, 4 and 5 and any amendments thereto furnished to us, in compliance withwe believe all such Forms required to be filed during our 2007 fiscal year under Section 1616(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, of 1934, as amended, all such Forms were filed on a timely basis by our reporting persons during fiscal year 2006.persons.
Financial StatementsOther Business
 Our audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto, including selected financial information and management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2006, are included on pages 25 through 88 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for that period. The Form 10-K was mailed to stockholders on March 5, 2007. The financial statements, the report of the independent auditors thereon, selected financial information, and management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations in the Form 10-K are incorporated by reference herein.Additional copies of the Form 10-K are available without charge upon request to the Corporate Secretary at KB Home, 10990 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90024. Exhibits to the Form 10-K will be provided upon request and payment of copying charges. You may also view and download copies of the 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K from our website at: http://www.kbhome.com/ investor.
Other Business
The Board of Directors knows of no business other than that described in this Proxy Statement that will be presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting. If other business shall properly come before the Annual Meeting, shares of our common stock represented by valid proxies will be voted on such matters in accordance with the best judgment of the persons named as proxies on the Proxy Cardsproxy cards for the Annual Meeting, or their duly authorized designees.

53


Stockholder Proposals for 2008Our 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
 
For inclusion in the Proxy Statement and form of proxy for our 20082009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, we must receive no later than November 5, 20072008 any proposal of a stockholder intended to be presented at that meeting. Further, managementthe Board-designated proxies for our 20082009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders will use their discretionary voting authority with respect to any proposal presented at the meeting by a stockholder who does not provide us with written notice of the proposal on or prior to January 19, 2008.2009.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
/s/William A. Richelieu
William A. Richelieu
(-s- Wendy C. Shiba)
Wendy C. Shiba
Assistant Executive Vice President, General Counsel and
Corporate Secretary
Los Angeles, California
March 5, 2007


57

54


KB HOME
10990 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90024
kbhome.com     888-KB-HOMES
(FSC LOGO)
As part of KB Home’s commitment to sustainability and the responsible use of natural resources, this report has been printed on paper certified by the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC). This certification supports the development of responsible forest management worldwide by adhering to strict standards for paper sources. The wood in this paper comes from FSC-certified well-managed forests, company-controlled sources and/or recycled material.


PROXY
(KB HOME LOGO)
PROXY FOR ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
APRIL 3, 2008
CONFIDENTIAL INSTRUCTIONS TO FIDELITY MANAGEMENT TRUST COMPANY
TRUSTEE FOR THE KB HOME 401(k) SAVINGS PLAN
PROXY SOLICITED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Receipt of proxy material for the above Annual Meeting is acknowledged. I instruct you to vote (in person or by proxy) all shares of Common Stock of KB Home (the “Company”) held by you for my account under the Company’s Amended and Restated 401(k) Savings Plan at the Company’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on April 3, 2008, and at all adjournments or postponements thereof, on the matters as indicated on the reverse side of this card. If this card is signed and returned, but no choice is specified, I instruct you to vote this proxy FOR Proposals 1 and 2 and AGAINST Proposals 3 and 4, if properly presented at the Annual Meeting, and on such other business as may come before the Annual Meeting in accordance with the judgment of Jeffrey T. Mezger and Wendy C. Shiba, and each of them, as proxies with full power of substitution and revocation.
PLEASE MARK, DATE AND SIGN THESE INSTRUCTIONS AND RETURN THEM PROMPTLY, OR SUBMIT THESE INSTRUCTIONS BY TELEPHONE OR THE INTERNET AS INDICATED ON THE REVERSE SIDE OF THIS CARD, EVEN IF YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING.
(Continued, and to be marked, dated and signed, on the other side)

Address Change/Comments (Mark the corresponding box on the reverse side)




5Detach here from proxy voting card5
ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS APRIL 3, 2008
Dear Fellow Employee:
As a reminder, your vote and your investment in KB Home are very important. If you intend to vote by mail, please complete and return your Confidential Instruction Card for tabulation by no later than March 29, 2008 to ensure that your vote is counted.
Jeffrey T. Mezger
President and Chief Executive Officer
[Note: This proxy card is printed with a green color band]


Mark here for address change or comments.o
PLEASE SEE REVERSE SIDE

YOUR DIRECTORS RECOMMEND A VOTE“FOR”
1.ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
FORAGAINSTABSTAIN
01STEPHEN F. BOLLENBACHooo
02TIMOTHY W. FINCHEMooo
03J. TERRENCE LANNIooo
FORAGAINSTABSTAIN
2.PROPOSAL TO RATIFY THE APPOINTMENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP AS KB HOME’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING NOVEMBER 30, 2008.ooo
YOUR DIRECTORS RECOMMEND A VOTE“AGAINST”
FORAGAINSTABSTAIN
3.STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL RELATING TO EXECUTIVE COMPENSATIONooo
FORAGAINSTABSTAIN
4.STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL RELATING TO STOCKHOLDER APPROVAL OF SEVERANCE AGREEMENTS.ooo
This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein by the undersigned. If no direction is made, this proxy will be voted FOR proposals 1 and 2, and AGAINST proposals 3 and 4, if properly presented at the annual meeting.


Signature(s)Date, 2008
Note: Please sign EXACTLY as your name appears hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please give full title. If more than one trustee, all should sign. Joint owners should sign.
5Detach here from proxy voting card5
Vote by Telephone, by Internet or by Mail
Telephone and Internet voting are available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week through 11:59 p.m.
Eastern Daylight Time on the day prior to annual meeting day.
Your telephone or Internet vote authorizes the named proxies to vote your shares in the same manner
as if you marked, signed and returned your proxy card.


Telephone
1-866-540-5760


Use any touch-tone telephone to
vote your proxy. Have your proxy card
in hand when you call.

OR


Internet
http://www.proxyvoting.com/kbh-sp

Use the Internet to vote your proxy. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the website.

OR

Mail

Mark, sign and date
your proxy card and
return it in the
enclosed postage-paid envelope.

If you vote your proxy by telephone or by Internet, you
do NOT need to mail back your proxy card.
You may access and download copies of our Annual Report, our 2007 Report on Form 10-K and our 2008
Proxy Statement from our website at http://www.kbhome.com/investor/proxy.


PROXY
(KB HOME LOGO)
PROXY FOR ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
APRIL 3, 2008
PROXY SOLICITED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The undersigned hereby appoints Jeffrey T. Mezger and Wendy C. Shiba, and each of them, as proxies with full power of substitution and revocation, to vote all of the shares of KB Home Common Stock the undersigned is entitled to vote at the KB Home Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on April 3, 2008, or at any adjournment or postponement thereof, on the Proposals as indicated on the reverse side of this Proxy Card, and upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof in accordance with their judgement.
Please mark, date and sign this Proxy Card and return it promptly, or vote by telephone or the Internet as indicated on the reverse side of this Proxy Card, even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting.
(Continued, and to be marked, dated and signed, on the other side)

Address Change/Comments (Mark the corresponding box on the reverse side)




5Detach here from proxy voting card5
[Note: This proxy card does not have any color band]


Mark here for address change or comments.o
PLEASE SEE REVERSE SIDE

YOUR DIRECTORS RECOMMEND A VOTE“FOR”
1.ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
FORAGAINSTABSTAIN
01STEPHEN F. BOLLENBACHooo
02TIMOTHY W. FINCHEMooo
03J. TERRENCE LANNIooo
FORAGAINSTABSTAIN
2.PROPOSAL TO RATIFY THE APPOINTMENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP AS KB HOME’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING NOVEMBER 30, 2008.ooo
YOUR DIRECTORS RECOMMEND A VOTE“AGAINST”
FORAGAINSTABSTAIN
3.STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL RELATING TO EXECUTIVE COMPENSATIONooo
FORAGAINSTABSTAIN
4.STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL RELATING TO STOCKHOLDER APPROVAL OF SEVERANCE AGREEMENTS.ooo
This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein by the undersigned. If no direction is made, this proxy will be voted FOR proposals 1 and 2, and AGAINST proposals 3 and 4, if properly presented at the annual meeting.


Signature(s)Date, 2008
Note: Please sign EXACTLY as your name appears hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please give full title. If more than one trustee, all should sign. Joint owners should sign.
5Detach here from proxy voting card5
Vote by Telephone, by Internet or by Mail
Telephone and Internet voting are available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week through 11:59 p.m.
Eastern Daylight Time on the day prior to annual meeting day.
Your telephone or Internet vote authorizes the named proxies to vote your shares in the same manner
as if you marked, signed and returned your proxy card.


Telephone
1-866-540-5760


Use any touch-tone telephone to
vote your proxy. Have your proxy card
in hand when you call.

OR


Internet
http://www.proxyvoting.com/kbh

Use the Internet to vote your proxy. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the website.

OR

Mail

Mark, sign and date
your proxy card and
return it in the
enclosed postage-paid envelope.

If you vote your proxy by telephone or by Internet, you
do NOT need to mail back your proxy card.
You may access and download copies of our Annual Report, our 2007 Report on Form 10-K and our 2008
Proxy Statement from our website at http://www.kbhome.com/investor/proxy.


PROXY
(KB HOME LOGO)
PROXY FOR ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
APRIL 3, 2008
CONFIDENTIAL INSTRUCTIONS TO WACHOVIA BANK, N.A.
TRUSTEE FOR THE KB HOME GRANTOR STOCK TRUST
PROXY SOLICITED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
With respect to the voting at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of KB Home (the “Company”) to be held on April 3, 2008, or any adjournment or postponement thereof, the undersigned participant in the Company’s employee stock option plans hereby directs Wachovia Bank, N.A., as Trustee of the Company’s Grantor Stock Trust, to vote all of the shares for which the undersigned is entitled to direct the vote under the Grantor Stock Trust in accordance with the following instructions:
THE VOTES THAT THE UNDERSIGNED IS ENTITLED TO DIRECT UNDER THE COMPANY’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
PLEASE MARK, DATE AND SIGN THESE INSTRUCTIONS AND RETURN THEM PROMPTLY, OR SUBMIT THESE INSTRUCTIONS BY TELEPHONE OR THE INTERNET AS INDICATED ON THE REVERSE SIDE OF THIS CARD, EVEN IF YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING.
(Continued, and to be marked, dated and signed, on the other side)

Address Change/Comments (Mark the corresponding box on the reverse side)




5Detach here from proxy voting card5
ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS APRIL 3, 2008
Dear Fellow Employee:
As a reminder, your vote and your investment in KB Home are very important. If you intend to vote by mail, please complete and return your Confidential Instruction Card for tabulation by no later than March 29, 2008 to ensure that your vote is counted.
Jeffrey T. Mezger
President and Chief Executive Officer
[Note: This proxy card is printed with a red color band]


Mark here for address change or comments.o
PLEASE SEE REVERSE SIDE

YOUR DIRECTORS RECOMMEND A VOTE“FOR”
1.ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
FORAGAINSTABSTAIN
01STEPHEN F. BOLLENBACHooo
02TIMOTHY W. FINCHEMooo
03J. TERRENCE LANNIooo
FORAGAINSTABSTAIN
2.PROPOSAL TO RATIFY THE APPOINTMENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP AS KB HOME’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING NOVEMBER 30, 2008.ooo
YOUR DIRECTORS RECOMMEND A VOTE“AGAINST”
FORAGAINSTABSTAIN
3.STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL RELATING TO EXECUTIVE COMPENSATIONooo
FORAGAINSTABSTAIN
4.STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL RELATING TO STOCKHOLDER APPROVAL OF SEVERANCE AGREEMENTS.ooo
This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein by the undersigned. If no direction is made, this proxy will be voted FOR proposals 1 and 2, and AGAINST proposals 3 and 4, if properly presented at the annual meeting.


Signature(s)Date, 2008
Note: Please sign EXACTLY as your name appears hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please give full title. If more than one trustee, all should sign. Joint owners should sign.
5Detach here from proxy voting card5
Vote by Telephone, by Internet or by Mail
Telephone and Internet voting are available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week through 11:59 p.m.
Eastern Daylight Time on the day prior to annual meeting day.
Your telephone or Internet vote authorizes the named proxies to vote your shares in the same manner
as if you marked, signed and returned your proxy card.


Telephone
1-866-540-5760


Use any touch-tone telephone to
vote your proxy. Have your proxy card
in hand when you call.

OR


Internet
http://www.proxyvoting.com/kbh-gst

Use the Internet to vote your proxy. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the website.

OR

Mail

Mark, sign and date
your proxy card and
return it in the
enclosed postage-paid envelope.

If you vote your proxy by telephone or by Internet, you
do NOT need to mail back your proxy card.
You may access and download copies of our Annual Report, our 2007 Report on Form 10-K and our 2008
Proxy Statement from our website at http://www.kbhome.com/investor/proxy.